Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version Scale of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Evaluation Scale (CLES+T)

한국어판 임상학습환경과 슈퍼비전, 임상실습지도교수(CLES+T) 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도

  • 김선희 (대구가톨릭대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 유소연 (경일대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 김예영 (경일대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2017.02.26
  • Accepted : 2018.02.08
  • Published : 2018.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T) that measures the clinical learning environment and the conditions associated with supervision and nurse teachers. Methods: The English CLES+T was translated into Korean with forward and back translation. Survey data were collected from 434 nursing students who had more than four days of clinical practice in Korean hospitals. Internal consistency reliability and construct validity using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis were conducted. SPSS 20.0 and AMOS 22.0 programs were used for data analysis. Results: The exploratory factor analysis revealed seven factors for the thirty three-item scale. Confirmatory factor analysis supported good convergent and discriminant validities. The Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was .94 and for the seven subscales ranged from .78 to .94. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the 33-items Korean CLES+T is an appropriate instrument to measure Korean nursing students'clinical learning environment with good validity and reliability.

Keywords

References

  1. Chan D. Development of the clinical learning environment inventory: Using the theoretical framework of learning environment studies to assess nursing students'perceptions of the hospital as a learning environment. Journal of Nursing Education. 2002;41(2):69-75.
  2. Mansutti I, Saiani L, Grassetti L, Palese A. Instruments evaluating the quality of the clinical learning environment in nursing education: A systematic review of psychometric properties. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2017;68:60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.001
  3. Papp I, Markkanen M, von Bonsdorff M. Clinical environment as a learning environment: Student nurses' perceptions concerning clinical learning experiences. Nurse Education Today. 2003;23(4):262-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(02)00185-5
  4. Kown IS, Seo YM. Nursing students'needs for clinical nursing education. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2012;18(1):25-33. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.1.025
  5. Kim EY, Yang SH. Effects of clinical learning environment on clinical practice stress and anxiety in nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2015;21(4):417-425. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2015.21.4.417
  6. Kim K. Affecting factors on competence of clinical practice of nursing students. The Korean Journal of Stress Research. 2014;22(2):55-65. https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2014.22.2.55
  7. Saarikoski M, Isoaho H, Warne T, Leino-Kilpi H. The nurse teacher in clinical practice: Developing the new subdimension to the clinical learning environment and supervision (CLES) scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2008;45(8):1233-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.07.009
  8. Saarikoski M, Leino-Kilpi H. The clinical learning environment and supervision by staff nurses: Developing the instrument. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2002;39(3):259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(01)00031-1
  9. Song J, Kim M. Study on clinical education for nursing in hospitals in Korea. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(2):251-264. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.2.251
  10. Chan DS, Ip WY. Perception of hospital learning environment: A survey of Hong Kong nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2007;27(7):677-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.09.015
  11. Dunn SV, Burnett P. The development of a clinical learning environment scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1995;22(6):1166-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb03119.x
  12. Chung MS, Park JS, Ryu E, Shin G, Jun HY, Kim BJ. Teaching effectiveness and adequacy of practical training in nursing students. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2015;21(4):550-560. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.4.550
  13. Han J. Nursing students'perceptions of clinical learning environment (CLE). Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 2010;12(5):2595-2607.
  14. Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992. p. 217.
  15. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods. 1996;1(2):130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  16. Giraudeau B, Mary JY. Planning a reproducibility study: How many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Statistics in Medicine. 2001;20(21):3205-3214. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.935
  17. Whang SJ. Development and verification of a tool for the nursing students'clinical stress. Journal of the Margaret Pritchard College of Nursing. 2002;14(1):35-54.
  18. World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [Internet]. Geneva: Author; c2015 [cited 2016 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
  19. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 30-34, 83-84, 149-156.
  20. Lee K, Shin S. Validity of instrument development research in Korean nursing research. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(6):697-703. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.697
  21. Geldhof GJ, Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ. Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods. 2014;19(1):72-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
  22. Tomietto M, Saiani L, Palese A, Cunico L, Cicolini G, Watson P, et al. Clinical learning environment and supervision plus nurse teacher (CLES+T) scale: Testing the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia. 2012;34(2 Suppl B):B72-B80.
  23. Watson PB, Seaton P, Sims D, Jamieson I, Mountier J, Whittle R, et al. Exploratory factor analysis of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES+T). Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2014;22(1):164-180. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.22.1.164
  24. Iacobucci D, Duhachek A. Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with confidence. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2003;13(4):478-487. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_14
  25. Johansson UB, Kaila P, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Leksell J, Isoaho H, Saarikoski M. Clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher evaluation scale: Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010;66(9):2085-2093. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05370.x
  26. Vizcaya-Moreno MF, Perez-Canaveras RM, De Juan J, Saarikoski M. Development and psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T): The Spanish version. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015;52(1):361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.008
  27. Papastavrou E, Dimitriadou M, Tsangari H. Psychometric testing of the Greek version of the Clinical Learning Environment-Teacher (CLES+T). Global Journal of Health Science. 2016;8(5):59-71. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p59
  28. Polit DF. Getting serious about test-retest reliability: A critique of retest research and some recommendations. Quality of Life Research. 2014;23(6):1713-1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0632-9
  29. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  30. Gustafsson M, Blomberg K, Holmefur M. Test-retest reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) scale. Nurse Education in Practice. 2015;15(4):253-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.02.003

Cited by

  1. 간호대학생이 지각한 임상실습현장지도자의 돌봄에 대한 한국어판 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 분석 vol.19, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2018.19.12.218
  2. 간호학과 신입생의 성격유형, 학습스타일과 학업성취도의 관계 vol.5, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17703/jcct.2019.5.2.247
  3. 간호대학생의 지역사회 방문건강관리 실습경험 vol.31, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2020.31.1.43
  4. The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and the Nurse Teacher Evaluation Scale: Turkish Version vol.26, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12795
  5. Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of Nursing Student Perceptions of Dishonesty Scale vol.27, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2020.27.2.176
  6. Validation of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale: A Methodological Study vol.18, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031080