DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

가구통행실태조사 자료를 활용한 서울시 연계수단 통행행태의 영향요인 분석 연구

Analyzing Factors to Affect Trip Mode Chaining Behavior Using Travel Diary Survey Data in Seoul

  • 김수재 (홍익대학교 도시계획과) ;
  • 추상호 (홍익대학교 건설도시공학부) ;
  • 김지윤 (홍익대학교 도시계획과) ;
  • 한재윤 (홍익대학교 도시계획과)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.08
  • 심사 : 2018.02.21
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28

초록

최근 공유교통 서비스가 확대되면서 개인교통수단과 대중교통수단을 연계한 통합모빌리티 서비스가 주목을 받고 있으며, 이를 위해서는 연계수단 통행행태 분석이 필수적이다. 본 연구에서는 2010년 서울시 가구통행실태조사 자료를 이용하여 연계수단 통행의 특성을 분석하고, 다항로짓모형을 통해 연계수단 선택에 미치는 영향요인을 분석하였다. 먼저 통행수단을 승용차, 시내버스, 시외버스, 철도, 택시, 기타 등으로 구분하여 25가지의 연계수단 통행유형을 분석하였으며, 이중 시내버스와 철도의 연계통행이 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이들 연계수단 통행은 주로 출근통행목적에서 많이 발생하며, 오전/오후 첨두를 형성하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 다항로짓모형 추정결과, 개인특성의 성별, 연령, 가구특성의 차량보유여부, 가구소득, 통행특성의 통행목적, 통행시간, 통행거리, 지역적특성의 지하철 및 버스 노선수, 상업용도 면적비율, 토지이용 혼합도, 도착지역의 도심권여부 등이 연계수단 선택에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Recently, as shared transportation services has expanded, integrated mobility services that link personal transportation and public transportation are paid attention. To do this, it is necessary to analyze trip mode chaining behavior. This study analyzed the characteristics of the trip mode chaining behavior using the 2010 travel diary survey in Seoul, and analyzed factors to affect mode choice of trip chaining through the multinomial logit model. The transportation means were classified into passenger cars, city buses, intercity buses, railways, taxis, and others, and 25 trip mode chaining types were identified. Among them, the trip share connected between city bus and railways was the highest. It was also found that the trip mode chaining occurred mainly at commuting and in the morning and afternoon peak. According to the model results, the mode choice of trip chaining is significantly influenced by individual attributes (sex and age), household attributes (car ownership and income), trip attributes (trip purpose, trip time and trip length), and arrival area attributes (number of subway lines and bus lines, ratio of commercial area, land use mix and central region).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ambrosino G., Nelson J. D., Boero M. and Pettinelli I.(2016), "Enabling Intermodal Urban Transport Through Complementary Service: Form Flexible Mobility Services to the Shared Use Mobility Agency," Workshop4. Developing inter-modal transport system, vol. 59, pp.179-184.
  2. Bin M. Y.(2011), "Factors Influencing Commuting Time to Work for The Simple Linkage Travel," Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, vol. 29, no. 4, pp.29-41.
  3. Hensher D. A.(2017), "Future Bus Transport Contacts Under a Mobility as a Service Regime in the Digital Age: Are They Likely to Change?," Transportation Research Part A, vol. 98, pp.243-248.
  4. Hietanen S.(2014), "Mobility as a Service - The New Transport Model," Eurotransport, vol. 12, no. 2, pp.2-4.
  5. Jang O. J. and Park J. S.(2015), "Potential Analysis of Sharing Economy Transportation Services and Realization Strategies," The Korea Transport Institute, pp.15-17.
  6. Jun E. H. and Lee S. W.(2007), "A Study of Mode Choice for Commuters in Seoul Metropolitan Area," The Seoul Institute, vol. 8, no. 4, pp.107-125
  7. Jun M. J.(1997), "The Relationships between Land Use Patterns and Mode Choices for Home-Based Work Trips: The case of Seoul metropolitan Region," Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, vol. 15, no. 3, pp.39-49.
  8. Kim K. B. and Hwang K. S.(2010), "A Study on the Choice Behavior of Transportation Mode in Jeju," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, vol. 11, no. 12 pp.4795-4802. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.12.4795
  9. Kim T. H. and Park K. H.(2010), "Analysis on Transportation Connections in Seoul Subway," Korean Society for Railway, vol. 13, no. 2, pp.25-29.
  10. Lee H. S. and Lee H. Y.(2009), "Differential Changes in Commuter's Mode Choice after the Intergrated Public Transit System in Seoul Metropolitan City," Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, vol. 44, no. 3, pp.323-338.
  11. Lee S. H., Kim J. S., Kim M. S. and Woo Y. H.(2013), "A Study on User's Travel Behavior Analysis of Transit Transfer," The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp.147-157. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2013.12.1.147
  12. Martin J.(2016), "Mobility as a Service(MaaS) - a new way of using ITS in public transport," Eurotransport, vol. 14, no. 4, pp.2-5.
  13. Nelson J. D., Wright S., Masson B., Ambrosino G. and Naniopoulos A.(2010), "Recent Development in Flexible Transport Services," Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 29, pp.243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.030
  14. Pan H., Shen Q. and Xue S.(2010), "Intermodal Transfer Between Bicycles and Rail Transit in Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Record, No. 2144, pp.181-188.
  15. Park K. C. and Song J. H.(2008), "Analysis on Transfer Trip of GyeongGi-Do," GyeongGi Research Institute, p.93.
  16. Park U. H., Lee W. D. and Cho C. H.(2013), "Activity-Based Analysis of Metropolitan Household Survey," The Korean Geographical Society, pp.77-82.
  17. Song D. Y., Kim H. J. and Choo S. H.(2003), "An Analysis of the Effect of Trip-Chaining Behavior on Mode Choice," Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, vol. 20, no. 4, pp.163-175
  18. Sung H. G., Shim J. I. and Lim H. J.(2009), "A Study on the Socio-Economic and Travel Characteristics of Park/Kiss-and-Ride Commuters in the Seoul Metropolitan Area," Journal of Transport Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp.53-66.
  19. Sung H. G., Shin K. S. and No J. H.(2008), "Impacts of the Accessibility of Parking and Public Transportation on Mode Choice by Trip Purpose in the city of Seoul," Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, vol. 26, no. 3, pp.97-18.