대한본초학회지 (The Korea Journal of Herbology)

  • 제33권1호
  • /
  • Pages.85-91
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1229-1765(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-7199(eISSN)
대한본초학회 (The Korea Association of Herbology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

당귀(當歸)의 건조방법 및 뿌리 부위에 따른 품질 평가

Quality evaluation of Angelica gigas Nakai with different drying methods and different root parts

  • Seong, Gi Un (National Development Institute of Korean Medicine) ;
  • Beak, Mi Eun (National Development Institute of Korean Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Young Jong (Department of Herbology, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University) ;
  • Won, Jae Hee (National Development Institute of Korean Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.08
  • 심사 : 2018.01.15
  • 발행 : 2018.01.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives : This study was carried out to evaluate the quality of different drying methods and different roots(primary root and lateral root) of Angelica gigas Nakai. Methods : The experimental method was performed according to the Korea Pharmacopoea Eleventh edition (KP11). Loss on drying, ash, acid insoluble ash, ethanol extract, nodakenin and total decursin contents were tested to evaluate the quality of root tissue of Angelica gigas Nakai. In addition, the treatment of different root parts were prepared in two groups of washing dry process and natural dry process. Results : In comparison of dry processing methods, total contents of nodakenin and total decursin in the primary root and lateral root through washing dry process were ranged from 3.55 to 4.09% and from 5.18 to 6.13%, respectively. And also, those of roots from the natural dry process were from 4.36 to 6.22% and from 6.28 to 8.34%, respectively. In the washing dry process and natural dry process methods, 47.9% and 22.3% higher amount of nodakenin and total decursin were measured in lateral root compared to primary root. In common, lateral roots accumulated higher contents of nodakenin and total decursin compared to primary roots, and samples drying processed with natural dry process compared to washing dry process method contained higher amount of compounds. Conclusions : We sincerely hope that this study will be contributed to the standardization and quality control of Angelica Gigas Root.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Heo JS, Cha JY, Kim HW, Ahn HY, Eom KE, Heo SJ, Cho YS. Bioactive materials and biological activity in extracts of leaf, stem nixture and root from Angelica gigas Nakai. J. Life Sci. 2010 ; 20 : 750-759. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2010.20.5.750
  2. Park KW, Choi SR, Shon MY, Jeong IY, Kang KS, Lee ST, Shim KH and Seo KI. Cytotoxic effects of decursin from Angelica gigas Nakai in human cancer cells. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Ntr. 2007 ; 36(11) : 1385. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2007.36.11.1385
  3. Lee S, Lee YS, Jung SH, Shin KH, Kim BK and Kang SS. Anti-tumor activities of Decursinol angelate and decursin from Angelica gigas . Arch. Pharm. Res. 2003 ; 26(9) : 727. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02976682
  4. Rehman SU, Chohan ZH, Gulnaz F and Supuran CT. In-vitro antibacterial, antifungal and cytotoxic activities of some coumarins and their metal complexes. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2005 ; 20(4) : 333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14756360500141911
  5. Park KW, Choi SR, Hong HR, Kim JY, Shon MY and Seo KI. Biological activities of methanol extract of Angelica gigas Nakai. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2007 ; 328(5) : 308.
  6. Jung MH, Lee SH, Ahn EM and Lee YM. Decursin and decursinol angelate inhibit VEGF-induced angiogenesis via suppression of the VEGFR-2-signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2009 ; 30(4) : 655. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp039
  7. Adb El-Aty AM, Shah SS, Kim BM, Choi JH, Cho HJ, Yi H, Chang BJ, Shin HC, Lee KB, Shimoda M and Shim JH. In vitro inhibitory potential of decursin and decursinol angelate on the catalytic activity of cytochrome P-450 1A1/2, 2D15 and 3A12 isoforms in canine hepatic microsomes. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2008 ; 31(11): 1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-001-2127-9
  8. Yoo HH, Lee MW, Kim YC, Yun CH and Kim DH. Mechanism-based inactivation of cytochrome P450 2A6 by decursinol angelate isolated from angelica gigas . Drug. Metab. Dispos. 2007 ; 35(10) : 1759 https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.107.016584
  9. Jeong SY, Kim HM, Lee KH, Kim KY, Huang DS, Kim JH and Seong RS. Quantitative Analysis of Marker Compounds in Angelica gigas , Angelica sinensis, and Angelica acutiloba by HPLC/DAD. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2015 ; 63 : 504-511. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c15-00081
  10. Bang KH, Yu HS, Koo DH, Sho JH, Park HW, Seong NS, Park SI, Kim HS. Selection of RAPD marker to discriminate the bolting-resistant varieties and commercial dried medicinal materials of Angelica species. Korean J. Medicinal Crop Sci. 2002 ; 10(1) : 46-50.
  11. Lee MY, Im SH, Ju YS, Han KS, Jeong GJ, An DG, Kang HC, Ko BS. Discrimination of three Angelica species using the RAPDS and internal root structure. Korean J. Medicinal Crop Sci. 2000 ; 8(3) : 243-249.
  12. Kim JR, Lee DY, Sung SH, Kim JW. Geographical Classification of Angelica gigas using UHPLC-DAD Combined Multivariate Analyses. Kor. J. Pharmacogn. 2013 ; 44(4) : 332-335.
  13. Lee SH, Lee YS, Jung SH, Shin KH, Kim BK, Kang SS. Antioxidant Activities of Decursinol Angelate and Decursin from Angelica gigas Roots. Natural Product Sciences. 2003 ; 9(3) : 170-173.
  14. Kang YG, Lee JH, Chae HJ, Kim DH, Lee SH and Park SY. HPLC Analysis and Extraction Methods of Decursin and Decursinol Angelate in Angelica gigas Roots. Kor. J. Pharmacogn. 2003 ; 34(3) : 201-205.
  15. KFDA. Gideline for standard manufacturing process of herbal medicines(I). Seoul : Yeoiju. 2008 : 147