DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance of Shear Dominant Hybrid Steel Link Beam with Circular Web Opening

원형 개구부가 있는 전단지배 하이브리드 강재 연결보의 내진성능

  • Lim, Woo-Young (Department of Architectural Engineering, Wonkwang University)
  • 임우영 (원광대학교, 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2017.12.04
  • Accepted : 2018.01.23
  • Published : 2018.02.27

Abstract

Cyclic loading tests for shear dominant hybrid steel link beams with circular web openings were performed to evaluate the seismic performance. Four half-scaled specimens with bolted connections were tested. The test parameter is a diameter of the web opening, i.e., shear strength ratio ($V_{pw}/V_p$) of the link beam and presence of top-seat angles. Using test results, adequate design shear strength of link beam was finally suggested. Test results showed that when the shear capacity is less than half of the plastic shear strength, seismic performance was improved due to mitigation of pinching under reversed cyclic inelastic deformations.

이 연구에서는 원형 개구부가 있는 전단지배 하이브리드 강재 연결보의 내진성능을 평가하기 위해 탑-시트 앵글이 있는 실험체 3개(SCB1, SCB2, SCB3)와 앵글이 없는 실험체 1개 (SCB4) 등 총 4개의 강재 연결보 시스템에 대한 반복가력 실험이 수행되었다. 실험변수는 웨브 개구부의 크기, 즉 전단강도비이다. SCB1, SCB2, SCB3, 그리고 SCB4 실험체의 전단강도비(웨브 개구부 크기)는 0.34(300mm), 0.49(268mm), 0.78(200mm), 그리고 0.34(300mm)이다. 실험결과, 제안된 연결보 시스템은 우수한 변형능력과 강성을 보여주었다. 실험연구를 통해 하이브리드 강재 연결보 시스템에 적용가능한 설계전단강도를 제안하였다. 연결보의 전단강도가 소성전단강도의 50% 이하일 때 핀칭이 완화되는 것으로 나타났으며, 이로 인해 내진 성능이 향상되는 것으로 나타났다. 핀칭을 최소화하고, 내진성능을 향상시키기 위해서는 연결보 구조설계 시 연결보의 전단강도를 50% 이상 저감시키는 방안도 고려될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Paulay, T. and Binney, J.R. (1974) Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams of Shear Walls, ACI Journal Special Publication, Vol.42, Detroit, pp.579-589.
  2. 오상훈, 최광용, 유홍식(2012) 고층 전단벽시스템 적용을 위한 직렬 연결형 강재이력댐퍼의 구조성능 평가, 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회, 제24권, 제4호, pp.371-382. (Oh, S.H., Choi, G.Y., and Ryu, H.S. (2012) Structural Performance Evaluations of Steel Hysteretic Damper in Series for High-Rise Shear Wall System, Journal of Korea Society of Steel Construction, KSSC, Vol.24, No.4, pp. 371-382 (in Korean).)
  3. ACI Committee 318 (2014) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, p.519.
  4. Harries, K.A., Fortney, P.J., Shahrooz, B.M., and Brienen, P.J. (2005) Practical Design of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams-Critical Review of ACI 318 Requirements, ACI Structural Journal, Vol.102, No.6, pp.876-882.
  5. Gong, B. and Shahrooz, B.M. (2001) Steel-Concrete Composite Coupling Beams-Behavior and Design, Engineering Structures, Vol.23, No.11, pp.1480-1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00042-6
  6. Harries, K.A., Mitchell, D., Cook, W.D., and Redwood, R.G. (1993), "Seismic Response of Steel Beams Coupling Concrete Walls," Journal of Structural Engineering, ADCE, Vol.119, No.12, pp.3611-3629. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3611)
  7. Lim, W.Y., Kang, T.H.-K., and Hong, S.G. (2016) Cyclic Testing of Bolted Steel Coupling Beams in Fast-Track Precast Concrete Construction, ACI Structural Journal, Vol.113, No. 6, pp.1289-1300.
  8. AISC (2011) Steel Construction Manual, 14th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, p.2192.
  9. KS B 0801(2010) 금속 재료 인장 시험편, 한국표준협회, p.14. (KS B 0801 (2010) Test Pieces for Tensile Test for Metallic Materials, Korean Standards Association, p.14.)
  10. KS D 3504(2016) 철근 콘크리트용 봉강, 한국표준협회, p.33. (KS D 3504 (2016) Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, Korean Standards Association, p.33.)
  11. Lim, W.Y., Kang, T.H.-K., and Hong, S.G. (2016) Cyclic Lateral Testing of Precast Concrete T-walls in Fast Low-rise Construction, ACI Structural Journal, Vol.113, No.1, pp.179-189.
  12. Hawkins, N.M. and Ghosh, S.K. (2004) Acceptance Criteria for Special Precast Concrete Structural Walls Based on Validation Testing, PCI Journal, Vol.49, No. 5, pp.78-92.
  13. Fib (2003) Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Building Structures, Federation Internationale du Beton, p.262.

Cited by

  1. Experimental Study on Shear-Resistant Capacity of Indirect Connection for Seismic Retrofit Using Steel Moment Frames vol.32, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2020.32.6.363
  2. Experimental Study on Shear-Resistant Capacity of Bolted Indirect Connection for Steel Seismic Retrofit Method vol.33, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2021.33.1.031