대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제45권1호
  • /
  • Pages.82-89
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

광원의 종류에 따른 광역동 치료시의 Streptococcus mutans에 대한 항균 효과

Antimicrobial Effect on Streptococcus mutans in Photodynamic Therapy using Different Light Source

  • 김재용 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박호원 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 이주현 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 서현우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 이시영 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 미생물학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Kim, Jaeyong (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Howon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Lee, Juhyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Seo, Hyunwoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Lee, Siyoung (Department of Oral Microbiology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.14
  • 심사 : 2017.09.12
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 치면세균막 착색제인 erythrosine을 광감각제로 사용하여 S. mutans에 광역동 치료를 시행하였을 때, 동일한 에너지량을 조사시 광원의 종류에 따른 항균능의 차이를 비교해보고자 함이다. S. mutans를 각각 planktonic 상태와 biofilm 상태로 형성한 후 $40{\mu}M$로 희석한 erythrosine을 3분간 처리한 다음 광원의 종류로 Halogen, LED, Plasma arc를 사용하였고 각각 30초, 15초, 9.5초의 광조사를 시행하였다. 실험 종료 후 각 실험군의 CFU를 측정하여 각 조건에 따른 광역동 치료 효과를 비교하였다. 각 실험군의 CFU는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. 동일 에너지량을 조사시 광역동 치료의 효과는 광원의 종류와 관계없이 동일하다고 할 수 있으며, 이는 다양한 광 조사 기기를 가진 임상현장에서도 유용한 결과라 할 수 있다.

In a photodynamic therapy, the difference of antibacterial capacity was compared according to the type of source of light when the same quantity of energy is irradiated. After S. mutans is formed in planktonic state and biofilm state, erythrosine diluted to $40{\mu}M$ was treated for 3 minutes, and as the type of light source, Halogen, LED, and Plasma arc were used, which were irradiated for 30 seconds, 15 seconds and 9.5 seconds, respectively. After the completion of the experiment, CFU of each experiment arm was measured to compare the photodynamic therapeutic effects according to each condition. The CFU of each experiment arm had no statistically significant difference. Under the same quantity of energy, the photodynamic therapeutic effect can be said to be the same regardless of types of light source, which is a useful result in the clinical field with various light irradiators.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Smith DJ : Dental caries vaccines: prospects and concerns. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med , 13:335-349, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130201300404
  2. Marsh PD : Microbiologic aspects of dental plaque and dental caries. Dent Clin North Am , 43:599-614, 1999.
  3. Loe H : Oral hygiene in the prevention of caries and periodontal disease. Int Dent J , 50:129-139, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00553.x
  4. Hoyle BD, Costerton JW : Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: the role of biofilms. Prog Drug Res , 37:91-105, 1991.
  5. Paschoal MA, Lin M, Santos-Pinto L, Duarte S : Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy on Streptococcus mutans using curcumin and toluidine blue activated by a novel LED device. Lasers Med Sci , 30:885-890, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1492-1
  6. Dougherty TJ : An update on photodynamic therapy applications. J Clin Laser Med Surg , 20:3-7, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1089/104454702753474931
  7. Konopka K, Goslinski T : Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res , 86:694-707, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600803
  8. Yildirim C, Karaarslan ES, Ozsevik S, et al . : Antimicrobial efficiency of photodynamic therapy with different irradiation durations. Eur J Dent , 7:469-473, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.120677
  9. Diniz IM, Horta ID, Azevedo CS, et al . : Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: a promise candidate for caries lesions treatment. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther , 12:511-518, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.04.006
  10. Quishida CC, Mima EG, Dovigo LN, et al . : Photodynamic inactivation of a multispecies biofilm using Photodithazine((R)) and LED light after one and three successive applications. Lasers Med Sci , 30:2303-2312, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1811-9
  11. Ricatto LG, Conrado LA, Turssi CP, et al . : Comparative evaluation of photodynamic therapy using LASER or light emitting diode on cariogenic bacteria: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent , 8:509-514, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.143634
  12. Wood S, Metcalf D, Devine D, Robinson C : Erythrosine is a potential photosensitizer for the photodynamic therapy of oral plaque biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother , 57:680-684, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl021
  13. Lee YH, Park HW, Lee JH, et al . : The photodynamic therapy on Streptococcus mutans biofilms using erythrosine and dental halogen curing unit. Int J Oral Sci , 4:196-201, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.63
  14. Chui C, Aoki A, Takeuchi Y, et al . : Antimicrobial effect of photodynamic therapy using high-power blue light-emitting diode and red-dye agent on Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontal Res , 48:696-705, 2013.
  15. Wilson BC, Patterson MS : The physics, biophysics and technology of photodynamic therapy. Phys Med Biol , 53: R61-109, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/9/R01
  16. Sharman WM, Allen CM, van Lier JE : Photodynamic therapeutics: basic principles and clinical applications. Drug Discov Today , 4:507-517, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(99)01412-9
  17. Soukos NS, Goodson JM : Photodynamic therapy in the control of oral biofilms. Periodontol 2000 , 55:143-166, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00346.x
  18. Nagata JY, Hioka N, Kimura E, et al . : Antibacterial photodynamic therapy for dental caries: evaluation of the photosensitizers used and light source properties. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther , 9:122-131, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2011.11.006
  19. Dougherty TJ, Gomer CJ, Henderson BW, et al . : Photodynamic therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 90:889-905, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.12.889
  20. Choi S, Park H, Lee J, et al . : Optimum Treatment Parameters for Photodynamic Antimicrobial Chemotherapy on Streptococcus mutans Biofilms. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent , 42:151-157, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2015.42.2.151
  21. Zanin IC, Goncalves RB, Junior AB, et al . : Susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans biofilms to photodynamic therapy: an in vitro study. J Antimicrob Chemother , 56:324-330, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki232
  22. Hope CK, Wilson M : Induction of lethal photosensitization in biofilms using a confocal scanning laser as the excitation source. J Antimicrob Chemother , 57:1227-1230, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl096
  23. Araujo PV, Teixeira KI, Lanza LD, et al . : In vitro lethal photosensitization of Streptococcus mutans using methylene blue and toluidine blue O as photosensitizers. Acta Odontol Latinoam , 22:93-97, 2009.
  24. Fracalossi C, Nagata JY, Pellosi DS, et al . : Singlet oxygen production by combining erythrosine and halogen light for photodynamic inactivation of Streptococcus mutans . Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther , 15:127-132, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.06.011
  25. Nomoto R, McCabe JF, Hirano S : Comparison of halogen, plasma and LED curing units. Oper Dent, 29:287-294, 2004.
  26. Jung JS, Park HW, Lee JH, et al . : The effect of photodynamic therapy on the viability of Streptococcus mutans isolated from oral cavity. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent , 39:233- 241, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2012.39.3.233
  27. Salva KA : Photodynamic therapy: unapproved uses, dosages, or indications. Clin Dermatol , 20:571-581, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-081X(02)00266-3
  28. Goulart Rde C, Bolean M, Paulino Tde P, et al . : Photodynamic therapy in planktonic and biofilm cultures of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Photomed Laser Surg, 28 Suppl 1:S53-60, 2010.
  29. Street CN, Pedigo LA, Loebel NG : Energy dose parameters affect antimicrobial photodynamic therapy-mediated eradication of periopathogenic biofilm and planktonic cultures. Photomed Laser Surg , 28 Suppl 1:S61-66, 2010.
  30. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP : Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science , 284: 1318-1322, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318