DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Soft story retrofit of low-rise braced buildings by equivalent moment-resisting frames

  • Received : 2017.02.10
  • Accepted : 2018.10.25
  • Published : 2018.12.10

Abstract

Soft-story buildings have bottom stories much less rigid than the top stories and are susceptible to earthquake damage. Therefore, the seismic design specifications need strict design considerations in such cases. In this paper, a four-story building was investigated as a case study and the effects of X-braces elimination in its lower stories studied. In addition, the possibility of replacement of the X-braces in soft-stories with equivalent moment resisting frame inspected in two different phases. In first phase, the stiffness of X-braces and equivalent moment-resisting frames evaluated using classic equations. In final phase, diagonals removed from the lowest story to develop a soft-story and replaced with moment resisting frames. Then, the seismic stiffness variation of moment-resisting frame evaluated using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses. The results show that substitution of braced frames with an equivalent moment-resisting frame of the same stiffness increases story drift and reduces energy absorption capacity. However, it is enough to consider the needs of building codes, even using equivalent moment resisting frame instead of X-Braces, to avoid soft-story stiffness irregularity in seismic design of buildings. Besides, soft-story development in the second story may be more critical under strong ground excitations, because of interaction of adjacent stories.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Islamic Azad University

References

  1. ANSI/AISC341 (2010), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., One East Wacker Drive, Suite 700, Chicago, Illinois 60601-1802.
  2. ANSI/AISC360 (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., One East Wacker Drive, Suite 700, Chicago, Illinois 60601-1802.
  3. ANSI/ASCE7 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineering, Virginia, U.S.A.
  4. ATC-40 (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, U.S.A.
  5. Chintanapakdee, C. and Chopra, A.K. (2004), "Seismic response of vertically irregular frames: Response history and modal pushover analyses", J. Struct. Eng., 130(8), 1177-1185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:8(1177)
  6. Dya, A.F.C. and Oretaa, A.W.C. (2015), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of soft story irregular buildings using pushover analysis", Proc. Eng., 125, 925-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.103
  7. Eurocode 8 (2003), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, European Committee for Standardization.
  8. Favvata, M.J., Maria, C.N. and Chris, G.K. (2013), "Limit states of RC structures with first floor irregularities", Struct. Eng. Mech., 47(6), 791-818. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.6.791
  9. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  10. Ghale-Noei, M., Azhdari-Moghadam, M. and Golkari, H. (2011), "Evaluation of the effect of soft-story on performance of structures with the capacity spectrum approach", Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Civil Engineering, Semnan, Iran, April.
  11. Guevara-Perez, L.T. (2012), "Soft story and weak story in earthquake resistant design: A multidisciplinary approach", Proceedings of the 15WCEE, Lisboan, Portugal, September.
  12. Guney, D. and Aydin, E. (2012), "The nonlinear effect of infill walls stiffness to prevent soft story collapse of RC structures", Open Constr. Build. Technol. J., 6.
  13. Haque, S. and Amanat, K.M. (2009), "Strength and drift demand of columns of RC framed buildings with soft ground story", J. Civil Eng. (IEB), 37(2), 99-110.
  14. Hejazi, F., Jilani, S., Noorzaei, J., Chieng, C.Y., Jaafar, M.S. and Ali, A.A. (2011), "Effect of soft story on structural response of high rise buildings", Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 17(1), 012034.
  15. Hui, L.J.L. (1994), "Experiment study of earthquake response of the soft first storey structure with hydraulic mass control system", J. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vibr., 3(4).
  16. Indian Standard (2005), National Building Code of India. Structural Design.
  17. Inel, M. and Ozmen, H.B. (2008), "Effect of infill walls on soft story behavior in mid-rise RC buildings", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  18. Jennings, E., Van de Lindt, J.W., Ziaei, E., Mochizuki, G., Pang, W. and Shao, X. (2014), "Retrofit of a soft-story woodframe building using SMA devices with full-scale hybrid test verification", Eng. Struct., 80, 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.021
  19. Lee, H.S., Dong, W.J., Kyung, B.L., Hee, C.K. and Kihak, L. (2011), "Shake-table responses of a low-rise RC building model having irregularities at first story", Struct. Eng. Mech., 40(4), 517-539. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.4.517
  20. Miyamoto, H.K. and Scholl, R.E. (1996), "Case study: Seismic rehabilitation of non-ductile soft story concrete structure using viscous dampers", Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, June.
  21. Mo, Y.L. and Chang, Y.F. (1995), "Application of base isolation concept to soft first story buildings", Comput. Struct., 55(5), 883-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)00433-4
  22. Moehle, J.P. and Alarcon, L.F. (1986), "Seismic analysis methods for irregular buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 112(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:1(35)
  23. National Standard of the People's Republic of China (2002), Code of Seismic Design of Buildings.
  24. Pang, W., Ziaei, E. and Filiatrault, A. (2012), "A 3D model for collapse analysis of soft-story light-frame wood buildings", Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, July.
  25. Pirizadeh, M. and Shakib, H. (2013), "Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of non-geometric vertically irregular steel buildings", Int. J. Constr. Steel Res., 82, 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.12.012
  26. Sahoo, D.R. and Rai, D.C. (2013), "Design and evaluation of seismic strengthening techniques for reinforced concrete frames with soft ground story", Eng. Struct., 56, 1933-1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.018
  27. Silva, P. and Badie, S. (2008), Optimum Beam-to-Column Stiffness Ratio of Portal Frames Under Lateral Loads, Structure Magazine.
  28. Tena-Colunga, A. (2010), "Review of the soft first story irregularity condition of buildings for seismic design", Open Civil Eng. J., 4, 1-15.
  29. Thornton, W.A., and Muir, L.S. (2009), "Design of vertical bracing connections for high-seismic drift", Mod. Steel Constr., 61-65.
  30. Tremblay, R. and Tirca, L. (2003), "Behavior and design of multi-story zipper concentrically braced steel frames for the mitigation of soft-story response", Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA), Naples, Italy, June.
  31. Trung, K.L. and Lee, K. (2008), "Seismic behavior and evaluation of steel SMF building with vertical irregularities", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  32. Turkish Standard (2007), Turkish Earthquake Code, Ankara, Turkey.
  33. Valmundsson, E.V. and Nau, J.M. (1997), "Seismic response of building frames with vertical structural irregularities", J. Struct. Eng., 123(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(30)
  34. Wibowo, A., Wilson, J.L., Lam, N.T. and Gad, E.F. (2010), "Collapse modelling analysis of a precast soft storey building in Australia", Eng. Struct., 32(7), 1925-1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.003
  35. Yoshimura, M. (1997), "Nonlinear analysis of a reinforced concrete building with a soft first story collapsed by the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake", Cement Concrete Compos., 19(3), 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00016-4