DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

1g shaking table tests on residual soils in Malaysia through different model setups

  • Lim, Jun X. (Department of Civil Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman) ;
  • Lee, Min L. (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia) ;
  • Tanaka, Yasuo (Department of Civil Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman)
  • Received : 2017.07.04
  • Accepted : 2018.10.11
  • Published : 2018.12.10

Abstract

Studies of soil dynamic properties in Malaysia are still very limited. This study aims to investigate the dynamic properties of two selected tropical residual soils (i.e., Sandy Clay and Sandy Silt) and a sand mining trail (Silty Sand) in Peninsular Malaysia using 1g shaking table test. The use of 1g shaking table test for soil dynamic testing is often constrained to large strain level and small confining pressure only. Three new experimental setups, namely large laminar shear box test (LLSBT), small chamber test with positive air pressure (SCT), and small sample test with suction (SSTS) are attempted with the aims of these experimental setups are capable of evaluating the dynamic properties of soils covering a wider range of shear strain and confining pressure. The details of each experimental setup are described explicitly in this paper. Experimental results show that the combined use of the LLSBT and SCT is capable of rendering soil dynamic properties covering a strain range of 0.017%-1.48% under confining pressures of 5-100 kPa. The studied tropical residual soils in Malaysia behaved neither as pure sand nor clay, but show a relatively good agreement with the dynamic properties of residual soils in Singapore. Effects of confining pressure and plasticity index on the studied tropical residual soils are found to be insignificant in this particular study.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS)

References

  1. Adnan, A. and Suradi, S. (2008), "Comparison on the effect of earthquake and wind loads on the performance of reinforced concrete buildings", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  2. Araei, A.A. and Towhata, I. (2014), "Impact and cyclic shaking on loose sand properties in laminar box using gap sensors", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 66, 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.004
  3. Balendra, T. and Li, Z. (2008), "Seismic hazard of Singapore and Malaysia", EJSE Special Issue Earthq. Eng. Low Moderate Seismic Reg. South East Asia Australia, 57-63.
  4. Bao, X.H., Morikawa, Y., Kondo, Y., Nakamura, K. and Zhang, F. (2012), "Shaking table test on reinforcement effect of partial ground improvement for group-pile foundation and its numerical simulation", Soil. Found., 52(6), 1043-1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.020
  5. Borden, R., Shao, L. and Gupta, A. (1996), "Dynamic properties of piedmont residual soils", J. Geotech. Eng., 122(10), 813-821. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:10(813)
  6. Brennan, A., Thusyanthan, N., and Madabhushi, S. (2005), "Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131(12), 1488-1497. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1488)
  7. BSI (1990), "Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes: Compressibility, permeability and durability tests", BS 1377-5: 1990, BSI, U.K.
  8. Budhu, M. (1984), "Nonuniformities imposed by simple shear apparatus", Can. Geotech. J., 21(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1139/t84-010
  9. Cheng, K.H. (2016), "Plate tectonics and seismic activities Sabah area", Trans. Sci. Technol., 3(1), 47-58.
  10. Darandeli, M.B. (2001), "Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves", Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, U.S.A.
  11. Dietz, M., and Muir Wood, D. (2007), "Shaking table evaluation of dynamic soil properties", Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, June.
  12. Enomoto, T. and Sasaki, T. (2015), "Several factors affecting seismic behaviour of embankments in dynamic centrifuge model tests", Soil. Found., 55(4), 813-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.013
  13. Gue, S.S. and Wong, S.Y. (2009), "Slope engineering design and construction practice in Malaysia", Proceedings of the CIE-IEM Joint Seminar on Geotechnical Engineering, Yilan, Taiwan, August.
  14. Hardin, B. and Drnevich, V. (1972), "Shear modulus and damping in soils measurement and parameter effects", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 98(6), 603-624.
  15. Hardin, B.O. and Black, W.L. (1968), "Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 94(SM2), 353-369.
  16. Huat, B.B.K., Toll, D.G. and Prasad, A. (2012), Handbook of Tropical Residual Soils Engineering, (1st Edition), CRC Press, London, Unite.
  17. Ishibashi, I. and Zhang, X. (1993), "Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping patios of sand and clay", Soil. Found., 33(1), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.182
  18. Ishikawa, A., Zhou, Y.G., Shamoto, Y., Mano, H., Chen, Y.M. and Ling, D.S. (2015), "Observation of post-liquefaction progressive failure of shallow foundation in centrifuge model tests", Soil. Found., 55(6), 1501-1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.10.014
  19. Kazama, M. and Yanagisawa, E. (1996), "Dynamic properties of soft clay directly obtained from centrifuge dynamic test", Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, June.
  20. Kazama, M., Toyata, H., Towhata, I. and Yanagisawa, E. (1996), "Stress strain relationship of sandy soils obtained from centrifuge shaking table tests", J. Geotech. Eng., 535, 73-82 (in Japanese).
  21. Koo, K.K., Lim, J.X., Yang, C.L., Lee, M.L., Tanaka, Y. and Zhao, J.J. (2017), "Shaking table test on dynamic behaviours of tropical residual soils in Malaysia", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 21(5), 1735-1746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1856-8
  22. Kramer, S.L. (2014), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education Limited, U.K.
  23. Lanzo, G., Vucetic, M. and Doroudian, M. (1997), "Reduction of shear modulus at small strains in simple shear", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 123(11), 1035-1042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:11(1035)
  24. Leong, E.C., Rahardjo, H. and Cheong, H.K. (2003), "Stiffness-strain relationship of Singapore residual soils", Proceedings of the 2003 Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand, February.
  25. Lim, J.X., Lee, M.L. and Tanaka, Y. (2017), "Systematic approaches for signal processing of soil shaking table test", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum (EACEF-2017), Seoul, South Korea, August.
  26. Liu, N., Huang, Q.B., Fan, W., Ma, Y.J. and Peng, J.B. (2018), "Seismic responses of a metro tunnel in a ground fissure site", Geomech. Eng., 15(2), 775-781. https://doi.org/10.12989/GAE.2018.15.2.775
  27. Nazri, F.M. and Alexander, N.A. (2012), "Predicting the collapse potential of structures", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September.
  28. Osaki, Y. (1995), New Introduction to Spectrum Analysis of Earthquake Ground Motion, Kajimashuppan, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
  29. Oztoprak, S. and Bolton, M.D. (2013), "Stiffness of sands through a laboratory test database", Geotechnique, 63(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.078
  30. Piersol, A. and Paez, T. (2010), Harris' Shock and Vibration Handbook, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, U.S.A.
  31. Shinoda, M., Nakajima, S., Nakamura, H., Kawai, T. and Nakamura, S. (2013), "Shaking table test of large-scaled slope model subjected to horizontal and vertical seismic loading using E-Defense", Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, France, September.
  32. Sooria, S.Z., Sawada, S. and Goto, H. (2012), "Proposal for seismic resistant design in Malaysia: Assessment of possible ground motions in Peninsular Malaysia", Ann. Disas. Prev. Res. Inst. Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, Japan, September.
  33. Suzuki, H., Tokimatsu, K. and Tabata, K. (2014), "Factors affecting stress distribution of a $3{\times}3$ pile group in dry sand based on three-dimensional large shaking table tests", Soil. Found., 54(4), 699-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.06.009
  34. Taha, M., Hossain, M., and Mofiz, S. (2000), "Behavior and modeling of granite residual soil in direct shear test", J. Inst. Eng. Malaysia, 61(2), 27 - 40.
  35. Tan, B.K. and Azwari, H.M. (2001), "Physio-chemical properties of carboneceauos shale soils in the Yong Peng area, Johor", Proceedings of the Geological Society of Malaysia Annual Geological Conference 2001, Pangkor Island, Perak, June.
  36. Tanaka, Y. and Lee, M.L. (2016), "Laboratory study on dynamic properties of compacted residual soils in Malaysia", Geotech. Eng. J. SEAGS AGSSEA, 47(4), 89-96.
  37. Tou, J.H. (2003), "Cyclic triaxial test apparatus for evaluating dynamic properties of residual soils", M.Sc. Thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang, Singapore.
  38. Tsai, C.C., Lin, W.C. and Chiou, J.S. (2016), "Identification of dynamic properties through shaking table tests on a large saturated sand specimen in a laminar shear box", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 83, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.007
  39. Vardanega, P.J. and Bolton, M.D. (2013), "Stiffness of clays and silts: Normalizing shear modulus and shear strain", Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 139(9), 1575-1589. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000887
  40. Wang, B., Zen, K., Chen, G.Q. and Kasama, K. (2012), "Effects of excess pore pressure dissipation on liquefaction-induced ground deformation in 1-g shaking table test", Geomech. Eng., 4(2), 157-164.
  41. Zarnani, S., El-Emam, M.M. and Bathurst, R.J. (2011), "Comparison of numerical and analytical solutions for reinforced soil wall shaking table tests", Geomech. Eng., 3(4), 291-321. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2011.3.4.291