DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

농산물 판매시 농가들의 정보화 기기 이용 선택 결정요인 분석

Analysis of Factors of Farmers' Use of Information Technology Equipment When Selling Agricultural Products

  • 이향미 (한국농어촌공사 농어촌연구원) ;
  • 고종태 (강원대학교 농업자원경제학과)
  • Yi, Hyangmi (Rural Research Institute) ;
  • Goh, Jongtae (Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.28
  • 심사 : 2018.11.26
  • 발행 : 2018.11.30

초록

By using the raw data of the 2015 Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Consensus that surveyed the farmers engaged in agriculture, forestry and fishery in 2015, this study investigated the effects of the characteristics of the farms in Gangwon-do on the utilization of the digital devices, which was classified into computers usage only, smartphones usage only, both computers and smartphones usage, and no digital device usage. This study used the Multinomial Logit Model for the above purpose. Moreover, the IIA(Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives) method of the Multinomial Logit Model was analyzed to be suitable. Upon the result of the analysis, when all the other variables were constant in the average, the probability of choosing both computers and smartphones increased by 0.02% as the family member living together with the farm owner increased by 1 person. In addition, the farms with agricultural machineries have 0.03% increased probability of using smartphones to sell their agricultural products, when compared with the farms without agricultural machinery. Moreover, for the farms with high sales profit of the agricultural products, the probability of using computers and the probability of using smartphones increased by 0.04% and 0.01%, respectively, and the probability of using both computers and smartphones increased by 0.02%. On the other hand, for the farms affiliated with the agricultural organization, the probability of using both computers and smartphones increased by 0.17%, and the probability of using only smartphones and the probability of using only computers increased by 0.16% and 0.15%, respectively. In case of selling to the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation(NACF), the probability of using smartphones increased by 0.11% if all other variables were to be constant in the average. In particular, the farms participating in the agriculture-related industries have 1.09% increased probability of using computers, have 0.92% increased probability of using smartphones, and 0.85% increased probability of using both computers and smartphones. Therefore, the implications suggested based on the results of the analysis are as follows. First, the farms' choices of the digital devices are made independently. Hence, the future agricultural industry business platform establishment should necessarily consider the types of farms' choices of the digital devices in the future. Second, since the usage of digital devices has a generally positive influence on the farm household income, digital education to improve farmers' ability to use the digital devices should be urgently provided in order to improve the farm household income in the farms in Gangwon-do. Third, because the digital devices used to sell agricultural products differ depending on the age of the farm owner, it would be desirable to target the younger generation of the farm owners rather than establishing the agricultural industry business platform for the farms in the aged farm villages. Fourth, it would be advisable for the future agricultural business platform to consider the characteristics of agricultural products sales source.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim MH, Kim YY, Kim JH (2013) A demand survey on the implementation of open service platform to facilitate the diffusion of convergence software for the welfare of Korea. Chungbuk National University, p 5.
  2. Kim YJ, Park YY, Park YG (2017) Development of Smart Agriculture Coping with the 4th Industrial Revolution. Korea Rural Economic Institute, p 45-57.
  3. Hirano CA, Hagiu A (2010) Platform strategy. Eastern Economic News Paper, p 22-30.
  4. Van Alstyne MW, Parker W, Choudary SP (2016) Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard business review, 94, p 16.
  5. Kim GH, Song CS, Im I (2015) Watch the world through the eyes of the platform. Sungan Books, p 70-78.
  6. Bae YN (2014) New ICT convergence strategy in agriculture, forestry and food, Information Policy Research, p 1-43.
  7. Ministry of Science and ICT.National Information Society Agency (2016) 2016 The report on the digital divide, p 36-50.
  8. Schwab K. (2016) The fourth industrial revolution. Penguin Group, p 10-55.
  9. Hong MY, Kim EJ (2015) Promotion direction and tasks of R & D for agriculture, forestry and fisheries food for realizing smart agriculture. KISTEP Issue Paper 2015-07, p 3-7.
  10. Lee JB, Kwon GS, Yun JS (2015) Analysis of status and inteligence system requirement on the industrial crops farmers at An-Dong region. The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture, 27, p 657-662. https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2015.27.5.657
  11. Yu CJ, Lee YM (2008) Analysis of the acceptive attitude of farmers for agricultural informatization. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, 42, p 43-52.
  12. Lee DP, Lee JH, Kim JS, Han GS (2001) The study on the situation and strategies for solving digital divide in rural area. Korea Rural Economic Institute, p 10-15.
  13. Nam SY, Cho JK, Lee SW (2007) The effects of eco-friendly farming and digital competence on agricultural income. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 29, p 45-62.
  14. Yu SJ, Cho JK, Lee SW (2006) The impact of computer applications on the improvement of farm household income. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 12, p 81-95.
  15. Lee SW, Lim HB, Cho JK (2004) Determinants and regional disparities of computer applications in Farming Households. The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics, 45, p 47-81.
  16. Ko SN (2005) Rural-agricultural integrated plan and informatization strategy in Korea. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 19, p 1761-1778.
  17. Bock G, Kim BB, Lee JK (2015) A comparative analysis of informatization Level for agricultural corporations and SMEs. The Journal of the KICS, 40, p 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2015.40.1.1
  18. Government of Korea. (2016). Annual report on national informatization in 2016, p 30-60.
  19. http://jp.fujitsu.com.