KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Improvement on Pedestrian Level of Service by Pedestrian Satisfaction - Focused on Lower Floor Building Use in Seoul -

보행만족도에 따른 보행서비스수준 지표개선 - 서울시 저층부 용도를 대상으로 -

  • 문영기 (홍익대학교 도시계획학과) ;
  • 김동준 (홍익대학교 도시계획학과) ;
  • 한제현 (홍익대학교 도시계획학과) ;
  • 강준모 (홍익대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2018.09.20
  • Accepted : 2018.09.28
  • Published : 2018.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to discriminate the pedestrian environment by simple calculation such as using the matrix from pedestrian level of service. However, the general use of pedestrian level of service cannot discriminate the environment of footpaths, especially in Seoul. Most of the passages in Seoul are showing level A, which means most passages are spacious, but pedestrians don't agree that passages are wide enough to walk. In conclusion, comparing the pedestrian level of service with pedestrian satisfaction in different circumstances such as use of building in lower floors. Test areas are 1,157 spots in Seoul. First, The new pedestrian level of service shows equally in all spots. Second, spots where the highest pedestrian satisfaction are mostly in level B or level C, thus planning the walkways in future, level B or level C is recommended in most cases.

본 연구에서는 현재 우리나라에서 보편적으로 활용되고 있는 보행서비스수준은 보행의 질과 환경을 평가하기에 변별력이 없다고 판단되어 보행만족도를 연계하여 변별력 있는 기준으로 활용될 수 있도록 제안을 하였다. 공간적 범위는 서울시를 대상으로 1,157개 지점으로 선정하였으며, 선행연구 및 이론적 고찰을 통하여 보행과 관련된 지표를 선정하였다. 첫째, 개선된 보행서비스수준을 재분류한 결과 기존 A등급으로 치중되었던 결과와 달리 보행서비스수준이 전반적으로 고르게 분포되었다. 둘째, 개선된 보행서비스 수준 중 B등급과 C등급에서 보행만족도가 가장 높게 측정되었다. 이는 향후 보행로 계획 시 적정 물리적 시설이 충족되도록 설계하는 것이 적합하다고 판단된다. 셋째, 군집유형별로 개선된 보행서비스수준을 보면 각 등급의 보행교통류율이 다르게 측정된 것을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 보행로계획 시 보행서비스수준을 측정할 때 주변 시설의 종류에 따라 개선된 보행서비스수준을 적용하는 것이 적합하다고 사료된다. 본 연구에서 제안한 개선된 보행서비스수준은 도시개발사업과 보행계획에 있어 보다 현실적이고 변별력 있는 기준으로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Point

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Traffic Flow Rate Formula

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Survey Point by Cluster Type

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Z Example of Classification Criteria

Table 1. Pedestrian Walking Service Levels and Qualitative Description

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Current Status of Pedestrian Environment and Pedestrian Space

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. K- Cluster Analysis

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. A Study on the Frequency of Pre - Research Indicators for Pedestrian Service Level

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Frequency Analysis of Pre - Research Indicators for Pedestrian Environment

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Average Walking Satisfaction Level by Cluster Type

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Pedestrian Service Levels by Cluster Types

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Correlation Analysis between Pedestrian Satisfaction and Pedestrian Service Level

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Average Walking Satisfaction Level by Cluster Type

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Pedestrian Service Level Point Before and After Indicator Improvement

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Correlation Analysis between Pedestrian Satisfaction and Pedestrian Service Level by Cluster Types

TMHHC2_2018_v38n6_979_t0011.png 이미지

References

  1. Abishiai, P., Joseph, L. S. and Ariela, U. (1983). "Pedestrian flow and level of service." Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 109, pp. 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1983)109:1(46)
  2. Allan, B. J. (1995). Great streets, Revised edition, MIT Press Ltd, Cambridge.
  3. Architectural Data (2017). Available at: http://open.eais.go.kr/ (Accessed: March 2, 2017).
  4. Ban, D. I. (2015). A study of improving standards for evaluating pedestrian level of service : focusing on the commercial walkway of Seoul, Master Thesis, University of Hanyang (in Korean).
  5. Bruce W. L., Aicp P. E., Venkat R. V. and Martin G. (2014). "Modeling the roadside walking environment: pedestrian level of service." Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1773, pp. 82-88.
  6. Gyeonggi Research Institute (2008). Pedestrian environment satisfaction study (in Korean).
  7. Huang, T. H. and Chiun, C. J. (2007). "Modeling level of service on pedestrian environment." The 7th International Conference of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 226-236.
  8. Jang, Y. J. (2010). The study on assessment of walking environment using conjoint analysis, Master Thesis, University of Myongji (in Korean).
  9. Jasmina, B. T. and Marija, M. T. (2012). "Contribution to sidewalk pedestrian level of service analysis." Journal of Transport Problems, Vol. 7, pp. 5-13.
  10. John, M., Jeremy, B. and Nicholas, C. (2014). "Calibrating pedestrian level of service metrics with 3D visualization." Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1705, pp. 9-15.
  11. Jonathan, B. and Virginia, P. S. (2006). "Comparison of level of service methodologies for pedestrian sidewalks." Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting Conference.
  12. Jyeon, S. W. (2014). "A study on the improvement method of level of service analysis for pedestrian sidewalk through pedestrian space." Master Thesis, University of Myongji (in Korean).
  13. Jyeon, S. W. and Son, Y. T. (2016). "A study on the improvement method of level of service analysis for pedestrian sidewalk through pedestrian space." Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 168-179 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2016.34.2.168
  14. Jyeong, T. W. (2013). A study on the evaluation of pedestrian level of service in shared space based on pedestrian safety, Master Thesis, University of Gachon (in Korean).
  15. Kim, D. J. and Lee, Y. Y. (2012). "A study on assessment method for level of service of pedestrian road types." Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society, Vol. 2012, No. 1, pp. 636-641 (in Korean).
  16. Kim, J. H., Oh, Y. T., Son, Y. T. and Park, W. S. (2002). "A study on estimating level-of-service for pedestrian facilities." Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 149-156 (in Korean).
  17. Kim, K. H, Park, S. H. and Kim, D. H. (2006). "Estimating the Level-Of-Service for Walkways by Using Fuzzy Approximate Reasoning." Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 241-250 (in Korean).
  18. Kim, K. H. (1999). "Evaluation criteria of the walkway level-of-service in Korea." Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 31-46 (in Korean).
  19. Kim, K. Y, Kim, H. C. and Oh, S. H. (2002). "Characteristic analysis of pedestrian behavior on local street in residential area." Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 197-205 (in Korean).
  20. Kim, K. Y., Park, S. H. and Kim, D. H. (2006). "Estimating the level-of-service for walkways by using fuzzy approximate reasoning." Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 241-250 (in Korean).
  21. Kim, S. M. (2008). The study on the level of service standard evaluation with the walkway through the pedestrian conflicting analysis, Master Thesis, University of Seoul (in Korean).
  22. Kim, S. M. (2011). The Study on the Level of Service Standard Evaluation with the Walkway through the Pedestrian Conflicting Analysis, Master Thesis, University of Seoul (in Korean).
  23. Kim, T. H. (2008). A development of evaluation criteria for the network-wide pedestrian quality of service toward sustainable pedestrian environment, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hanyang (in Korean).
  24. Kim, T. H. (2008). A development of evaluation criteria for the network-wide pedestrian quality of service toward sustainable pedestrian environment, Ph.D.Dissertation, University of Hanyang (in Korean).
  25. Kim, Y. S. and Choi, J. S. (2006). "A balanced approach to the planning and design of urban streets." Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 55-64 (in Korean).
  26. Lee, C. H. (2007). Improvement for pedestrian environment of older pedestrians, Master Thesis, University of Hanbat (in Korean).
  27. Lee, J. A. (2014). The effect of street and block structure on street vitalization : focused on the commercial streets in Seoul, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hanyang (in Korean).
  28. Lee, J. K. (2010). Evaluation of vehicle & Ped. environments in urban streets using grey system theory, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Myongji (in Korean).
  29. Lei, K., Yingge, X. and Fred, L. M. (2013). "Statistical anlaysis of pedestrian percetions of sidewalk level of service in the presence of bicycles." Journal of Transportation Research PartA: Policy and Practice, Vol. 53, pp. 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.05.002
  30. Lim, J. K, Shin, H. S. and Kim, H. C. (2004). "New Pedestrian Level of Service by Trip Purpose and Walkway Function." Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 723-728 (in Korean).
  31. Lim, J. K. and Kim, H. C. (2003). "New pedestrian level of service by trip purpose and walkway function." Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 1-6 (in Korean).
  32. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2017). Building code (in Korean).
  33. National legal information center (2017). Available at: http://www.law.go.kr/main.html/ (Accessed: March 2, 2017).
  34. Nursyamsu, H., Kasem, C. and Kunihiro, K. (2011). "Pedestrian level of service model incorporating pedestrian perception for sidewalk with vendor activities." Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 9, pp. 1012-1023.
  35. Prianka, N. S. (1985). "Level of service on pedestrian facilities." Journal of Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 39, pp. 109-123.
  36. Public Data (2017). Available at: http://www.data.go.kr/ (Accessed: March 2, 2017).
  37. Seoul Metropolitan City (a) (2017). Available at: http://data.seoul.go.kr/ (Accessed: March 2, 2017).
  38. Seoul Metropolitan City (b) (2017). Available at: http://stat.seoul.go.kr/jsp3/index.jsp/ (Accessed: March 2, 2017).
  39. Seoul Metropolitan City (c) (2017). Available at: http://www.seoul.go.kr/main/index.html/ (Accessed: March 2, 2017).
  40. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2013). 2012 Seoul Floating population survey (in Korean).
  41. Sisiopiku, V. P. (2006). "Comparison of level of service methodologies for pedestrian sidewalks." Transportation Research Board.
  42. Soren, U. J. (2007). "Pedestrian and bicyclist level of service on roadway segments." The Bicycle Transportation Committee.
  43. Suck, J. S. (2010). "Study on assessment models for the pedestrian environment level." The Incheon Institute (in Korean).
  44. Tan D., Wang W., Lu J. and Bian Y. (2007). "Research on methods of assessing pedestrian level of service for sidewalk." Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 7, pp. 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-6672(07)60041-5
  45. The Office of Legislation (2017). Available at: http://www.moleg.go.kr/main.html/ (Accessed: March 2, 2017).
  46. Yordphol, T. and Jocelyn, A. G. (1989). "Level of service standards for pedestrian facilities in bangkok: a case study." Journal of ITE, Vol. 59, pp. 39-41.