Table 1. Correlation between weekly and overall average scores of three types of assessment on scientific creativity, originality, and usefulness
Table 2. The average scores and standard deviations of three types of assessment on scientific creativity and its two essential components
Table 3. Correlation among three types of assessment on scientific creativity
Table 4. Correlation among three types of assessment on originality
Table 5. Frequency differences of scientific creativity for objective assessment on student self-assessment
Table 6. Type distribution according to the scores’ levels of student self-assessment and teacher-assessment on scientific creativity
Table 7. The number of students who got the higher scores of originality than those of usefulness in student self-assessment and teacher-assessment
Table 8. The number of students who had more than 1 point of the difference between originality and usefulness scores in student self-assessment and teacher-assessment
Table 9. The responses of students with the greatest difference between originality and usefulness scores in student self-assessment and teacher-assessment
Table 10. Characteristics of individual students’ activities by the scores’ levels of student self-assessment and teacher-assessment on scientific creativity
참고문헌
- 곽금주, 정윤경, 김민화(2010). 아동발달심리학. 서울: 박학사.
- 교육부(2015). 초․중등학교 교육과정 총론. 교육부 고시 제 2015-74호 [별책 1].
- 김원경, 우남희(2002). 아동의 창의성에 대한 심리적 관련 변인 연구. 아동학회지, 23(2), 1-16.
- 신지은, 한기순, 정현철, 박병건, 최승언(2002). 과학 영재 학생과 일반 학생은 창의성에서 어떻게 다른가? - 서울대학교 과학영재교육센터 학생들을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), 158-175.
- 임채성(2012). 뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 창의적 과학 문제해결 지도 모형 개발. 생물교육, 40(4), 429-452.
- 임채성(2014). 과학창의성 평가 공식의 개발과 적용. 초등과학교육, 33(2), 242-257.
- Barbera, E. (2009). Mutual feedback in e-portfolio assessment: an approach to the netfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00803.x
- Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: the reflective initiative. Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2
- Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138746
- Bouzidi, L. & Jaillet, A. (2009). Can online peer assessment be trusted? Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 257-268.
- Butler, R. (1990). The effects of mastery and competitive conditions on self-assessment at different ages. Child Development, 61, 201-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131059
- Callahan, C. M. & Miller, E. M. (2005). A child-responsive model of giftedness. Conceptions of Giftedness, 2, 38-51.
- Carmines, E. G. & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17). Sage publications.
- Chan, D. W. (2005). Self-perceived creativity, family hardiness, and emotional intelligence of Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2-3), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-471
- Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H. & Lou, S. J. (2012). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education, 58(1), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.005
- Cho, K., Schunn, C. & Wilson, R. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891-901. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891
- Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teachers and educators. Psychology Press.
- Fox, S. & Dinur, Y. (1988). Validity of self-assessment: A field evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 581-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00645.x
- Hu, W. & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
- Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F. III. & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner (6th Ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
- Lin, S.-J., Liu, Z.-F. & Yuan, S.-M. (2001a). Web-based peer assessment: Attitude and achievement. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(2), 13.
- Lin, S.-J., Liu, Z.-F. & Yuan, S.-M. (2001b). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
- Liu, Z.-F. (2002). Studies of networked peer assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Hsinchu: National Chiao Tung University.
- LoCicero, K. A. & Ashby, J. S. (2000). Multidimensional perfectionism in middle school age gifted students: A comparison to peers from the general cohort. Roeper Review, 22(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554030
- Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403
- Musante, K. & DeWalt, B. R. (2010). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Rowman Altamira.
- Newton, L. & Newton, D. (2010). Creative thinking and teaching for creativity in elementary school science. Gifted and Talented International, 25(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673575
- Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science.
- Plake, B. S. & Impara, J. C. (1996). Teacher assessment literacy: What do teachers know about assessment?. In Handbook of classroom assessment (pp. 53-68).
- Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Conception of giftedness and its relationship to the development of social capital. Handbook of Gifted Education, 3, 75-87.
- Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 11(10). Retrieved January 31, 2009 from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=10
- Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C. & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1999). Effect of self-evaluation on narrative writing. Assessing Writing, 6(1), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-2935(99)00003-3
- Sadler, P. & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
- Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. & Witmer, S. (2012). Assessment: In special and inclusive education. Cengage Learning.
- Sowden, P. T. & Dawson, L. (2011, November). Creative feelings: The effect of mood on creative ideation and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 393-394). ACM.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1998, Ed.). Handbook of human creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Chiou, S.-K. & Hou, H.-T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self- and peer-assessment system. Computers and Education, 45(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.002
- Treffinger, D. J. (2009). Myth 5: Creativity is too difficult to measure. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 245-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346829
- Treffinger, D., Young, G., Shelby, E. & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing creativity: A guide for educators (RM02170). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
- Tsai, C.-C. & Liang, J.-C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37, 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0
- Tseng, S.-C. & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
- Walker, C. & Gleaves, A. (2008). An exploration of students' perceptions and understandings of creativity as an assessment criterion in undergraduate-level studies within higher education. Irish Educational Studies, 27(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323310701837855
- Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. WH Freeman New York.
- Yager, R. E. (2000). A vision for what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17327.x
피인용 문헌
- 초등과학영재학생의 자기 평가, 동료 평가의 비교 분석 vol.38, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.4.439