Child Health Nursing Research

Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing (한국아동간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement Properties of Self-Report Questionnaires Measuring the Social Adjustment for Youth after Treatment of Childhood Cancer: Systematic Review

소아암 치료 종료 후 청소년의 사회적응 자가 보고 설문지의 측정 속성: 체계적 문헌고찰

  • Oh, Su-Mi (National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency.Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Sun-Young (National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency) ;
  • Lee, Hye-Jung (College of Nursing, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Ju Hee (College of Nursing, Yonsei University)
  • 오수미 (한국보건의료연구원.연세대학교 일반대학원 간호학과) ;
  • 박선영 (한국보건의료연구원) ;
  • 이혜정 (연세대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 이주희 (연세대학교 간호대학)
  • Received : 2017.12.12
  • Accepted : 2018.01.15
  • Published : 2018.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate measurement properties of self-report questionnaires measuring the social adjustment for youth after treatment of childhood cancer. Methods: Social adjustment measurement tools were identified through a two-stage systematic review. First, we searched for articles using self-report questionnaires to measure the social adjustment of youth after the treatment of childhood cancer. The appropriate tools were listed and categorized. Second, using methodological filters, we searched 5 electronic databases for articles examining the measurement properties of the tools when used with youth after the treatment of childhood cancer. The quality of these papers was then evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: Eight tools were frequently used to measure social adjustment. Eight studies investigated the measurement properties of 4 of these tools. The PedsQL 4.0 and MMQL-AF had moderate to strong evidence in some domains, but the rest of the domains had a lack of evidence. The SF-36 and KIDSCREEN-27 were validated for only a few areas. Conclusion: We found a lack of evidence regarding the measurement properties of these tools. More research is required on the measurement properties of tools for use in this population.

Keywords

References

  1. Roberts RM, Robins T, Gannoni AF, Tapp H. Survivors of childhood cancer in South Australia attending a late-effects clinic: A descriptive report of psychological, cognitive, and academic lateeffects. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2014;32(2):152-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2013.873998
  2. Han SY, Hwang JH, Kim CH, Jang HY, Bang KS. A systematic review of interventions with siblings of pediatric cancer patients. Child Health Nursing Research. 2017;23(3):394-404. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2017.23.3.394
  3. Chen CM, Chen YC, Haase JE. Games of lives in surviving childhood brain tumors. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2008;30(4):435-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945907303050
  4. Takei Y, Ogata A, Ozawa M, Moritake H, Hirai K, Manabe A, et al. Psychosocial difficulties in adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatrics International. 2015;57(2):239-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.12495
  5. Langeveld NE, Stam H, Grootenhuis MA, Last BF. Quality of life in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2002;10(8):579-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-002-0388-6
  6. Weissman MM. The assessment of social adjustment. a review of techniques. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1975;32(3):357-365. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1975.01760210091006
  7. Cavell TA. Social adjustment, social performance, and social skills: A tri-component model of social competence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1990;19(2):111-122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1902_2
  8. Eiser C, Havermans T. Long term social adjustment after treatment for childhood cancer. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1994;70(1):66-70. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.70.1.66
  9. Hocking MC, McCurdy M, Turner E, Kazak AE, Noll RB, Phillips P, et al. Social competence in pediatric brain tumor survivors: Application of a model from social neuroscience and developmental psychology. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2015;62(3):375-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25300
  10. Havighurst RJ. Developmental tasks and education. 3rd ed. New York: Longman Inc.; 1972. p. 43-82.
  11. Son SY. Illness experience of adolescents with hematologic malignancies. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2011;41(5):603-612. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.5.603
  12. Cho EJ, Park ES. Adaptation experience and social support network of adolescent cancer survivors. Child Health Nursing Research. 2017;23(2):238-248. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2017.23.2.238
  13. Oh SM, Lee HJ, Kim GS, Park KD. Factors affecting social adjustment of childhood cancer survivor. Child Health Nursing Research. 2013;19(3):238-245. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2013.19.3.238
  14. Fuemmeler BF, Elkin TD, Mullins LL. Survivors of childhood brain tumors: Behavioral, emotional, and social adjustment. Clinical Psychology Review. 2002;22(4):547-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00120-9
  15. Punyko JA, Gurney JG, Scott Baker K, Hayashi RJ, Hudson MM, Liu Y, et al. Physical impairment and social adaptation in adult survivors of childhood and adolescent rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the childhood cancer survivors study. Psycho-Oncology. 2007; 16(1):26-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1072
  16. Gerhardt CA, Vannatta K, Valerius KS, Correll J, Noll RB. Social and romantic outcomes in emerging adulthood among survivors of childhood cancer. The Journal of Adolescent Health. 2007;40(5):462.e9-462.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.12.004
  17. Lee EH, Kim CJ, Kim EJ, Chae HJ, Cho SY. Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires published in Korean nursing journals. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(1):50-58. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.1.50
  18. Unesco. What do we mean by "youth"? [Internet]. Paris: Unesco; [cited 2017 Feburary 16]. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/th emes/youth/youth-definition/.
  19. Hanratty J, Livingstone N, Robalino S, Terwee CB, Glod M, Oono IP, et al. Systematic review of the measurement properties of tools used to measure behaviour problems in young children with autism. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0144649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144649.
  20. Kim SY, Park JE, Seo HJ, Lee YJ, Jang BH, Son HJ, et al. Neca's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention [Internet]. Seoul: National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency; 2011 [cited 2016 September 20]. Available from: https://www.neca.re.kr/lay1/bbs/S1T11C102/F/39/view.do?article_seq=5329&cpage=2&rows=10&condition=&keyword=&show=&cat=0.
  21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62(10):1006-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
  22. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research . 2009;18(8):1115-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5
  23. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2010;63(7):737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
  24. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COS MIN checklist. Quality of Life Research. 2012;21(4):651-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
  25. Christie D, Viner R. Adolescent development. BMJ. 2005;330:301-304. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7486.301
  26. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  27. DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2007;39(2):155-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
  28. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual [Internet]. Amsterdam: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments; 2012 [Cited 2017 May 25]. Available from: http://www.cosmin.nl/cosmin_checklist.html.
  29. Yang FM, Kao ST. Item response theory for measurement validity. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry. 2014;26(3):171-177. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.03.010
  30. Kane RL. Understanding health care outcomes research. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers Inc.; 2006. p. 133.

Cited by

  1. Systematic Review of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index used for Measuring Sleep Quality among Adults with Trauma Experiences vol.31, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2019.31.4.337
  2. A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties of Spirituality related Assessment Tools Published in Korean Journals vol.28, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2021.28.1.133
  3. Research trends related to childhood and adolescent cancer survivors in South Korea using word co-occurrence network analysis vol.27, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2021.27.3.201