ETRI Journal

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (한국전자통신연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of V2V Broadcast Performance Limit for WAVE Communication Systems Using Two-Ray Path Loss Model

  • Received : 2016.06.17
  • Accepted : 2017.02.03
  • Published : 2017.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The advent of wireless access in vehicular environments (WAVE) technology has improved the intelligence of transportation systems and enabled generic traffic problems to be solved automatically. Based on the IEEE 802.11p standard for vehicle-to-anything (V2X) communications, WAVE provides wireless links with latencies less than 100 ms to vehicles operating at speeds up to 200 km/h. To date, most research has been based on field test results. In contrast, this paper presents a numerical analysis of the V2X broadcast throughput limit using a path loss model. First, the maximum throughput and minimum delay limit were obtained from the MAC frame format of IEEE 802.11p. Second, the packet error probability was derived for additive white Gaussian noise and fading channel conditions. Finally, the maximum throughput limit of the system was derived from the packet error rate using a two-ray path loss model for a typical highway topology. The throughput was analyzed for each data rate, which allowed the performance at the different data rates to be compared. The analysis method can be easily applied to different topologies by substituting an appropriate target path loss model.

Keywords

References

  1. P. Papadimitratos et al., "Vehicular Communication Systems: Enabling Technologies, Applications, and Future Outlook on Intelligent Transportation," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, no. 11, Nov. 2009, pp. 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.5307471
  2. IEEE802.11, IEEE Standard for Information Technology-Telecommunication and Information Exchange Between Systems Local and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific Requirements Part11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012.
  3. Y.J. Li, An Overview of the DSRC/WAVE Technology: Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness in Heterogeneous Networks, Huston, TX, USA: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 544-558.
  4. J.B. Kenney, S. Barve, and V. Rai, "Comparing Communication Performance of DSRC OBEs from Multiple Supplies," ITS World Congress, Vienna, Austria, Oct. 22-26, 2012, pp. 80-87.
  5. ITS Joint Program Office, Connected Vehicle Safety Pilot, OST-R, US Department of Transportation, 2012, Accessed July 9, 2016. http://www.its.dot.gov/safety_pilot
  6. Matthias Schulze, Drive C2X, European Commission, 2014, Accessed July 9, 2016. http://www.drive-c2x.eu/project
  7. Y.S. Song, S.W. Lee, and H.S. Oh, "Performance Evaluation of WAVE Communication Systems under a High-speed Driving Condition in a Highway," J. Korea Inst. Intell. Trans. Syst., vol. 12, no. 3, 2013, pp. 96-102. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2013.12.3.096
  8. S.-C. Kim, "An Evaluation of the Performance of Wireless Network in Vehicle Communication Environment," J. Korean Inst. Commun. Inform. Sci., vol. 36, no. 10A, 2011, pp. 816-822. https://doi.org/10.7840/KICS.2011.36A.10.816
  9. J. Maurer, T. Fügen, and W. Wiesbeck, "Physical Layer Simulations of IEEE802.11a for Vehicle to Vehicle Communications," IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., Dallas, TX, USA, Sept. 25-28, 2005, pp. 1849-1853.
  10. Y. Zang et al., "An Error Model for Inter-vehicle Communications in Highway Scenarios at 5.9 GHz," ACM Int. Workshop Performance Evaluation Wireless Ad-hoc, Sensor, Ubiquitous Netw., Quebec, Canada, Oct. 10-13, 2005, pp. 49-56.
  11. Y. Xiao and J. Rosdahl. "Throughput and Delay Limits of IEEE 802.11," IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 6, no. 8, Aug. 2002, pp. 355-357. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2002.802035
  12. E.S. Ha, "Throughput Analysis of Packet Applied to the Transmission Probability for CSMA/CA Protocol in Wireless LAN," J. Internet Comput. Services, vol. 10, no. 1, 2009, pp. 51-61.
  13. C. Campolo et al., "Modeling Broadcasting in IEEE 802.11 p/WAVE Vehicular Networks," IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 15, no. 2, Dec. 2011, pp.199-201. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2011.122810.102007
  14. Y.P. Fallah et al., "Analysis of Information Dissemination in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks with Application to Cooperative Vehicle Safety Systems," IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 60, no. 1, Oct. 2010, pp. 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2010.2085022
  15. X. Ma and X. Chen, "Delay and Broadcast Reception Rates of Highway Safety Applications in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks," Mobile Netw. Veh. Environments, Anchorage, AK, USA, May 11, 2007, pp. 85-90.
  16. Y. Wang et al., "Reliability Evaluation of IEEE 802.11 p-Based Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication in an Urban Expressway," Tsinghua Sci. Technol., vol. 20, no. 4, Aug. 2015, pp. 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1109/TST.2015.7173456
  17. M.E. Renda et al., "IEEE 802.11 p VANets: Experimental Evaluation of Packet Inter-reception Time," Comput. Commun., vol. 75, Feb. 2016, pp. 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2015.06.003
  18. A. Goldsmith, "Wireless Communication," Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 182.
  19. S. Mangold, S. Choi, and N. Esseling, "An Error Model for Radio Transmission of Wireless LANs at 5GHz," Achen Signal Theory, Aachen, Germany, Sept. 2001, pp. 209-214.
  20. A.J. Viterbi, "Convolutional Codes and Their Performance in Communication Systems," IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., vol. 19, no. 5, Oct. 1971, pp. 751-772. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1971.1090700
  21. J. Conan, "The Weight Spectra of Some Short Low-Rate Convolutional Codes," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 32, no. 9, Sept. 1984, pp. 1050-1053. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1984.1096180
  22. D. Haccoun and G. Begin, "High-Rate Punctured Convolutional Codes for Viterbi and Sequential Decoding," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 37, no. 11, Nov. 1989, pp. 1113-1125. https://doi.org/10.1109/26.46505
  23. M.K. Simon and M.S. Alouini, Digital Communication over Fading Channels, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2005, p. 24.
  24. T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall PRT, 2002, pp. 120-125.
  25. C. Dou and J.M. Chang, "An Analytical Model for Deriving Receiver Sensitivity and Minimum Transmit Power in 802.15.6 Wireless Body Area Networks," IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Workshop Series RF Wireless Technol. Biomed. Healthcare Applicat., Taipei, Sept. 21-23, 2015, pp. 138-140.
  26. SAE J2945TM, On-Board System Requirements for V2V Safety Communications, SAE, Warrendale, PA, USA, 2016.

Cited by

  1. Site Prediction Model for the over Rooftop Path in a Suburban Environment at Millimeter Wave vol.2019, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1371498
  2. Hybrid approach of parallel implementation on CPU-GPU for high-speed ECDSA verification vol.75, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02744-6
  3. Analysis of adjacent channel interference using distribution function for V2X communication systems in the 5.9-GHz band for ITS vol.41, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2018-0249
  4. PhySim-11p: Simulation model for IEEE 802.11p physical layer in MATLAB vol.12, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100580
  5. Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Resource Allocation with Radio Remote Head Grouping and Vehicle Clustering in 5G Vehicular Networks vol.10, pp.23, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10233015