STI Policy Review

과학기술정책연구원 (Science & Technology Policy Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Entrepreneurial Ecosystem - What Boosts Herders' Business Most in Mongolia?

  • 발행 : 2017.12.14
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Entrepreneurship is a creation of new combinations of goods and services. Today, every aspect of business operations has been changing, which we call development. The conventional business included production and manufacturing of goods and serving things the customer needed. Today, the business has changed form so that the demands of customers are shaped by the good or service which has been created by the businesses. Entrepreneurship in Mongolia is not a new concept but nowadays the number of entrepreneurs in Mongolia has grown sharply. Mongolia was a nomadic culture during its history and is probably the only nomadic culture left in the world today. Mongolian herders are the largest and the most powerful representation of successful entrepreneurs in Mongolia. Another practice of herders in the world are in Australia. Along with a comparison of the policy and government support system of Australia, this study intends to assess how 6 factors of the entrepreneurial ecosystem fit herders in Mongolia. As a result of this assessment, we propose policy to support the entrepreneurial mechanism of herders and identify cultural factors which support the existence of herding.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bolton W. K., & Thompson J. L. (2000). Entrepreneurs: Talent, temperament, technique. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann.
  2. Danforth, W., & Dash, M. (2017, January). Animal health, Mongolian wealth: Unlocking Mongolia's other treasure chest. Agricultural Industry Report. Mongolia International Capital Corporation (MICC).
  3. Hisrich, R. D. (1990). Entrepreneurship/intrapreneurship. American Psychologist, 45(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.209
  4. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). California; London, New Delhi: Sage.
  5. Eroglu, O., & Picak, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship, national culture and Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (16), pp. 146-151.
  6. Isenberg, D. (2011, May). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growthpolicy-20110620183915.pdf
  7. Khan Bank (n.d.). Herder Loan. Retrieved from https://www.khanbank.com/en/personal/product/93
  8. Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA). (2017). Sheepmeat Fast Facts 2017. Retrieved from https://www.mla.com.au/pricesmarkets/Trends-analysis/fast-facts/
  9. McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992). More like each other than anyone else? A cross-cultural study of entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90017-L
  10. Onuoha, G. (2007). Entrepreneurship. AIST International Journal, 10, pp. 20-32.
  11. Schumpeter J. A. (1965). Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In H. G. Aitken (ed.), Explorations in enterprise. Cambridge, MA; Harrard University Press.
  12. Suwachananont, P., & Apibunyopas, P. (2016, June). Entrepreneurship and firm performance in small and medium restaurants. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th The IRES International Conference, Singapore, (pp. 11-14). ISBN: 978-93-86083-24-1
  13. Tran, A. T., & Von Korflesch, H. (2016). A conceptual model of social entrepreneurial intention based on the social cognitive career theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-12-2016-007
  14. Weber M. (1956). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Allen & Unwin.
  15. Yasin, M. (1996). Entrepreneurial effectiveness and achievement in Arab culture: New evidence to rekindle interest in an old predictor. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00050-X