DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Logistic, Bayesian, and Maxent Modelsfor Prediction of Landslide Distribution

산사태 분포 예측을 위한 로지스틱, 베이지안, Maxent의 비교

  • Al-Mamun, Al-Mamun (Department of Geography, Kongju National University) ;
  • Jang, Dong-Ho (Department of Geography, Kongju National University) ;
  • Park, Jongchul (Environmental Strategy Research Group, Korea Environment Institute)
  • 알-마문 (공주대학교 지리학과) ;
  • 장동호 (공주대학교 지리학과) ;
  • 박종철 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 미래환경연구본부)
  • Received : 2017.05.09
  • Accepted : 2017.06.18
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Quantitative forecasting methods based on spatial data and geographic information system have been used in predicting the landslide location. This study compared the simulated results of logistic, Bayesian, and maximum entropy models to understand the uncertainties of each model and identify the main factors that influence landslide. The study area is Boeun gun where 388 landslides occurred in the year of 1998. The verification results showed that the AUC of the three models was 0.84. However, the landslide susceptibility distribution of Maxent model was different from those of the other two models. With the same landslide occurrence data, the result of high susceptible area in Maxent model is smaller than Logistic or Bayesian. Maxent model, however, proved to be more efficient in predicting landslide than the other two models. In Maxent's simulations, the responsible factors for landslide susceptibility are timber age class, land cover, timber diameter, crown closure, and soil drainage. The results suggest that it is necessary to consider the possibility of overestimation when using Logistic or Bayesian model, and forest management around the study area can be an effective way to minimize landslide possibility.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단