농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)

  • 제23권4호
  • /
  • Pages.49-59
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-8857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9493(eISSN)
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society of Rural Planning)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

만다라트(Mandal-Art) 기법을 이용한 웹기반 농업용수 정보시스템 평가지표 개발

Development of Evaluation Indicators for Web-based Agricultural Water Information System using Mandal-Art Method

  • 김솔희 (서울대학교 그린바이오과학기술연구원) ;
  • 김찬우 (서울대학교 국제농업기술대학원) ;
  • 정찬훈 (서울대학교 국제농업기술대학원) ;
  • 박진선 (충북대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 김정대 (한국농어촌공사 농어촌연구원) ;
  • 서교 (서울대학교 국제농업기술대학원, 서울대학교 그린바이오과학기술연구원)
  • Kim, Solhee (Institute of Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chanwoo (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, Chanhoon (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Jinseon (Department of Agricultural and Rural Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jeongdae (Rural Research Institute, Korea Rural Community Corporation) ;
  • Suh, Kyo (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Institute of Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.06
  • 발행 : 2017.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The importance of information system evaluation has increased according to ICT development and this evaluation is required for objective verification. The aim of this study is to develop evaluation indicators for web-based information system and verify the availability of these evaluation indicators through applying to agricultural water integrated information system. This study finds and provides eight evaluation items and 64 indicators for a web-based information system using $3{\times}3$ Mandal-Art matrix that is a tool for creating creative ideas. These evaluation items are design, contents, navigation, stability, community, convenience, usefulness, and accuracy. Total 64 evaluation indicators were presented by deriving eight evaluation items for each using $9{\times}9$ Mandal-Art matrix. When evaluating information system using evaluation indicators, it can be identified the vulnerable items in the information system. Also, the comprehensive results of the information system could be understood when appearing a single score after weighting. In addition, it can also help to prepare a questionnaire for evaluation systematically.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adachi, M., Ito, E., and T. Fujimoto, 2013. Proposal on Divergent Web Search Engine with Mandal-Art. The 14th International Conference on Internet Computing (ICOMP'13).
  2. DeLone W.H. and E.R. McLean, 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1): 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  3. Eom, H. and K. Youn, 2007. Health Center Information Systems Evaluation Tool Development and Application in BSC Framework. Journal of the Korean Society of Health Information and Health Statistics. 32(1): 1-15.
  4. Hong, H. and Y. Noh, 2008. A Study on Modeling a Unified Policy Information Service System in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(1): 95-125. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.1.095
  5. Jo, J., Yang, D., and B. Choi, 2005. Investigation into Industrial Application of Creative Knowledge Creation Model Using Whole Brain Theory and Creative Thinking Tools. Knowledge Management Research. 6(2): 1-22.
  6. Jung, H. and S. Kim, 2003. An Empirical Study on Development of IS Evaluation Indices : In Case of Public Sectors. Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society. 28(4): 155-188.
  7. Jung, Y., 2010. Implementation Plan of Integrated Medical Information System for Ubiquitous Healthcare Service. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 15(2): 115-126.
  8. Kaplan R. and Norton D., 1992. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Havard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79.
  9. Kim, D., Kang, S., Kim, J., Kim, J., Kim, H. and J. Jang, 2017. Development and Implementation of Prototype for Intelligent Integrated Agricultural Water Management Information System and Service including Reservoirs managed by City and County. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 23(3): 163-174. https://doi.org/10.7851/Ksrp.2017.23.3.163
  10. Kim, D., Kim, J., Kim, J., Koo, H. and H. Lim, 2016. System Analysis for Water Management Information Strategy of Agricultural Reservoir managed by City and County. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 22(2): 165-173. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2016.22.2.165
  11. Kim, J., 2004. A Development of User Evaluation Index and A Performance Evaluation in City e-Government Websites: Fosused on Metropolitan Districts. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, 17(1): 33-54.
  12. Kim, J., 2005. An Exploratory Study on Developing an Evaluation Model of Web Site - Focused on Tourism Information website. The Journal of internet electronic commerce research. 6(1): 327-349.
  13. Kim, J. and S. Kang, 2016. Integrated Development of Intelligent Agricultural Water Information Service can Solve Flood and Drought in One Place. Rural Research Institute Focus, Korea Rural Community Corporation. 59(August).
  14. Kim, S., Lee, H., and H. Kwon, 2013. Evaluation Method and Application Examples for Availability Provision of National Defense Information System. Journal of Korea Institute for Defense Analyses. 1493: 13-50.
  15. Kim, T., Lee, J. and G. Kim, 2002. A Study on the Index Development of Website's Evaluation in Public Sector: Focused on Critical Review of Website's Evaluation Trends. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 33: 159-173.
  16. Martinsons M., Davison R., and Tse D., 1999. The Balanced Scorecard: a Foundation for the Strategic Management of Information Systems. Decision Support Systems, 25: 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00086-4
  17. Moon, T. and H, Moon, 2009. A Study on the Evaluation and Improvement Methods of Web Accessibility and Usability of Korea Government Department Websites. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 22(3): 1511-1535.
  18. National Information Society Agency, 2016. A Performance Measurement Manual of Information System Operation. Ministry of the Interior and Safety.
  19. Park C. and Y. Choi, 2002. The Trend and Index Emphasis of Website Evaluation Research: Focused on the Differences of Public and Private Organizations. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society. 10(2002-2): 191-258.
  20. Park J., and Y. Kang, 2005. Exploring Study for Web Accessibility Evaluation Technique. Kyung Young Nonchong publised by Business Research Center Dong-A University. 26: 181-193.
  21. Ryu, H. and G. Han, 2016. A Design Thinking Process with 'Aspie': Developing a New Intervention for People with Asperger's Syndrome. Hanyang Medical Review. 36(1): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2016.36.1.11
  22. Tseng, I., Moss, J., Cagan J. and K. Kotovsky, 2008. Overcoming Blocks in Conceptual Design: The Effects of Open Goals and Analogical Similarity on Idea Generation. Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; 2008 Aug 3-Aug 8; New York (NY), USA. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2008: 3-9.
  23. Yang, D., 2004. Creation and Use of $5{\times}5$ Mandal-Art, Seminar at KAIST and Personal Communication.