Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Meta Analysis of Preliminary Feasibility for Government R&D Programs to Improve Planning Project of the Government Funded Research Institutes

정부출연연구기관 주요사업 연구기획 강화를 위한 예비타당성조사 사업 메타분석연구

  • Lee, Jong-Won (Future Strategy & Convergence Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
  • 이종원 (한국건설기술연구원 미래융합연구소)
  • Received : 2017.10.11
  • Accepted : 2017.11.03
  • Published : 2017.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Korean government's recent R&D policy has focused on encouraging government-funded research institutes (GRIs) to develop mid-term, long-term, and large-scale R&D projects. It is necessary to prepare thoroughly for the new R&D strategy, but there is no systematic accumulation of planning expertise, and there has been continued demand for good examples of research planning. Therefore, this study analyzes the reports of preliminary feasibility for government R&D programs through a meta-analysis of detailed evaluation items and contents to help researchers enhance their project-planning ability. The evaluation items that can be applied to R&D planning for GRI were reviewed, and twelve detailed evaluation items were selected through content analysis. The results of this study could contribute to practical R&D project planning and the improvement of evaluations.

최근 정부 R&D 방향을 보면 정부출연연의 역할은 중장기, 대규모 신규사업발굴에 초점을 두고 있으며 출연연 자체적으로 연구기획에 많은 투자와 노력을 하고 있다. 하지만, 출연연 주요사업 연구기획에 철저한 준비가 되어야 함에도 기획 전문지식이 체계적으로 축적되지 않았으며 좋은 연구기획 본보기에 대한 요구가 지속적으로 이어져왔다. 이에 본 연구에서는 심도 있는 사전 검토 절차를 거치는 국가연구개발 예비타당성조사 사업 보고서를 본보기로 제안하고자 한다. 이를 위해 예비타당성조사의 계층구조와 세부평가항목을 고찰하고 주요사업 기획에 도움이 되는 세부평가항목들과 내용을 선별하고자 한다. 우선 현재 공개된 예비타당성조사 보고서 중에서 연구에 해당하는 대상을 선별하고, 보고서의 평가항목들 중에서 메타분석을 통해 출연연 주요사업 기획에 반영될 수 있는 12개 평가항목들을 선별하였다. 아울러, 전문가 회의를 거쳐 분석된 내용들에서 각 세부평가항목별 주요사업 기획관련 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구를 통해 주요사업 기획 연구자들에게 실무적으로 R&D 연구기획과 평가 향상에 기여할 것이라 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. G. Ahn, Y. G. Bae, "Key features of the government R & D budget in 2017", KISTEP Inside and Insight, pp. 28-40, 2017.
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology, Establishment of Increasing the concentration of major project investment Guideline, 2016.
  3. Government-funded Research Institute Innovation Committee, GRI innovation plan for public hearing presentation material, 2016.
  4. National Research Council of Science & Technology, Regulations for the main project of GRI, 2016.
  5. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning, Standard Guideline for Preliminary Feasibility Study of R&D Sector Projects (2-1), 2016.
  6. Berelson, B. Content analysis in communication research. New York: Free Press, 1952.
  7. S. T. Kim, "A meta analysis of content analysis research in Korea: Focusing on methodological elements for better content analysis research", Communication Theory, 1(2), pp. 39-67, 2005.
  8. S. J. Ahn, E. J. Park, Y. B. Lee, "Exploration of Life-cycle Management for Government R&D Program: the Case of Preliminary Feasibility Study on R&D Program," Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 124-145, 2014.
  9. S. J. Ahn, H. W. Kim, Y. B. Lee, "Study on Standard Framework for Analyzing Government R&D Program: the case of Preliminary Feasibility Study on R&D Program," Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 176-198, 2013.
  10. H. I. Kim, "A Study on the Revision of National Finance Law Through the Preliminary Feasibility Study System," Kookmin Law Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 115-151, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17251/legal.2013.26.2.115
  11. T. H. Kwon, "Critical Issues in Applying Multi-critera Analysis into Feasibility Studies of Public Projects," Korean Public Management Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 31-51, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24210/kapm.2008.22.3.002
  12. Go, Soo Jung and Ahn, Sung Jo, "A Study on the Applicability and the Method of Resilience of Preliminary Feasibility Study," The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 347-364, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.20.2.15
  13. G. H. Shin, Y. S. Ha, "A Study on the Political Acceptance of the Preliminary Feasibility Study System in the Budget Deliberation Process," The Korean Association for Public Administration workshop presentation file, pp. 1420-1445, 2014.
  14. M. Y, Oh, E. Y, Shon, J. Y. Kim, C. Y. Jung, "The Need on Comprehensive Evaluation Reforms in Preliminary Feasibility Study for Transportation Facilities Investment," Journal of Korea Planning Association, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 101-115, 2010.
  15. H. S. Sun, Y. M. Park, "Study on Consideration Plan of Environmental Influence in Preliminary Feasibility Investigation of Railroad Work," Korean Society for Railway workshop presentation file, pp. 23-28, 2006.
  16. M. P. Shim, Y. J. Yoon, "Standard Guideline for Preliminary Feasibility Survey of Water Resources Sector," Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 17-23, 2000.
  17. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning, Preliminary Feasibility for Government R&D Programs website, From: http://www.kistep.re.kr/c3/sub2_4.jsp (accessed Oct., 10, 2017)