참고문헌
- Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific argumentas learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. Internationa Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412284
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.3.CO;2-1.
- Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
- Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research.Dordre-Cht: Springer,
- Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849-871. doi:10.1080/0950069980200707.
- Mason, L. (1998). Sharing cognition to construct scientific knowledge in school context: The role of oral and written discourse. Instructional Science, 26(5), 359-389. doi:10.1023/A:1003103213786.
- McNeill, K. L., & KNIGHT, A. M. (2013). Teachers- pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K-12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
- Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2015). The influence of group dynamics on collaborative scientific argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2).
- Sadler, T. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448-484. doi:10.1002/sce.20306.
- Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260. doi:10.1080/09500690500336957.
- Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, U.K. ;: New York.
- van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Henkemans, F., Blair, J., Johnson, R., & Krabbe, E. (1996). al. 1996. fundamentals of argumentation theory. a handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Walton, D. N. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument?. The Journal of Philosophy, 87(8), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026735
- Walton, D. (1996). Argument structure: A pragmatic theory (toronto studies in philosophy) University of Toronto Press.
- Watson, J. R., Swain, J. R. L., & McRobbie, C. (2004). Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 25-45. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072764.
- 강남화, & 이은경. (2013). 논변, 논의 그리고 논증: 개념의 명료화를 위한 문헌조사 연구 = Argument and argumentation: A review of literature for clarification of translated words. 한국과학교육학회지, 33(6), 1119-1138. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1119
- 강순민(2004). 과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특성. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문.
- 교육부 (2015). 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 9].
- 남정희, 곽경화, & 장경화. (2008). 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science writing heuristic)의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용 = the implementation of argumentation using science writing heuristic(SWH) in middle school science. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), 922-936.
- 백종호, 정대홍, & 황세영. (2014). 탐구 실험을 활용한 과학교사 논변 과제 개발과정에서 드러난 쟁점 및 수정 효과: 기체에 대한 샤를의 법칙 실험 사례 = Issues and effects in developing inquiry-based argumentation task for science teachers: A case of charles' law experiment. 한국과학교육학회지, 34(2), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0079
- 신호심(2013). 다이어그램 분석과 정량적인 평가틀 이용한 과학 수업의 논의과정 분석. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문.