DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical simulation of unsteady propeller/rudder interaction

  • He, Lei (MODEC International, Inc.) ;
  • Kinnas, Spyros A. (Ocean Engineering Group, ECJ8.604, The University of Texas at Austin)
  • Received : 2016.05.19
  • Accepted : 2017.02.16
  • Published : 2017.11.30

Abstract

A numerical approach based on a potential flow method is developed to simulate the unsteady interaction between propeller and rudder. In this approach, a panel method is used to solve the flow around the rudder and a vortex lattice method is used to solve the flow around the propeller, respectively. An iterative procedure is adopted to solve the interaction between propeller and rudder. The effects of one component on the other are evaluated by using induced velocities due to the other component at every time step. A fully unsteady wake alignment algorithm is implemented into the vortex lattice method to simulate the unsteady propeller flow. The Rosenhead-Moore core model is employed during the wake alignment procedure to avoid the singularities and instability. The Lamb-Oseen vortex model is adopted in the present method to decay the vortex strength around the rudder and to eliminate unrealistically high induced velocity. The present methods are applied to predict the performance of a cavitating horn-type rudder in the presence of a 6-bladed propeller. The predicted cavity patterns compare well with those observed from the experiments.

Keywords

References

  1. Agishtein, M.E., Migdal, A.A., 1989. Dynamics of vortex surfaces in three dimensions: theory and simulations. Phys. D. Nonlinear Phenom. 40 (1), 91-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(89)90029-8
  2. Ashurst, W.T., Meiburg, E., 1988. Three-dimensional shear layers via vortex dynamics'. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 87-116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112088000928
  3. Brady, M., Leonard, A., Pullin, D.I., 1998. Regularized vortex sheet evolution in three dimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 146 (2), 520-545. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1998.5998
  4. Fujino, M., 1996. Prediction of Ship Manoeuvrability: State of the Art, in 'International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvrability'. Balkema, Rotterdam.
  5. Greeley, D.S., Kerwin, J.E., 1982. Numerical methods for propeller design and analysis in steady flow. Trans. Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng. 90, 415-453.
  6. Han, J., Kong, D., Song, I., Lee, C., 2001. Analysis of the cavitating flow around the horn-type rudder in the race of a propeller. In: Fourth International Symposium on Cavitation. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  7. Kinnas, S.A., Fine, N.E., 1993. A numerical nonlinear analysis of the flow around 2-d and 3-d partially cavitating hydrofoils. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 151-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112093002071
  8. Kinnas, S.A.,Hsin, C.-Y., 1992.Aboundary elementmethod for the analysis of the unsteady flowaround extreme propeller geometries.AIAA J. 30 (3), 688-696. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10973
  9. Kinnas, S.A., Lee, H., Gu, H., Natarajan, S., 2007. Prediction of sheet cavitation on a rudder subject to propeller flow. J. Ship Res. 51 (1), 65-75.
  10. Kracht, A.M., 1989a. Rudder in the slipstream of a propeller. In: 'Proceedings of International Symposium on Ship Resistance and Powering Performance', Shanghai, China.
  11. Kracht, A.M., 1989b. Ruderentwurf, Teil I. Technical Report 1137/89. Versuchsanstalt fur Wasserbau und Schiffbau.
  12. Lamb, S.H., 1932. Hydrodynamics. Cambrige University Press.
  13. Lee, C.S., 1979. Prediction of Steady and Unsteady Performance of Marine Propellers with and without Cavitation by Numerical Lifting Surface Theory. PhD thesis. Department of Ocean Engineering, MIT.
  14. Lee, H.S., 2002. Modeling of Unsteady Wake Alignment and Developed Tip Vortex Cavitation. PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin.
  15. Lee, H.S., Kinnas, S.A., Gu, H., Natarajan, S., 2003. Numerical modeling of rudder sheet cavitation including propeller/rudder interaction and the effects of a tunnel. In: 'CAV2003: Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation', Osaka, Japan.
  16. Lewis, F.M., 1973. Propeller Excited Hull and Rudder Force Measurements. Technical Report 73-10. MIT.
  17. Li, D.-Q., 1996. A non-linear method for the propeller-rudder interaction with the slipstream deformation taken into account. Comput. methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 130, 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(96)80458-0
  18. Minson, F., 1974. Propeller Tip Vortex Impingement and Vibratory Force on a Rudder. PhD thesis. Department of Ocean Engineering, MIT.
  19. Morino, L., Kuo, C.-C., 1974. Subsonic potential aerodynamic for complex configurations : a general theory. AIAA J. 12 (2), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49191
  20. Stierman, E.J., 1989. The influence of the rudder on propulsive performance - part I. Int. Shipbuild. Prog. 36, 303-334.
  21. Szantyr, J.,A., 2007. Mutual hydrodynamic interaction between the operating propeller and the rudder. In: 'HYDRONAV 2007', Polanica-Zdroj, Poland.
  22. Turnock, S., 1993. Prediction of ship rudder-propeller interaction using a panel method. In: '19th WEGEMT School. Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamics: Ships and Offshore Structures. Propeller and Lifting Surfaces', Nantes.
  23. Young, Y.L., 2002. Numerical Modeling of Supercavitating and Surfacepiercing Propellers. PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin.

Cited by

  1. Prediction of Propeller-Induced Hull Pressure Fluctuations via a Potential-Based Method: Study of the Effects of Different Wake Alignment Methods and of the Rudder vol.6, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6020052
  2. Numerical study on the hydrodynamic performance of the semi-spade rudder and propeller vol.11, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018823107
  3. Effect of Wake Alignment on Turbine Blade Loading Distribution and Power Coefficient vol.141, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041669
  4. Prediction of Unsteady Developed Tip Vortex Cavitation and Its Effect on the Induced Hull Pressures vol.8, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8020114
  5. Numerical Analysis of the Rudder-Propeller Interaction vol.8, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8120990
  6. The use of computational fluid dynamic technique in ship control design vol.16, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1706908
  7. Numerical simulation of structural response during propeller-rudder interaction vol.15, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.1899989
  8. Flow over a hydrofoil at incidence immersed within the wake of a propeller vol.33, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0075231