Legal Issues in Commercial Use of Space Resources: Legal Problems and Policy Implications of U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015

우주 자원의 상업적 이용에 관한 법적 문제 - 미국의 2015년 '우주 자원의 탐사 및 이용에 관한 법률' 의 구조와 쟁점 -

  • Kim, Young-Ju (Department of International Trade, Daegu University)
  • Received : 2017.06.12
  • Accepted : 2017.06.27
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

In Space contains valuable natural resources. These provide a compelling reason for entrepreneurs, investors, and governments to pursue space exploration and settlement. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 explicitly forbids any government from claiming a celestial resource such as the Moon or a planet. Article II of the Outer Space Treaty states that "outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means." The U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015 (CSLCA), however, makes significant advances in furthering U.S. commercial space industry, which explicitly allows U.S. citizens to engage in the commercial exploration and exploitation of 'space resources' including water and minerals. Thus, some scholars argue that the United States recognizing ownership of space resources is an act of sovereignty, and that the act violates the Outer Space Treaty. This paper suggests that it is necessary to guarantee the right to resources harvested in outer space. More specifically, a private ownership of extracted space resources needs to promote new space business and industry. As resources on Earth become increasingly difficult and expensive to mine, it is clear that our laws and policies must encourage private appropriation of space resources. CSLCA which addresses all aspects of space resource extraction will be one way to encourage space commercial activity.

우주 공간은 천연 자원의 보고로, 미래 인류의 지속적인 생존과 번영을 위해, 언젠가는 개척해야 할 영역이다. 문제는 우주에 존재하는 수많은 자원들의 수송, 이용, 처분과 같은 민간 차원의 배타적 소유권 행사가 국제법적으로 가능하냐는 것이다. 1967년 제정된 우주조약의 경우에는 우주에 대한 국가적 소유는 금지하고 있으나 사적 소유에 대하여는 아무런 규정을 두고 있지 않다. 따라서 민간 기업과 같은 사적 주체에 의한 우주 자원의 재산적 권리가 가능한 것은 아닌가 하는 해석을 할 수 있다. 지난 2015년 11월 25일 미국은, 이와 관련한 '상업우주발사경쟁력법'(CSLCA)을 제정하면서, 민간 기업의 소행성 자원과 우주 자원의 점유, 소유, 이용, 수송, 처분 등에 관한 재산적 권리를 명시적으로 인정하였다. 본 논문에서는 이와 같은 문제에 주목하여, 2015년 CSLCA의 구조와 법적 쟁점들을 검토해 보았다. 특히 우주 자원의 사적 소유권 쟁점을 중심으로, 국제우주법 체제의 제규정들과 비교 분석하였고, 이를 통해 CSLCA 제4편 SREU Act의 타당성 여부를 검증해 보았다. 결론은, 새로운 우주 시대를 위해 우주 자원의 '사적 소유권'을 보장할 필요가 있다는 것이다. 구체적으로는, 우주 천체와 우주 자원을 구분하여 파악하되, (1) 우주 천체로부터 분리되지 않은 비추출 우주 자원의 경우에는 사적 소유를 금지하며, (2) 우주 천체로부터 분리되어 추출된 우주 자원의 경우에는 사적 소유를 인정하여야 한다고 본다. 나아가 1967년 우주조약은 현대적 입법 환경에 맞추어, 새로운 우주 산업 시대를 보다 효율적으로 설계할 수 있는 방향으로 개선되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김두환, "세계 각국의 우주관계 입법례와 우리나라 우주 개발진흥법의 주요내용 및 앞으로의 과제", 항공우주법학회지 제20권 제1호, 한국항공우주법학회, 2005. 6.
  2. 김종복, 신우주법, 한국학술정보, 2011.
  3. 김한택, "우주의 평화적 이용에 관한 국제법 연구", 항공우주정책.법학회지 제30권 제1호, 한국항공우주정책.법학회, 2015. 6.
  4. 김한택, "우주조약의 국제법적 의미에 관한 연구", 항공우주정책.법학회지 제28권 제2호, 한국항공우주정책.법학회, 2013. 12.
  5. 박원화.정영진, 우주법, 제4판, 퍼플, 2013.
  6. 이강빈, "우주개발사업의 지속발전을 위한 국내입법의 개선방향에 관한 연구", 항공우주법학회지 제25권 제1호, 한국항공우주법학회, 2010. 6.
  7. 이영진, "상업적 우주활동의 국제법적 규제", 항공우주정책.법학회지 제28권 제2호, 한국항공우주정책.법학회, 2013. 12.
  8. Han-Taek Kim, A Comparative Study between Space Law and the Law of the Sea, 24 No. 2 Korean J. Air & Sp. L. 187 (2009).
  9. Hong Kyun Shin, A Study on Property Rights with respect to the Outer Space, 23 No. 1 Korean J. Air & Sp. L. 111 (2008).
  10. 靑木節子, 日本の宇宙戰略, 慶應義塾大學出版會, 2006.
  11. 小塚莊一郞.佐藤雅彦, 宇宙ビジネスのための宇宙法入門, 有斐閣, 2015.
  12. John Adolph, The Recent Boom in Private Space Development and the Necessity of an International Framework Embracing Private Property Rights to Encourage Investment, 40 Int'l Law. 961 (2006).
  13. Kurt Anderson Baca, Property Rights in Outer Space, 58 J. Air L. & Com. 1041 (1993).
  14. Kemal Baslar, The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998).
  15. James W. Benson, Space Resources: First Come First Served, in Managing Space Resources and Revitalizing Space Treaties, 41 Proc. on L. Outer Space 46 (1998).
  16. Richard B. Bilder, A Legal Regime for the Mining of Helium-3 on the Moon: U.S. Policy Options, 33 Fordham Int'l L. J. 243 (2010).
  17. Arthur W. Blaser, The Common Heritage in Its Infinite Variety: Space Law and the Moon in the 1990s, 5 J. L. & Tech. 79 (1990).
  18. P. J. Blount & Christian J. Robison, One Small Step: The Impact of the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015 on the Exploitation of Resources in Outer Space, 18 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 160 (2016).
  19. Andrew R. Brehm, Private Property in Outer Space: Establishing A Foundation for Future Exploration, 33 Wis. Int'l L.J. 353 (2015).
  20. Christian Brunner & Alexander Soucek eds., Outer Space in Society, Politics and Law (Springer, 2011).
  21. Carol R. Buxton, Property in Outer Space: The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle vs. the "First in Time, First in Right" Rule of Property Law, 69 J. Air L. & Com. 689 (2004).
  22. Carl Q. Christol, The Common Heritage of Mankind Provision in the 1979 Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 14 Int'l Law. 429 (1980).
  23. Sarah Coffey, Establishing a Legal Framework for Property Rights to Natural Resources in Outer Space, 41 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 119 (2009).
  24. Kevin V. Cook, The Discovery of Lunar Water: An Opportunity to Develop A Workable Moon Treaty, 11 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 647 (1999).
  25. Nikhil D. Cooper, Circumventing Non-Appropriation: Law and Development of United States Space Commerce, 36 Hastings Const. L. Q. 457 (2009).
  26. Scott F. Cooper, The 1979 Agreement Governing the Activities on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies: Does it Create a Moratorium on the Commercial Exploitation of the Moon's Natural Resources?, 5 J. L. & Tech. 63 (1990).
  27. Juan Davalos, International Standards in Regulating Space Travel: Clarifying Ambiguities in the Commercial Era of Outer Space, 30 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 597 (2016).
  28. Philip De Man, Exclusive Use in an Inclusive Environment: The Meaning of the Non-Appropriation Principle for Space Resource Exploitation (Springer, 2016).
  29. Paul G. Dembling & Daniel M. Arons, The Evolution of the Outer Space Treaty, 33 J. Air L. & Com. 419 (1967).
  30. I. H. Ph. Diederiks-Verschoor, Implications of Commercial Activities in Outer Space, Especially for the Developing Countries, 17 J. Space L. 115 (1989).
  31. Stephen DiMaria, Starships and Enterprise: Private Spaceflight Companies' Property Rights and the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, 90 St. John's L. Rev. 415 (2016).
  32. Michael Dodge, The U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015: Moving U.S. Space Activities Forward, 29 No. 3 Air & Space Law. 4 (2016).
  33. Frans von der Dunk & Fabio Tronchetti eds., Handbook of Space Law (Edward Elgar, 2015).
  34. Matthew Feinman, Mining the Final Frontier: Keeping Earth's Asteroid Mining Ventures from Becoming the Next Gold Rush, 14 Pitt. J. Tech. L. & Pol'y 202 (2014).
  35. Craig Foster, Excuse Me, You're Mining My Asteroid: Space Property Rights and the U.S. Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015, 2016 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 407 (2016).
  36. Jennifer Frakes, The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle and the Deep Seabed, Outer Space, and Antarctica: Will Developed and Developing Nations Reach A Compromise?, 21 Wis. Int'l L.J. 409 (2003).
  37. Lynn M. Fountain, Creating Momentum in Space: Ending the Paralysis Produced by the "Common Heritage of Mankind" Doctrine, 35 Conn. L. Rev. 1753 (2003).
  38. Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, Space Law: Its Cold War Origins and Challenges in the Era of Globalization, 37 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1041 (2004).
  39. Blake Gilson, Defending Your Client's Property Rights in Space: A Practical Guide for the Lunar Litigator, 80 Fordham L. Rev. 1367 (2011).
  40. David Goldman, Settlement and Sovereignty on Outer Space, 22 U. W. Ont. L. Rev 155 (1984).
  41. Stephen Gorove, Interpreting Article II of the Outer Space Treaty, 37 Fordham L. Rev. 349 (1969).
  42. Robbie Gramer, Striking Gold in Space, 31 Wash. Law. 18 (2016).
  43. Brandon C. Gruner, A New Hope For International Space Law: Incorporating Nineteenth Century First Possession Principles into the 1967 Space Treaty for the Colonization of Outer Space in the Twenty-First Century, 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 299 (2004).
  44. Ian Hedges, How the Rest Was Won: Creating A Universally Beneficial Legal Regime for Space-Based Natural Resource Utilization, 40 Vt. L. Rev. 365 (2015).
  45. Barbara Ellen Heim, Exploring the Last Frontiers for Mineral Resources: A Comparison of International Law Regarding the Deep Seabed, Outer Space, and Antarctica, 23 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 819 (1990).
  46. Henry R. Hertzfeld & Frans G. von der Dunk, Bringing Space Law into the Commercial World: Property Rights Without Sovereignty, 6 Chi. J. Int'l L. 81 (2005).
  47. Stephan Hobe, Bernhard Schmidt-Tedd & Kai-Uwe Schrogl eds., Cologne Commentary on Space Law, Vol. I- Outer Space Treaty (Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2009).
  48. Stephan Hobe, Bernhard Schmidt-Tedd & Kai-Uwe Schrogl eds., Cologne Commentary on Space Law, Vol. II- Rescue Agreement, Liability Convention, Registration Convention, Moon Agreement (Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2013).
  49. Brian M. Hoffstadt, Moving the Heavens: Lunar Mining and the "Common Heritage of Mankind" in the Moon Treaty, 42 ULCA L. Rev. 575 (1994).
  50. J. H. Huebert & Walter Block, Space Environmentalism, Property Rights, and the Law, 37 U. Mem. L. Rev. 281 (2007).
  51. Eric Husby, Sovereignty and Property Rights in Outer Space, 3 J. Int'l L. & Prac. 359 (1994).
  52. Kyle A. Jacobsen, From Interstate to Interstellar Commerce: Incorporating the Private Sector into International Aerospace Law, 87 Temp. L. Rev. 159 (2014).
  53. Ram S. Jakhu & Paul Stephen Dempsey eds., Routledge Handbook of Space Law (Routledge, 2017).
  54. Ram S. Jakhu et al., Space Mining and Its Regulation (Springer, 2016).
  55. Michael Jensen, Asteroidae Naturae: What It Takes to Capture an Asteroid, 45 Sw. L. Rev. 757 (2016).
  56. Christopher C. Joyner, Legal Implications of the Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind, 35 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 190 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/35.1.190
  57. Fred Kosmo, The Commercialization of Space: A Regulatory Scheme that Promotes Commercial Ventures and International Responsibility, 61 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1055 (1988).
  58. Benjamin David Landry, A Tragedy of the Anticommons: The Economic Inefficiencies of Space Law, 38 Brook. J. Int'l L. 523 (2013).
  59. Ricky J. Lee, Law and Regulation of Commercial Mining of Minerals in Outer Space (Springer, 2012).
  60. Andrew Lintner, Extraterrestrial Extraction: The International Implications of the Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015, 40-SUM Fletcher F. World Aff. 139 (2016).
  61. Francis Lyall & Paul B. Larsen, Space Law: A Treatise (Routledge, 2016).
  62. Kevin MacWhorter, Sustainable Mining: Incentivizing Asteroid Mining in the Name of Environmentalism, 40 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 645 (2016).
  63. Ross Meyers, The Doctrine of Appropriation and Asteroid Mining: Incentivizing the Private Exploration and Development of Outer Space, 17 Or. Rev. Int'l L. 183 (2015).
  64. Zach Meyer, Private Commercialization of Space in an International Regime: A Proposal for A Space District, 30 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 241 (2010).
  65. Alison Morris, Intergalactic Property Law: A New Regime for A New Age, 19 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 1085 (2017).
  66. Austin C. Murnane, The Prospector's Guide to the Galaxy, 37 Fordham Int'l L.J. 235 (2013).
  67. John Myers, Extraterrestrial Property Rights: Utilizing the Resources of the Final Frontier, 18 San Diego Int'l L.J. 77 (2016).
  68. Timothy G. Nelson, Mining Outer Space: Who owns the Asteroids?, N.Y. L.J., Jul. 29, 2015.
  69. Declan J. O'Donnell & Nathan C. Goldman, Revisiting the Outer Space Treaty: A Re-Examination of the Sovereignty - Jurisdiction Compromise, in The Future Applications of the Outer Space Treaty, 40 Proc. on L. Outer Space 316 (1997).
  70. Ryan Hugh O'Donnell, Staking A Claim in the Twenty-First Century: Real Property Rights on Extra-Terrestrial Bodies, 32 U. Dayton L. Rev. 461 (2007).
  71. Gbenga Oduntan, Sovereignty and Jurisdiction in Airspace and Outer Space: Legal Criteria for Spatial Delimitation (Routledge, 2011).
  72. Edwin W. Paxson, Sharing the Benefits of Outer Space Exploration: Space Law and Economic Development, 14 Mich. J. Int'l L. 487 (1993).
  73. Joseph N. Pelton, The New Gold Rush: The Riches of Space Beckon! (Springer, 2016).
  74. Virgiliu Pop, Who Owns the Moon? : Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership (Springer, 2009).
  75. Elliot Reaven, The United States Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act: The Creation of Private Space Property Rights and the Omission of the Right to Freedom from Harmful Interference, 94 Wash. U.L. Rev. 233 (2016).
  76. Ezra J. Reinstein, Owning Outer Space, 20 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 59 (1999).
  77. Samuel Roth, Developing A Law of Asteroids: Constants, Variables, and Alternatives, 54 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 827 (2016).
  78. Lawrence L. Risley, An Examination of the Need to Amend Space Law to Protect the Private Explorer in Outer Space, 26 W. St. U. L. Rev. 47 (1999).
  79. Rosanna Sattler, Transporting a Legal System for Property Rights: From the Earth to the Stars, 6 Chi. J. Int'l L. 23 (2005).
  80. Patricia Margaret Sterns & Leslie I. Tennen eds., Private Law, Public Law, Metalaw and Public Policy in Space (Springer, 2016).
  81. Mark J. Sundahl, Regulating Non-Traditional Space Activities in the United States in the Wake of the Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, 42 Air & Space L. 29 (2017).
  82. Howard J. Taubenfeld, Regime for Outer Space, 56 Nw. U. L. Rev. 129 (1961).
  83. Leslie I. Tennen, Enterprise Rights and the Legal Regime for Exploitation of Outer Space Resources, 47 U. Pac. L. Rev 281 (2016).
  84. H. L. van Traa-Engelman, Commercial Utilization of Outer Space: Law and Practice (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993).
  85. Timothy Justin Trapp, Taking Up Space by Any Other Means: Coming to Terms with the Nonappropriation Article of the Outer Space Treaty, 2013 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1681 (2013).
  86. Susan J. Trepczynski, New Space Activities Expose A Potential Regulatory Vacuum, 43 No. 3 The Reporter 12 (2016).
  87. Fabio Tronchetti, Fundamentals of Space Law and Policy (Springer, 2013).
  88. Fabio Tronchetti, Title IV-Space Resource Exploration and Utilization of the US Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act: A Legal and Political Assessment, 41 Air & Space L. 143 (2016).
  89. Fabio Tronchetti, The Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act: A Move Forward or a Step Back?, 34 Space Pol'y 6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2015.08.001
  90. Fabio Tronchetti, Private Property Rights on Asteroid Resources: Assessing the Legality of the ASTEROIDS Act, 30 Space Pol'y 193 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.07.005
  91. Fabio Tronchetti, The Non-Appropriation Principle as a Structural Norm of International Law: A New Way of Interpreting Article II of the Outer Space Treaty, 33 Air & Space L. 277 (2008).
  92. Alan Wasser & Douglas Jobes, Space Settlements, Property Rights, and International Law: Could a Lunar Settlement Claim the Lunar Real Estate It Needs to Survive, 73 J. Air L. & Com. 37 (2008).
  93. Edythe E. Weeks, Outer Space Development, International Relations and Space Law: A Method for Elucidating Seeds (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012).
  94. Wayne N. White, Jr., Interpreting Article II of the Outer Space Treaty, in Space Treaties, Law and Policies and Telecommunication Issues, 46 Proc. on L. Outer Space 171 (2003).
  95. James R. Wilson, Regulation of the Outer Space Environment Through International Accord: The 1979 Moon Treaty, 2 Fordham Envtl. L. Rep. 173 (1991).
  96. Jeremy L. Zell, Putting A Mine on the Moon: Creating an International Authority to Regulate Mining Rights in Outer Space, 15 Minn. J. Int'l L. 489 (2006).