Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research (국제물리치료학회지)

International Academy of Physical Therapy Research (국제물리치료연구학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Kinetics Analysis during Stance Phase of Fore Foot Contact versus Rear Foot Contact in Running

  • Received : 2016.12.11
  • Accepted : 2017.02.10
  • Published : 2017.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the difference of the ankle joint movements during landing. Seven adult males voluntarily participated in the study and the average foot size of the subjects was 269.8 mm. Image analysis equipment and the ground reaction force plate (landing type) was used to measure th kinetic variables. As a result of this study, it was confirmed that the vertical ground reaction force peak point appeared once in the barefoot with forefoot, while two peak points appeared in the barefoot and functional shoe foot with rear foot landing. About ankle angle, fore foot landing ankle angle, the average with bare foot landing was $-10.302^{\circ}$ and the average with functional shoe foot landing was $-2.919^{\circ}$. Also about rear foot landing, ankle angle was $11.648^{\circ}$ with bare foot landing and $15.994^{\circ}$ with functional shoe landing. The fore foot landing, ankle joint force analysis produced 1423.966N with barefoot and 1493.264N with functional shoes. But, the rear foot landing, ankle joint force analysis produced 1680.154N with barefoot and 1657.286N with functional shoes. This study suggest that the angle of ankle depends on the landing type and bare foot running/functionalized shod running, and ankle joint forces also depends on landing type.

Keywords

References

  1. Nigg BM. Some comments for runners. In Biomechanics of Running Shoes. Human Kinematics Publishers. 1986. 162-5.
  2. Romkes J, Rudmann C, Reinald BR. Change in gait and EMG walking with the masai Barefoot Technique. Clin Biomech. 2005; 21(1): 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.003
  3. Nigg B, Hintzen S, Ferber R. Effect of an unstable shoe construction on lower extremity gait characteristics. Clin Biomech. 2006; 21(1): 82-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.013
  4. Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D'Andrea S, Davis IS, Mang'eni RO, Pitsiladis Y. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature. 2010; 463(7280): 531-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08723
  5. Clement DB, Taunton JE, Smart GW, McNicol KL. A survey of overuse running injuries. Physician Sports Med.1981; 9(5): 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.1981.11711077
  6. Smart GW, Taunton JE, Clement DB. Achilles tendon disorders in runners: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980; 12(4): 231-43.
  7. Tiberio D. The effect of excessive subtalar joint pronation on patellofemoral mechanics: a theoretical model. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1987; 9(4): 160-5. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1987.9.4.160
  8. Viitasalo JT, Kvist M. Some biomechanical aspects of the foot and ankle in athletes with and without shin splints. Am J Sports Med. 1983; 11(3): 125-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658301100304
  9. Nordin M, Frankle VH. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system(2ed). Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia. 2001.
  10. Park SJ, Chae HS. Analysis on foot measuremants of Elderly Women for Ergonomic shoes design. J Kor Soc Cloth Industry. 2008; 10(1): 83-91.
  11. Kouchi M. Analysis of foot shape variation based on the medial axis of foot outline. Ergonomics. 1995; 38(9): 1911-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925239
  12. Jaegers SM, Arendzen JH, de Jongh HJ. Prosthetic gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees: a kinematic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76(8): 736-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80528-1
  13. Kaneko M, Matsumoto M, Ito A, Fuchimoto T. Optimum step frequency in constant speed running. In B. Jonson, 1987, 803-7.
  14. Munro CF, Miller DI, Fuglevand AJ. Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination. J Biomech. 1987; 20(2): 147-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(87)90306-X
  15. Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA. Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech. 1980; 13(5): 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90033-0
  16. Squadrone R, Gallozzi C. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009; 49(1): 6-13.
  17. Simon SR, Radin EL, Paul IL, Rose RM. The response of joints to impact loading. II. In vivo behavior of subchondral bone. J Biomech. 1972; 5(3): 267-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(72)90042-5