DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Distribution Characteristics of Exotic Turtles in Korean Wild - Based on Gangwon-do and Gyeongsangnam-do -

국내 야생에서 발견되는 외래거북류의 분포 특성 - 강원도와 경상남도 지역을 중심으로 -

  • Koo, Kyo Soung (Department of Biology, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kwon, Sera (Department of Biology, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Do, Min Seock (Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Suhwan (National Environment Research)
  • Received : 2017.09.01
  • Accepted : 2017.09.22
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

Development of transportation is rapidly reducing the barriers between countries, but this is causing the easier migration of species than the past. Typically, exotic species are imported for the purpose of food, leather, and pets. However, it has been introduced into the wild through artificially or naturally paths, and recently they are become a main cause of ecosystem disturbance. In this study, we investigated exotic turtle species introduced into the wild and analyzed their distribution characteristics. As a result of filed surveys, totally 4 genus 8 species 62 individuals of exotic turtles were found from 126 reservoirs in Gangwon-do and Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea. In particular, Trachemys scripta elegans showed relatively high frequency than other turtle species and the natural reproduction of T. s. elegans was confirmed in some areas. On the other hand, the frequency of discovery of exotic turtles except T. s. elegans was relatively low, and the range of the areas was limited. Especially, exotic turtles except T. s. elegans were mainly found in public places such as reservoirs in the park. As a result of analyzing the distribution characteristics of exotic turtles using geographic information system, the turtles' distribution showed a high correlation with the artificial factor such as "urban". In this study, we identified the distribution characteristics of exotic turtles in the Korean wild, and these results will be important data for understanding status the and establishing effective management methods for exotic species.

교통수단의 발달은 국가 간의 장벽을 빠르게 낮추고 있지만 이는 과거보다 쉬운 생물종 이동의 원인으로 작용하고 있다. 특히 수 많은 종류의 외래생물들이 식량과 가죽, 애완 등의 목적으로 수입되고 있으며, 인위적 혹은 자연적으로 야생에 유입되어 생태계 교란의 주범이 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 대표적인 외래생물종인 붉은귀거북을 비롯한 외래거북을 대상으로 국내 생태계로의 유입현황을 파악하고, 이들의 분포 특성을 분석하고자 하였다. 강원도와 경상남도 지역에 위치한 총 126개의 저수지를 조사한 결과, 총 4속 8종 62개체의 외래거북들이 발견되었다. 그중 붉은귀거북의 발견 빈도가 상대적으로 높았으며, 일부 지역에서는 붉은귀거북의 자연 번식도 이루어지고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 반면, 붉은귀거북을 제외한 다른 외래거북들의 발견 빈도는 비교적 낮았으며, 발견되는 지역의 범위는 제한적이었다. 특히 외래거북들은 공원 내 저수지와 같은 일반인의 접근이 비교적 높은 곳에서 주로 발견되었다. 지리정보시스템을 이용한 외래거북의 분포 특성을 분석한 결과, 외래거북의 발견은 시가지라는 인위적인 요소와 높은 연관성을 보였다. 이러한 연구 결과는 생태계에 유입되어 있는 외래거북류의 현황 파악과 동시에 이들을 효과적으로 관리하기 위한 방안을 수립의 중요한 근거가 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. An, S.Q., B.H. Gu, C.F. Zhou, Z.S. Wang, Z.F. Deng, Y.B. Zhi, H.L. Li, L. Chen, D.H. Yu and Y.H. Liu. 2007. Spartina invasion in China: implications for invasive species management and future research. Weed Research 47: 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00559.x
  2. Barton, D.P. 1997. Introduced animals and their parasites: The cane toad, Bufo marinus, in Australia. Austral Ecology 22: 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1997.tb00677.x
  3. Beard, K.H. 2007. Diet of the invasive frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui, in Hawaii. Copeia 2007: 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2007)7[281:DOTIFE]2.0.CO;2
  4. Beard, K.H. and E.M. O’Neill. 2005. Infection of an invasive frog Eleutherodactylus coqui by the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Hawaii. Biological Conservation 126: 591-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.004
  5. Boyer, D.R. 1965. Ecology of the basking habit in turtles. Ecology 46: 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935262
  6. Bryan, E.H, Jr. 1932. Frogs in Hawaii. Mid-Pacific Magazine 43: 61-64.
  7. Buckley, Y.M., M. Rees, Q. Paynter and M. Lonsdale. 2004. Modelling integrated weed management of an invasive shrub in tropical Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 547-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00909.x
  8. Crossland, M.R., G.P. Brown, M. Anstis, C.M. Shilton and R. Shine. 2008. Mass mortality of native anuran tadpoles in tropical Australia due to the invasive cane toad (Bufo marinus). Biological Conservation 141: 2387-2394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.005
  9. Gao, Y., Z. Lei, Y. Abe and S.R. Reitz. 2011. Species displacements are common to two invasive species of leafminer fly in China, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Economic Entomology 104: 1771-1773. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC11206
  10. GISD, Global Invasive Species Database. 2009. Trachemys scripta elegans. GISD. Invasive Species Specialist Group.
  11. Hauser, C.E. and M.A. McCarthy. 2009. Streamlining ‘search and destroy’: cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management. Ecology Letters 12: 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01323.x
  12. Hill, J.K., H.M. Griffiths and C.D. Thomas. 2010. Climate change and evolutionary adaptations at species’ range margins. Annual Review of Entomology 56: 143-159.
  13. Hoskin, C.J. 2011. The invasion and potential impact of the Asian House Gecko (Hemidactylus frenatus) in Australia. Austral Ecology 36: 240-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02143.x
  14. Huxel, G.R. 1999. Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species: effects of hybridization. Biological Conservation 89: 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00153-0
  15. Jang, H.J. and J.H. Suh. 2010. Distribution of amphibian species in South Korea. Korean Journal of Herpetology 2: 45-51. (in Korean with English abstract)
  16. Jung, J.H. 2014. Activity factors and diet analysis of the redeared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta) in Ansan Reed Wetland Park. Master's thesis. Seoul National University. 89pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  17. Kil, J. and C.G. Kim. 2014. Overview of preventive measures against invasive alien species in Korea and suggestions for their improvement. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 47: 239-246. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2014.47.4.239
  18. Kim, G.R. and H.S. Oh. 2017. Biological characteristics and current status of nutria (Myocastor coypus) Introduced in Jeju Island. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 26: 1-10. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2017.26.1.1
  19. Kim, I.T., J.R. Park and W.J. Kim. 2013. Indirect evaluation of aquatic animal diversity in Ilsan Lake through the analysis of the growing condition and stomach contents of largemouth Bass, Micropterus salmoides. Journal of Korean Society of Environmenal Engineer 35: 953-959. https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2013.35.12.953
  20. Kim, S.H., H.H.M. Lee, D.E. Kim, D.H. Lee, I.C. Hwang, C.W. Lee, H.M. Kim, H.J. Lee, M.J. Kim, D.K. Kim, H.Y. Song, E.J. Park and J.M. Kim. 2014. Information on Alien Species on Korea. National Institute of Ecology 175pp. (in Korean)
  21. Lee, D.H., C.W. Lee and J. Kil. 2013. A Study on plant diet resource of nutria (Myocastor coypus) Habitat in Nakdongriver. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 22: 491-511. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2013.22.5.491
  22. Lee, D.H., Y.C. Kim, M.H. Chang, S. Kim, D. Kim and J. Kil. 2016. Current status and management of alien turtles in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25: 319-332. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.5.319
  23. Lee, H.J. 2010. Distribution and characteristics of Reeve's Turtle (Chinemys reevesii) populations in Jeolla-do and Gyeongsangnam-do. Master's thesis. Kangwon National University 48pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  24. Lovell, S.J., S.F. Stone and L. Fernandez. 2006. The economic impacts of aquatic invasive species: a review of the literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35: 195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500010157
  25. Lowe, S., M. Browne, S. Boudjelas and M. De Poorter. 2000. 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database (Vol. 12). Auckland: Invasive Species Specialist Group.
  26. Ministry of Environment. 2006. Establishment and management of monitoring system for ecosystem disturbance species. 212pp. (in Korean)
  27. Mito, T. and T. Uesugi. 2004. Invasive alien species in Japan: the status quo and the new regulation for prevention of their adverse effects. Global Environmental Research 8: 171-193.
  28. Miyawaki, S. and I. Washitani. 2004. Invasive alien plant species in riparian areas of Japan: the contribution of agricultural weeds, revegetation species and aquacultural species. Global Environmental Research 8: 89-101.
  29. Mun, S., K.H. Nam, C.G. Kim, Y.J. Chun, H.W. Lee, J.H. Kil and J.C. Lee. 2013. Suggestions for the improvement of the invasive alien species management in Korea-a comparative analysis of the legal framework for invasive alien species between Japan and Korea. Environmental Policy 6: 35-54. (in Korean with English abstract)
  30. National Institute of Ecology. 2014. Ecological studies of alien species (I). 101pp. (in Korean)
  31. National Institute of Ecology. 2015. Nationwide survey of nonnative species in Korea (I). 342pp. (in Korean)
  32. Oh, H.S. and C.E. Hong. 2007. Current conditions of habitat for Rana catesbeiana and Trachemys scripta elegans imported to Jeju-do, including proposed management plans. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 21: 311-317. (in Korean with English abstract)
  33. Oliver, J.A. and C.E. Shaw. 1953. The amphibians and reptiles of the Hawaiian Islands. Zoologica 38: 65-95.
  34. Perez-Santigosa, N., M. Florencio, J. Hidalgo-Vila and C. Diaz- Paniagua. 2011. Does the exotic turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans, compete for food with coexisting native turtles?. Amphibia-Reptilia 32: 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1163/017353710X552795
  35. Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga and D. Morrison. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alieninvasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002
  36. Rollins, L.A., A.P. Woolnough, A.N. Wilton, R.O.N. Sinclair and W.B. Sherwin. 2009. Invasive species can't cover their tracks: using microsatellites to assist management of starling (Sturnus vulgaris) populations in Western Australia. Molecular Ecology 18: 1560-1573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04132.x
  37. Shine, R. 2010. The ecological impact of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85: 253-291. https://doi.org/10.1086/655116
  38. Song, J.Y. 2007. Current status and distribution of reptiles in the Republic of Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 25: 124-138. (in Korean with English abstract)
  39. The Reptile Database. 2017. Available from: http://www.reptiledatabase. org/db-info/taxa.html#C8. [Cited 27 Mar 2017].
  40. van Dijk, P.P., J. Harding and G.A. Hammerson. 2011. Trachemys scripta (errata version published in 2016). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T22028A97429935.
  41. Warwick, C., C. Steedman and T. Holford. 1990. Ecological implications of the Red-eared Turtle trade. Texas Journal of Science 42: 419-422.
  42. Weber, E., S.G. Sun and B. Li. 2008. Invasive alien plants in China: diversity and ecological insights. Biological Invasions 10: 1411-1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9216-3
  43. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall. London. 244pp.
  44. Wittenberg, R. and M.J. Cock. 2001. Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices. CABI.
  45. Yan, X., L. Zhenyu, W.P. Gregg and L. Dianmo. 2001. Invasive species in China - an overview. Biodiversity & Conservation 10: 1317-1341. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016695609745