DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anesthetic Effect of Different Ratio of Ketamine and Propofol in Dogs

  • Lee, Mokhyeon (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Sohee (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Moon, Chawnghwan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Jiyoung (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Haebeom (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seong Mok (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2017.07.11
  • Accepted : 2017.08.11
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

Use of ketamine and propofol combination (so-called Ketofol) anesthesiain a fixed ratio (1:1 mg/ml) was reported in dogs. The use of ketofol reduced cardiovascular suppression, but respiratory-related side effects was not significantly different from propofol alone. In this study, we evaluated the quality of ketofol anesthesia and changes in cardiopulmonary function according to the ratio of ketamine to propofol. The experimental groups were divided into three groups: propofol alone (P group), 3:7 ketofol group (PK1 group) and 1:1 ketofol group (PK2). For each group, the dose of 0.8 ml/kgwas administered intravenously at a constant rate until the tracheal intubation was possible and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane for 120 minutes after induction of anesthesia. There was no significant difference in the anesthetic quality among three groups. Also, there was no difference in respiratory rate, tidal volume, end-tidal carbondioxide, and oxygen saturation. In group P, heart rate was not changed significantly during anesthesia, but arterial blood pressure decreased, while heart rate and arterial blood pressure increased significantly in group PK2. In the PK1 group, heart rate and arterial blood pressure during anesthesia remained similar to pre-anesthetic values. In conclusion, ketofol might be used as induction agent, and 3:7 ratioof ketofol showed more safe and effective anesthetic effect in dogs. Additionally, 1:1 ketofol may be used in patients with severe bradycardia orhypotension with close monitoring during anesthesia.

Keywords

References

  1. Akin A, Esmaoglu A, Tosun Z, Gulcu N, Aydog H, Boyaci A. Comparison of propofol with propofol-ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing auditory brainstem response testing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 69: 1541-1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.04.011
  2. Andolfatto G, Abu-Laban RB, Zed PJ, Staniforth SM, Stackhouse S, Moadebi S, Willman E. Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized double-blind trial. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 59: 504-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.01.017
  3. Arora S. Combining ketamine and propofol ("ketofol") for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a review. West J Emerg Med 2008; 9: 20-23.
  4. Badrinath S, Avramov MN, Shadrick M, Witt TR, Ivankovich AD. The use of a ketamine-propofol combination during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 858-862. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-200004000-00016
  5. Bosiack AP, Mann FA, Dodam JR, Wagner-Mann CC, Branson KR. Comparison of ultrasonic Doppler flow monitor, oscillometric, and direct arterial blood pressure measurements in ill dogs. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2010; 20: 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-4431.2010.00520.x
  6. Covey-Crump GL, Murison PJ. Fentanyl or midazolam for co-induction of anaesthesia with propofol in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008; 35: 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00408.x
  7. Donnelly RF, Willman EV, Andolfatto G. Stability of ketaminepropofol mixtures for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Can J Hosp Pharm 2008; 61: 426-430.
  8. Frizelle HP, Duranteau J, Samii K. A comparison of propofol with a propofol-ketamine combination for sedation during spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1318-1322. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199706000-00026
  9. Haskins SC, Farver TB, Patz JD. Ketamine in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 1855-1860.
  10. Hui TW, Short TG, Hong W, Suen T, Gin T, Plummer J. Additive interactions between propofol and ketamine when used for anesthesia induction in female patients. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 641-648. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199503000-00005
  11. Kennedy MJ, Smith LJ. A comparison of cardiopulmonary function, recovery quality, and total dosages required for induction and total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus a propofol-ketamine combination in healthy Beagle dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015; 42: 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12218
  12. Kogan A, Efrat R, Katz J, Vidne BA. Propofol-ketamine mixture for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17: 691-693. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2003.09.008
  13. Lerche P, Nolan AM, Reid J. Comparative study of propofol or propofol and ketamine for the induction of anaesthesia in dogs. Vet Rec 2000; 146: 571-574. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.146.20.571
  14. Mair AR, Pawson P, Courcier E, Flaherty D. A comparison of the effects of two different doses of ketamine used for coinduction of anaesthesia with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2009; 36: 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00500.x
  15. Maney JK, Shepard MK, Braun C, Cremer J, Hofmeister EH. A comparison of cardiopulmonary and anesthetic effects of an induction dose of alfaxalone or propofol in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2013; 40: 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12006
  16. Martinez-Taboada F, Leece EA. Comparison of propofol with ketofol, a propofol-ketamine admixture, for induction of anaesthesia in healthy dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014; 41: 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12171
  17. Muir WWIII, Gadawski JE. Respiratory depression and apnea induced by propofol in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1998; 59: 157-161.
  18. Pagel PS, Warltier DC. Negative inotropic effects of propofol as evaluated by the regional preload recruitable stroke work relationship in chronically instrumented dogs. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199301000-00015
  19. Phillips W, Anderson A, Rosengreen M, Johnson J, Halpin J. Propofol versus propofol/ketamine for brief painful procedures in the emergency department: clinical and bispectral index scale comparison. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2010; 24: 349-355. https://doi.org/10.3109/15360288.2010.506503
  20. Seliskar A, Nemec A, Roskar T, Butinar J. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol or propofol/ketamine in spontaneously breathing dogs premedicated with medetomidine. Vet Rec 2007; 160: 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.160.3.85
  21. Smith JA, Gaynor JS, Bednarski RM, Muir WW. Adverse effects of administration of propofol with various preanesthetic regimens in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 202: 1111-1115.
  22. Thomas MC, Jennett-Reznek AM, Patanwala AE. Combination of ketamine and propofol versus either agent alone for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011; 68: 2248-2256. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp110136
  23. Watkins SB, Hall LW, Clarke KW. Propofol as an intravenous anaesthetic agent in dogs. Vet Rec 1987; 120: 326-329. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.120.14.326
  24. Willman EV, Andolfatto G. A prospective evaluation of "ketofol" (ketamine/propofol combination) for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49: 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.002
  25. Wong DH, Jenkins LC. An experimental study of the mechanism of action of ketamine on the central nervous system. Can Anaesth Soc J 1974; 21: 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03004579
  26. Zonca A, Ravasio G, Gallo M, Montesissa C, Carli S, Villa R, Cagnardi P. Pharmacokinetics of ketamine and propofol combination administered as ketofol via continuous infusion in cats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35: 580-587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2012.01377.x