Korean Journal of Plant Resources (한국자원식물학회지)

The Plant Resources Society of Korea (한국자원식물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Application of Species Richness Estimators and Species Accumulation Curves to Traditional Ethnobotanical Knowledges in South Korea

남한지역 전통민속식물지식 자료를 활용한 종누적곡선 분석 및 종풍부도 추정 연구

  • Park, Yuchul (Division of Forest Biodiversity and Herbarium, Korea National Arboretum) ;
  • Chang, Kae Sun (Division of Forest Biodiversity and Herbarium, Korea National Arboretum) ;
  • Kim, Hui (Department of Medicinal Plants Resources & Institute of Oriental Medicine, Mokpo National University)
  • 박유철 (국립수목원 산림생물조사과 및 산림생물표본관) ;
  • 장계선 (국립수목원 산림생물조사과 및 산림생물표본관) ;
  • 김휘 (목포대학교 자연과학대학 한약자원학과 및 한방산업연구소)
  • Received : 2017.07.07
  • Accepted : 2017.09.18
  • Published : 2017.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Under circumstances of rapid disappearing of traditional ethnobotanical knowledge, traditional ethnobotanical knowledge surveys are the major step in documenting useful species with a conservation priority. In the ethnobotanical research, the relevance to the survey intensity, ethnobotanical information and plant species richness is the most important research theme. We made up TEK database in south Korea using metadata which had been published by the Korea National Arboretum. We calculated species richness using species richness estimator like ACE, Chao1, Chao2, ICE, Jack 1, Jack 2, and Bootstrap. Species accumulation curves showed each province sampling efforts appeared to be wide range of variance so that Gangwon province need more sampling efforts, and Chungnam province approached a horizontal asymptote earlier. We found heterogeneous patterns in the rarefaction curves of TEK species between gender for each categories of use (medicinal, food and handicrafts). Comparing with regional floral diversities, it was predicted that more diverse species would be found in some provinces by carrying out additional survey.

전통민속식물지식이 빠르게 사라져 가는 상황에서 전통식물지식에 대한 기초조사를 통한 기록이 매우 중요한 과제가 되었다. 민속식물학 조사에서 조사강도와 민속식물정보, 식물종 정보의 증가에 관련성은 가장 중요한 과제이다. 본 연구에서는 국립수목원에서 발간된 자료를 이용하여 한반도 민속식물에 대한 메타 데이터를 DB화하여 분석하였다. 전통민속식물지식의 종풍부도에 추정은 ACE, Chao1, Chao 2, ICE, Jack 1, Jack 2, Bootstrap 등의 추정식을 이용하여 제시하였다. 종누적곡선 분석에서 지역별 종누적이 다른 양상을 보여 강원도의 누적곡선은 상대적 샘플링 노력이 더 필요하며충남 지역의 경우 조사 강도에 비해 일찍 수평선에 점근하는 특성을 보여 이지역의 조사 강도가 실제 정보량의 증가에 비해 높았다. 식용, 약용, 공예용 등의 종풍부도는 남녀간의 지식이 분포가 차이가 있음을 확인하였다. 주변환경의 식물상과 비교분석을 통해 일부 지역의 경우 민속식물조사가 상대적으로 조사량이 부족하고 추가 조사시 더 다양한 종이 발굴 될 것으로 예상된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Begossi, A. 1996. Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany: diversity indices. Econ. Bot. 50:280-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907333
  2. Benz, B., J.E. Cevallos, F.M. Santana, J.A. Rosales and S.M. Graf. 2000. Losing knowledge about plant use in the Sierra de Manantlan Biosphere Reserve Mexico. Econ. Bot. 54:183-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907821
  3. Bussmann, R.W., N.Y.P. Zambrana, S. Sikharulidze, Z. Kikvidze, D. Kikodze, D. Tchelidze and R.E. Hart. 2016. A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 12:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2
  4. Chiarucci, A., N.J. Enright, G.L.W. Perry, B.P. Miller and B.B. Lamont. 2003. Performance of non-parametric species richness estimators in a high diversity plant community. Divers. Distrib. 9:283-295. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00027.x
  5. Chung, J.M., H.J. Kim, G.W. Park, H.R. Jeong, K. Choi and C.H. Shin. 2016. Ethnobotanical study on the traditional knowledge of vascular plant resources in South Korea. Korean J. Plant Res. 29:62-89 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2016.29.1.062
  6. Colwell, R.K. 2007. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.0. User's Guide and Application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
  7. Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell. 2011. Estimating species richness. Biological diversity: frontiers iin measurement and assessment. In Magurran A.E. and B.J. McGill (eds.), Biological Diversity Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment. Oxford University Press, NY (USA). pp. 39-54.
  8. Hanazaki, N., J.Y. Tamashiro, H.F. Leitao-Filho and A. Begossi. 2000. Diversity of plant uses in two Caicara communities from the Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil. Biodivers. Conserv. 9:597-615. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008920301824
  9. Jeong, H.R. 2014. Ethnobotanical study on the traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in Korea. Department of Forest Resources, Ph.D. Thesis, Gyeongsang Nat'l Univ., Korea. pp. 1-149 (in Korean).
  10. Korea National Arboretum. 2009a. Folk Plants in Korean Peninsula III. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Korea (in Korean).
  11. Korea National Arboretum. 2009b. Folk Plants in Korean Peninsula IV. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Korea (in Korean).
  12. Korea National Arboretum. 2010a. Folk Plants in Korean Peninsula V. Korea National Arboretum. Pocheon, Korea (in Korean).
  13. Korea National Arboretum. 2010b. Folk Plants in Korean Peninsula VI. Korea National Arboretum. Pocheon, Korea (in Korean).
  14. Korea National Arboretum. 2011a. Folk Plants in Korean Peninsula VII. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Korea (in Korean).
  15. Korea National Arboretum. 2011b. Folk Plants in Korean Peninsula VII. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Korea (in Korean).
  16. Korea National Arboretum. 2012. Folk Plants in Korean Peninsula IV. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Korea (in Korean).
  17. Park, Y.C. 2017. Quantitative ethnobotany in South Korea. - Metadata analysis of traditional botanical knowledge & conservation Implication -. Department of Medicinal Plants Resources, Master Thesis, Mokpo National Univ., Korea. pp. 1-58 (in Korean).
  18. Quinlan, M. and R. Quinlan. 2007. Modernization and medicinal plant knowledge in a Caribbean horticultural village. Med. Anthropol. Q. 21:169-192. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2007.21.2.169
  19. Soberón, J. and J. Llorente. 1993. The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conserv. Biol. 7:480-488. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030480.x
  20. Steinberg, M. 2002. The second conquest: Religious conversion and the erosion of the cultural ecological core among the MopanMaya. J. Cult. Geogr. 20:91-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873630209478283
  21. Sujarwo, W., I. Bagus, K. Arinasa, F. Salomone, G. Caneva and S. Fattorini. 2014. Cultural erosion of Balinese indigenous knowledge of food and nutraceutical plants. Econ. Bot. 68:426-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-014-9288-1
  22. Voeks, R.A. and S. Bin Nyawa. 2006. Dusun ethnobotany: Forest knowledge and nomenclature in northern Borneo. J. Cult. Geogr. 23:1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873630609478221
  23. Williams, V.L., T. Edward, F. Witkowski and K. Balkwill. 2007. The use of incidence-based species richness estimators, species accumulation curves and similarity measures to appraise ethnobotanical inventories from South Africa. Biodivers. Conserv. 16:2495-2513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9026-9