참고문헌
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Summers, R., Said, Z., Wang, S., & Culbertson, M. (2015). Development and large-scale validation of an instrument to assess Arabic-speaking students' attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2637-2663. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1098789
- Aikenhead, G. (2001). Students' ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<180::AID-SCE50>3.0.CO;2-1
- Aikenhead, G., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
- Au, Y. (2007). A search on social desirability according to administered mode and demonstrable condition of a psychology testing. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20(4), 235-258.
- Bae, B., Lee, D., & Ham, K. (2015). Validation of the Korean short-version of social desirability scale(SDS-9) using the Rasch model. Korean Journal of Counseling, 16(6), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.16.4.201508.177
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Chi, E. (2011). Applying the Rasch model to explore the differences between countries for tests administered across countries. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(1), 89-106.
- Cho, Y. (2003). A study on I-consciousness-we-consciousness-relationships between I-consciousness-we-consciousness and individuality relatedness, psychosocial maturity, and interpersonal problem. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 15(1), 91-109.
- Cho, J., Kim, S., Kim, M., Ok, H., Lim, H., & Son, S. (2012). Ways of improving Korean students' affective characteristic based on PISA and TIMSS results. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Choe, S., Ku, J., Kim, J., Park, S., Oh, E., Kim, J., & Baek, H. (2013). Strategies for improving the affective characteristics of Korean students based on the results of PISA and TIMSS. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Choi, S. (2004). Social psychology of Korean people. The Korean Psychological Association, 2, 151-162.
- Chung, S., & Shin, D. (2016). Trends of assessment research in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 563-579. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0563
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Costa, V. (1995). When science is "another world": Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790306
- Cronbach, L. (1946). Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6(3), 475-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316444600600405
- Crowne, D., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
- Dudley, N., McFarland, L., Goodman, S., Hunt, S., & Sydell, E. (2005). Racial differences in socially desirable responding in selection contexts: Magnitude and consequences. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_05
- Ferrando, P., & Chico, E. (2001). Detecting dissimulation in personality test scores: A comparison between person-fit indices and detection scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 997-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971617
- Ferrari, J., Bristow, & Cowman, S. (2005). Looking good or being good? The role of social desirability tendencies in student perception of institutional mission and values. College Student Journal, 39(1), 7-13.
- Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115
- Ganster, D., Hennessey, H., & Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.2307/255979
- Heine, S., Lehman, D., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903-918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903
- Jűrges, H., Schneider, K., & Bűchel, F. (2005). The effect of central exit examinations on student achievement: Quasi-experimental evidence from TIMSS Germany. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(5), 1134-1155. https://doi.org/10.1162/1542476054729400
- Keillor, B., Owens, D., & Pettijohn, C. (2001). A cross-cultural/cross-national study of influencing factors and socially desirable response biases. International Journal of Market Research, 43(1), 63-84.
- Ku, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., Cho, S., & Park, H. (2016a). OECD Programme for International Student Assessment: An analysis of PISA 2015 results. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Ku, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., Cho, S., & Park, H. (2016b). OECD Programme for International Student Assessment: Establishing a foundation of PISA 2018 field trial. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Kim, S., Kim, K., & Park, J. (2014). The effect of mathematics achievement on changes in mathematics interest and values for middle school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 18(3), 683-701. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2014.18.3.683
- Kim, K., Kim, S., Kim, M., Kim, S., Kang, M., Park, H., & Jung, S. (2009). Comparative analysis of curriculum and achievement characteristics between Korea and high performing countries in PISA & TIMSS. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Kim, S. (2013). Measurement of social norms: An experimental study of response bias. Korean Political Studies, 22(2), 153-178.
- Kim, S., Seo, H. (2011). Self-regulated learning ability related to science inquiry skill and affective domain of science in middle school students. Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2011.35.2.307
- Kim, M., & Cho, J. (2013). Analysis of the properties of affective achievement in science based on TIMSS and science teachers' perception. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 46-62. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.046
- Kim, S., Park, J., Kim, H., Jin, E., Lee, M., Kim, J., Ahn, Y., & Seo, J. (2012). Findings from TIMSS for Korea: TIMSS 2011 international results. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Kim, Y. (2010). Development of a social desirability scale(SDS-24). Journal of Korean Social Welfare Administration, 12(3), 1-39.
- Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600909091
- Koballa, T. R. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720202
- Krynowsky, B. (1988). Problems in assessing student attitude in science education: A partial solution. Science Education, 72(4), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720504
- Kwak, Y. (2017). Exploration of features of Korean eighth grade students' attitudes toward science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0135
- Lee, J. (2016). Analysis of changes in the learning environments of middle school science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(5), 717-727. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.5.0717
- Lee, M., & Kim, K. (2004). Relationship between attitudes toward science and science achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 399-407.
- Lee, M., Sohn, W., & No, U. (2007). The results from PISA 2006. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Lee, M., Park, S., Sohn, W., & Nam, M. (2007). Technical report for PISA 2006 main study. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Lee, M., Choi, J., Lee, J., & Shin, M. (2016). A preliminary study of defensive response style on a self-report personality assessment. The Journal of the Korean Association of Psychotherapy, 8(2), 61-80.
- MaCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.6.882
- Martin, M., Mullis, I., & Foy, P. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international science report. MA: Boston College.
- Messick, S. (1991). Psychology and methodology of response styles. In R. E. Snow & D. E. Willey(Eds.). Improving inquires in social science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Ministry of Education Science, and Technology (2011). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 of MOEST. Seoul: MOEST.
- Mullis, I., Martin, M., & Foy, P. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international mathematics report. MA: Boston College.
- Murayama, K., Zhou, M., & Nesbit, J. (2009). A cross-cultural examination of the psychometric properties of response to the achievement goal questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(2), 266-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408322017
- Myeong, J., & Crawley, F. E. (1993). Predicting and understanding Korean high school students' science track choice: Testing the theory of reasoned action by structural equation modeling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300406
- Ones, D., Viswesvara, C., & Reiss, A. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.660
- Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
- Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Tytler, R. (2009). Attitudes towards science: An update. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California.
- Park, C. (2007). The trend in the Korean middle school student's affective variables toward mathematics and its effect on their mathematics achievement. The Mathematical Education, 46(1), 19-31.
- Park, C. Jeong, E., Kim, K., Han, K., Jun, H., & Lee, S. (2004). Teachers, instruction, and achievement based on TIMSS 1999. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Park, H., (2008). Test of group invariance for the structural model among motivation, self-concept and student achievement: Using PISA 2006 data. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(3), 43-67. https://doi.org/10.2167/eri413.0
- Paulhus, D. (1984). Two component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 589-609.
- Paulhus, D. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197-1208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1197
- Reise, S., & Flannery, W. (1996). Assessing person-fit on measures of typical performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0901_3
- Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.
- Sang, K., Kwak, Y., Park, J., & Park, S. (2016). The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): Findings from TIMSS 2015 for Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Schluf, Boaz, Hattie, J., & Dixon, R. (2008). Factors affecting responses to Likert type questionnaires: Introduction of the ImpExp, a new comprehensive model. Social Psychology of Education, 11(1), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-007-9035-x
- Schunk, D., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self efficacy theory. In Wentzel, K., & Wigfield, A. (Eds). Handbook of motivation at school. New York: Routledge.
- Seo, J., Choi, J., & Kim, Y. (2007). Comparison of life learning skills of gifted science students and normal students in high school. Biology Education, 35(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2007.35.1.61
- Shen, C., & Pedulla, J. (2000). The relationship between students' achievement and their self-perception of competence and rigour of mathematics and science: A cross-national analysis. Assessment in Education, 7(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110000700304
- Shin, H., & Sohn, W. (2014). Applying a mixed Rasch model to investigate response styles in TIMSS 2011 math enjoyment scale. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(2), 429-448.
- Sohn, W. (2017). Individual difference and consistency in response scale use. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 55(1), 23-43.
- Son, E., Cha, J., & Kim, A. (2007). Test of construct equivalence of personality inventory in low and high socially desirable responding groups. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 21(2), 71-87.
- Song, H. (2010). Development of a self-reported executive function rating scale for the Korean high school students: A preliminary study. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(1), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2010.29.1.007
- Stephen, A. (2000). A quantitative review of the effect of computerized testing on the measurement of social desirability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(3), 340-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970583
- Stober, J. (2001). The social desirability scale-17(SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.222
- Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Suzuki, L., & Ponterotto, J. (2007). Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Vailant, G. (1992). Ego mechanism of defense. Washington: American Psychiatric Press.
피인용 문헌
- 이공계 고등학생들의 과학 학습 경험의 의미 탐색: 인지적·정의적 성취 유형에 따른 공통점과 차이점을 중심으로 vol.22, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2018.22.3.163