DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal inspection frequency to mitigate the risk of building system failure

  • Au-Yong, Cheong Peng (Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture (BuCTA), Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya) ;
  • Ali, Azlan Shah (Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture (BuCTA), Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya) ;
  • Ahmad, Faizah (Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture (BuCTA), Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya) ;
  • Chua, Shirley Jin Lin (Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture (BuCTA), Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya)
  • Received : 2016.10.18
  • Accepted : 2017.08.01
  • Published : 2017.11.10

Abstract

The poor maintenance practice increases the possibility of system failure. Subsequently, the consequences of failure fall on the aspects of output, safety and healthy, environmental integrity, system quality, and customer satisfaction. Conditionbased maintenance is seen as a potential strategy to improve performance. Whereby, the key success factor of this maintenance strategy is identified as the system inspection. This study aims to investigate the association between system breakdown rate and frequency of inspection. A mixed method approach is implemented by distributing questionnaire and interviewing for data collection. Subsequently, descriptive analysis, correlation analysis and regression are adopted to analyse the collected data from 100 respondents and the results are validated with interview data of 10 interviewees. The research result establishes significant relationship between the system breakdown rate and the frequency of inspection. Additionally, the result of regression analysis confirms that the frequency of inspection is the significant predictor of system breakdown rate. Planning of accurate inspection frequency is crucial to secure the system performance. Hence, the research signifies the importance to carry out regular inspection towards the building systems and components. As a recommendation, the maintenance personnel should assess the risk criticality of the building systems. Then, continuously monitor the condition of critical building systems; regularly inspect the condition of non-critical building systems and randomly inspect all of them.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : University of Malaya

References

  1. Ali, A.S. (2009), "Cost decision making in building maintenance practice in Malaysia", J. Facil. Manage., 7(4), 298-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960910990044
  2. Au-Yong, C.P., Ali, A.S. and Ahmad, F. (2014a), "Prediction cost maintenance model of office building based on condition-based maintenance", Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc, Mainten. Reliab., 16(2), 319-324.
  3. Au-Yong, C.P., Ali, A.S. and Ahmad, F. (2014b), "Significant characteristics of scheduled and condition-based naintenance in office buildings", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 28(2), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000432
  4. Chan, K.T., Lee, R.H.K. and Burnett, J. (2001), "Maintenance performance: A case study of hospitality engineering systems", Facil., 19(13/14), 494-503. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770110409477
  5. Chen, H.P. and Nepal, J. (2015), "Stochastic modelling and lifecycle performance assessment of bond strength of corroded reinforcement in concrete", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(2), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.2.319
  6. Chore, H.S. and Shelke, N.L. (2013), "Prediction of compressive strength of concrete using multiple regression model", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(6), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.6.837
  7. Edward, D.J., Holt, G.D. and Harris, F.C. (1998), "Predictive maintenance techniques and their relevance to construction plant", J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 4(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552519810369057
  8. Eti, M.C., Ogaji, S.O.T. and Probert, S.D. (2006), "Development and implementation of preventive-maintenance practices in Nigerian industries", Appl. Energy, 83(10), 1163-1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2006.01.001
  9. Golmakani, H.R. and Pouresmaeeli, M. (2014), "Optimal replacement policy for condition-based maintenance with nondecreasing failure cost and costly inspection", J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 20(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-12-2012-0044
  10. Grall, A., Berenguer, C. and Dieulle, L. (2002), "A condition-based maintenance policy for stochastically deteriorating systems", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 76(2), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00148-X
  11. Halim, T., Muthusamy, K., Chia, S.Y. and Lam, S.W. (2011), "A systems approach in the evaluation and comparison of engineering services applied in facilities management", Facil., 29(3/4), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111109252
  12. Hameed, A., Khan, F. and Ahmed, S. (2016), "A risk-based shutdown inspection and maintenance interval estimation considering human error", Proc. Saf. Environ. Protect., 100, 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.11.011
  13. Hameed, Z., Ahn, S.H. and Cho, Y.M. (2010), "Practical aspects of a condition monitoring system for a wind turbine with emphasis on its design, system architecture, testing and installation", Renew. Energy, 35(5), 879-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.031
  14. Hoxley, M. (2008), Questionnaire Design and Factor Analysis, Eds. A. Knight and L. Ruddock, Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  15. Jardine, A.K.S., Lin, D. and Banjevic, D. (2006), "A review on machinery diagnostic and prognostics implementing conditionbased maintenance", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 20, 1483-1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012
  16. Kamaruzzaman, S.N. and Zawawi, E.M.A. (2010), "Development of facilities management in Malaysia", J. Facil. Manage., 8(1), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961011019094
  17. Kwak, R.Y., Takakusagi, A., Sohn, J.Y., Fujii, S. and Park, B.Y. (2004), "Development of an optimal preventive maintenance model based on the reliability assessment for air-conditioning facilities in office buildings", Build. Environ., 39(10), 1141-1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.01.029
  18. Lam, J.Y.J. and Banjevic, D. (2015), "A myopic policy for optimal inspection scheduling for condition based maintenance", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 144, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.06.009
  19. Lateef, O.A. (2008), "Building maintenance management in Malaysia", J. Build. Apprais., 4(3), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2008.27
  20. Lo, T.Y. and Choi, K.T.W. (2004), "Building defects diagnosis by infrared thermography", Struct. Survey, 22(5), 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800410571571
  21. Maaroufi, G., Chelbi, A., Rezg, N. and Daoud, A.K. (2015), "A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system", J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 21(2), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-11-2013-0074
  22. Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (2006), Designing Qualitative Research, 4th Edition, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, Inc.
  23. Moubray, J. (2007), Maintenance Management - A New Paradigm. Retrieved 6 January, 2016, from http://www.maintenanceresources.com/referencelibrary/rcm/maintparadigm.htm.
  24. Naser, A.F. and Zonglin, W. (2011), "Damage inspection and performance evaluation of Jilin highway double-curved arch concrete bridge in China", Struct. Eng. Mech., 39(4), 521-539. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.4.521
  25. Nik Mat, N.E.M. (2009), "Performance measurement of office buildings maintenance management", Master Unpublished Dissertation, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
  26. Ruslan, N. (2007), "Campus facilities management experience", Paper presented at the National Asset and Facilities Management (NAFAM) Convention, National Asset and Facility Management Development, 13 August, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  27. Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2009), Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 5th Edition, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  28. Sherwin, D. (2000), "A review of overall models for maintenance management", J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 6(3), 138-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510010341171
  29. Tsang, A.H.C. (1995), "Condition-based maintenance: tools and decision making", J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 1(3), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552519510096350
  30. Veldman, J., Klingenberg, W. and Wortmann, H. (2011), "Managing condition-based maintenance technology: A multiple case study in the process industry", J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 17(1), 40-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552511111116240
  31. Wu, S., Clements-Croome, D., Fairey, V., Albany, B., Sidhu, J., Desmond, D. and Neale, K. (2006), "Reliability in the whole life cycle of building systems", Eng. Constr. Arch. Manag., 13(2), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980610659607
  32. Yang, L., Ma, X., Zhai, Q. and Zhao, Y. (2016), "A delay time model for a mission-based system subject to periodic and random inspection and postponed replacement", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 150, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.016
  33. Yang, S.K. (2004), "A condition-based preventive maintenance arrangement for thermal power plants", Elec. Power Syst. Res., 72(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2004.03.007
  34. Yin, R.K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th Edition, Vol. 5, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publication, Inc.
  35. Zhang, J., Huang, X., Fang, Y., Zhou, J., Zhang, H. and Li, J. (2016), "Optimal inspection-based preventive maintenance policy for three-state mechanical components under competing failure modes", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 152, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.007

Cited by

  1. Optimising maintenance cost by prioritising maintenance of facilities services in residential buildings vol.26, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2018-0265
  2. Visualised inspection system for monitoring environmental anomalies during daily operation and maintenance vol.27, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-11-2019-0640