DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of dimensions and shapes of maxillary and mandibular dental arch in Korean young adults

  • Park, Su-Jung (Department of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Leesungbok, Richard (Department of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Song, Jae-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Chang, Se Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Suk-Won (Department of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Ahn, Su-Jin (Department of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2016.09.15
  • Accepted : 2017.04.20
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate dental arch dimensions and to classify arch shape in Korean young adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The sample included 50 Koreans with age ranging from 24 to 32 years. Maxillary and mandibular casts were fabricated using irreversible hydrocolloid and type III dental stones. Incisor-canine distance, $incisor-1^{st}$ molar distance, $incisor-2^{nd}$ molar distance, intercanine distance, $inter-1^{st}$ molar distance, and $inter-2^{nd}$ molar distance in both the maxillary and mandibular arch were measured using a three-dimensional measuring device. The dental arch was classified into three groups using five ratios from the measured values by the K-means clustering method. The data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS. Arch lengths (IM2D, $incisal-2^{nd}$ molar distance) were 44.13 mm in the maxilla and 40.40 mm in the mandible. Arch widths (M2W, inter $2^{nd}$ molar width) were 64.12 mm in the maxilla and 56.37 mm in the mandible. Distribution of the dental arch form was mostly ovoid shape (maxilla 52% and mandible 56%), followed by the V-shape and the U-shape. The arch width for the U-shape was broader than for the other forms. CONCLUSION. This study establishes new reference data for dental arch dimensions for young Korean adults. The most common arch form is the ovoid type in the maxilla and mandible of Koreans. Clinicians should be aware of these references and classify arch type before and during their dental treatment for effective and harmonized results in Koreans.

Keywords

References

  1. Smith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E. Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations: "does Bolton's analysis apply?". Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:169-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70228-9
  2. Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod 2006;76:459-65.
  3. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Colombo A, Carvajal R, Duncan V, Palomino H. Dental arch size in healthy human permanent dentitions: ethnic differences as assessed by discriminant analysis. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1999;14:153-62.
  4. Dalidjan M, Sampson W, Townsend G. Prediction of dental arch development: an assessment of Pont's Index in three human populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107:465-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70113-3
  5. Hassanali J, Pokhariyal GP. Anterior tooth relations in Kenyan Africans. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:337-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(93)90141-8
  6. Merz ML, Isaacson RJ, Germane N, Rubenstein LK. Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:53-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70049-3
  7. Hattab FN, al-Khateeb S, Sultan I. Mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth in Jordanians. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41:641-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(96)00066-0
  8. Nummikoski P, Prihoda T, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, Welander U, Tronje G. Dental and mandibular arch widths in three ethnic groups in Texas: a radiographic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;65:609-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(88)90146-6
  9. Townsend GC, Brown T. Heritability of permanent tooth size. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;49:497-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330490409
  10. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sex difference in tooth size. J Dent Res 1964;43:306. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345640430022401
  11. Jacobson A. The craniofacial skeletal pattern of the South African Negro. Am J Orthod 1978;73:681-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90229-4
  12. Chan GK. A cephalometric appraisal of the Chinese (Cantonese). Am J Orthod 1972;61:279-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90079-6
  13. Gresham H. A comparison of skeletal and denture patterns in Australian and North American children. Aust Dent J 1965;10:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1965.tb01591.x
  14. Kim SH, Chung HJ. The relationship between clinical crown form and gingival feature in upper anterior region. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2005;35:761-76. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2005.35.3.761
  15. Nam JH, Lee KS. An analysis about mandibular dental arch on normal dentition of Koreans. Korean J Orthod 1996;26: 535-64.
  16. Oh YR, Lee SB, Park NS, Choi DG. An analysis about maxillary dental arch shape on adult Koreans. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1995;33:753-68.
  17. Song DS, Jin TH, Dong JG. A study of the fitness of stock tray in Korean adults. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1989;27: 131-41.
  18. Kwon YC, Sung JO, Kwon OW, Sung JH. The dental arch form in normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 1989;19:95-106.
  19. Yu JD. An anthropological analysis about dental arch on Koreans. J Korean Dent Acad 1975;13:533-8.
  20. Chung HI. A study on the normal dental arch form of Korean adult. Korean J Orthod 1972;3:7-13.
  21. Cho JH, Lee KS. A study of dental arch form in normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 1984;14:249-62.
  22. Lee YC, Park YC. A study on the dental arch by occlusogram in normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 1987;17:279-88.
  23. Kim IH, Choi DG. A study of mandibular dental arch of Korean adults. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:166-82.
  24. Jun S, Ha K, Chung S, Joung H. Meat and milk intake in the rice-based Korean diet: impact on cancer and metabolic syndrome. Proc Nutr Soc 2016;75:374-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000112
  25. Cho Y, Shin MJ, Chung HK. Effects of diet modification on meal quality and quality of life in korean diabetic patients: data from Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (2007-2011). Clin Nutr Res 2014;3:106-14. https://doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2014.3.2.106
  26. Lee M, Chae SW, Cha YS, Cho MS, Oh HY, Kim MK. Development of a Korean Diet Score (KDS) and its application assessing adherence to Korean healthy diet based on the Korean Food Guide Wheels. Nutr Res Pract 2013;7:49-58. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2013.7.1.49
  27. BeGole EA. Application of the cubic spline function in the description of dental arch form. J Dent Res 1980;59:1549-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590092901
  28. Marcotte MR. The use of the occlusogram in planning orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1976;69:655-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90148-2
  29. White LW. The clinical use of occlusograms. J Clin Orthod 1982;16:92-103.
  30. Lee KJ, Trang VT, Bayome M, Park JH, Kim Y, Kook YA. Comparison of mandibular arch forms of Korean and Vietnamese patients by using facial axis points on three-dimensional models. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:288-93. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.6.288

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Growth and Development of Late Mixed Dentition Upper Dental Arch with Normal Occlusion Using 3-Dimensional Digital Models vol.2019, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4191848
  2. Correlation between age and dental arch dimension of Javanese children vol.53, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v53.i2.p93-98
  3. Individualization of the dental arch as a potential tool in forensic human identification vol.6, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijfo.ijfo_22_21