DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

선박 운송용 컨테이너의 활동 및 전도발생 풍속 평가를 위한 풍동실험

Wind Tunnel Tests for Evaluation of Sliding and Overturning Velocities on Shipping Containers

  • Kim, Wonsul (Coastal Development Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Yi, Jin-Hak (Coastal Development Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Yoshida, Akihito (Wind Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Polytechnic University)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.20
  • 심사 : 2017.10.26
  • 발행 : 2017.10.31

초록

이 연구에서는 풍동실험을 이용하여 선박 운송용 컨테이너의 풍력특성을 조사하고, 그 결과를 토대로 컨테이너의 크기 및 중량에 따른 피해발생 풍속을 평가하고자 한다. 실험결과, 컨테이너 폭의 직각방향에 작용하는 평균 풍력계수는 12ft, 20ft, 40ft, 40ft high cube 순으로 증가하는 것으로 나타났으며, 이와 달리 깊이의 직각방향에 작용하는 평균 풍력계수는 40ft high cube, 40ft, 20ft, 12ft 순으로 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 이유는 컨테이너의 풍상면(windward surface)의 모서리에서 박리된 난류의 전단층(shear layer)이 다시 컨테이너의 측면에 재부착(reattachment)되면서 깊이의 직각 방향에 작용하는 평균 풍력계수가 줄어든 것으로 판단된다. 전 풍향에서 컨테이너의 중량에 따른 피해발생 풍속을 평가한 결과, 컨테이너의 전도보다는 활동이 낮은 풍속에서 발생할 수 있음을 알 수 있다. 이때 가장 불리한 컨테이너는 40ft high cube이며, 활동발생 및 전도발생이 일어날 수 있는 풍속은 각각 20.4 m/s와 26.8 m/s으로 평가되었다. 또한 이 연구에서는 컨테이너의 중량과 피해발생 풍속과의 상관을 토대로 컨테이너의 중량에 따른 활동발생 및 전도발생 풍속을 평가할 수 있는 평가식을 제안하였다. 본 연구 결과는 컨테이너의 고박 설치하중평가 및 적재방법 등에 관한 가이드라인 정립에 있어 유용하게 활용될 것으로 판단된다.

In this study, wind characteristics of a shipping container were investigated through the wind tunnel test (high-frequency force balance test), and damage occurrence velocities of various containers with weights were evaluated based on results of the wind tunnel tests. As a result, mean wind force coefficients acting on containers in x-direction increased in the order of 12ft, 20ft, 40ft and 40ft high cube. On the other hand, mean wind force coefficients at y-direction increased in the order of 40ft high cube, 40ft, 20ft and 12ft. It was suggested that the shear layer separated from the corner of windward surface of the container is reattached on the sides of it, and then the mean wind force coefficient is weaker. As a result of the damage occurrence velocity on containers with weights, it was found that the probability of occurrence of sliding is higher rather than that of overturning. Further, the most unfavorable container was 40ft high cube, and the sliding and overturning occurrence velocities were 20.4 m/s and 26.8 m/s, respectively. Furthermore, the regression formula for sliding and overturing occurrence velocitys were proposed based on the results of relationship between weights of containers and damage occurrence velocities. These results are expected to be useful in establishing a guideline for external force estimation acting on container securing equipment and stacking way.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. National Building Code of Canada (NBCC 2010). National Research Council of Canada (NRC).
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE/SEI 7-10). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.
  3. An, T.W., Lee, S.W., Han, D.S., Kim, T.H. and Han, G.J. (2008). A study on the effect of wind load to an articulated type container crane by fluid-structural coupled field analysis. Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 32(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2008.32.1.023
  4. Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ 2004). Wind Loads Recommendations for Loads on Buildings.
  5. Cargo Loading and Securing Manual (2015), Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries.
  6. International Electrotechnical Commission (2009). IEC 61400-3, IEC, 22.
  7. Kim, D., Oh, B.C. and Chun, I. (2005). Effect of wind velocity variation on safety factor of container crane tie-downs. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 25(6), 1127-1131.
  8. Kim, T.H. and Lee, S.W. (2010). An estimation of wind resistant structural stability of a container crane according to the boom shape. Journal of Korean Soc. of Mechanical Technology, 12(4), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.17958/ksmt.12.4.201012.41
  9. Kim, W., Yoshida, A. and Tamura, Y. (2015). Correlation analysis of aerodynamic forces acting on tall buildings with various side ratios. J. Comput. Struct. Eng. Inst. Korea 28(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2015.28.2.153
  10. Korean Building Code and Commentary (KBC, 2016). Architectural Institute of Korea.
  11. Ko, D.H., Jeong, S.T., Cho, H., Kim, J.Y. and Kang, K.S. (2012). Error analysis on the offshore wind speed estimation using HeMOSU-1 data. Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, 24(5), 326-332. https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2012.24.5.326
  12. Ko, D.H., Jeong, S.T., Cho, H., Jun, K.C. and Kim, Y.C. (2013). Estimation on the radius of maximum wind speed using RSMC best track data. Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, 25(5), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2013.25.5.291
  13. Laneville, A., Gartshore, I.S. and Parkinson, G.V. (1975). An explanation of some effects of turbulence on bluff bodies, Fourth International Conference on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, London, U.K., September.
  14. Lee, S.H., Han, D.H. and Han, G.J. (2009). Wind load analysis owing to the computation fluid dynamics and wind tunnel test of a container crane. Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 33(3), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2009.33.3.215
  15. Lee, S.W., Shim, J.J., Han, D.S., Park, J.S., Han, G.J., Lee, K.S. and Kim, T.H. (2005). The effect of wind load on the stability of a container crane. Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering, 22(2), 148-155.
  16. Liu, H. (1991). Wind Engineering - A Handbook for Structural Engineers -, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  17. Seo, K.W. (2004). Disaster characteristics analysis at busan coastal areas by typhoon maemi in 2003. Journal the Korean Society of Ocean Engineerings, 18(2), 25-32.
  18. Wu, Z., Peng, X. and Zhang, C. (2011). Overturning Analysis of Harbor Containers Based on Wind Tunnel Test of Rigid Models, 2011 International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil Engineering (ICETCE), Lushan, China.