한국해안·해양공학회논문집 (Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers)

  • 제29권5호
  • /
  • Pages.217-227
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1976-8192(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2227(eISSN)
한국해안·해양공학회 (Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경기만 염하수로에서의 잔차류 및 수송량의 대조-소조 변동과 단면 특성

The Cross-Sectional Characteristic and Spring-Neap Variation of Residual Current and Net Volume Transport at the Yeomha Channel

  • Lee, Dong Hwan (GeoSystem Research Corporation) ;
  • Yoon, Byung Il (Department of Ocean Science, College of Natural Science, Inha University) ;
  • Woo, Seung-Buhm (Department of Ocean Science, College of Natural Science, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.20
  • 심사 : 2017.10.14
  • 발행 : 2017.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

경기만 염하수로에서 시 공간적으로 변화하는 총수송량과 잔차류를 산정하고자 소조기와 대조기에 염하수로의 하류(정선-1), 염하수로 중간 지점(정선-2)에서 13시간 동안 단면 유속을 관측하였다. 총수송량은 Eulerian flux와 Stokes drift의 합인 Lagrange flux로 계산하였고, 잔차류는 최소자승법을 이용하여 구하였다. 총수송량과 잔차류의 계산은 관측 시간별, 수평 수직 sigma 좌표계로 변환하여 수행하였다. 변환된 sigma 좌표체계는 z-level 좌표 체계와 비교하였을 때 주 방향 유속 오차가 3~5% 내외로 자료 분석에 무리가 없는 것으로 판단되었다. 분석결과 단면 잔차류는 정선-1에서는 대조기에 주 수로 방향에서 북향, 수로 양 끝 단에서 남향하였으며, 소조기에는 수직적으로 표층에서는 창조, 저층에서는 낙조하는 이층흐름 구조를 보였다. 반면 정선-2에서는 대조, 소조 모두 남향(낙조)하였다. 한편 총수송량은 정선-1에서는 대조 시와 소조 시에 각각 $359m^3s^{-1}$, $248m^3s^{-1}$로 북향(창조), 정선-2에서 대조 시와 소조 시에 각각 $576m^3s^{-1}$, $67m^3s^{-1}$로 남향(낙조)하였다. 정선 별 공간 수송량 차이로 영종도와 강화도 사이의 조간대 지역의 순 유출량을 추정하였으며, 크기는 대조기와 소조기에 각각 $935m^3s^{-1}$, $315m^3s^{-1}$로 나타났다. 이처럼 대 소조기와 공간적 특성에 따라 잔차류와 순 수송량이 변화되는 주된 요인은 순압력구배와 Stokes drift가 복합적으로 작용한 결과이다.

The object of this study is to estimate the net volume transport and the residual flow that changed by space and time at southern part of Yeomha channel, Gyeonggi Bay. The cross-section observation was conducted at the mid-part (Line2) and the southern end (Line1) of Yeomha channel for 13 hours during neap and spring-tides, respectively. The Lagrange flux is calculated as the sum of Eulerian flux and Stokes drift, and the residual flow is calculated by using least square method. It is necessary to unify the spatial area of the observed cross-section and average time during the tidal cycle. In order to unify the cross-sectional area containing such a large vertical tidal variation, it was necessary to convert into sigma coordinate system by horizontally and vertically for every hour. The converted sigma coordinate system is estimated to be 3~5% error when compared with the z-level coordinate system which shows that there is no problem for analyzing the data. As a result, the cross-sectional residual flow shows a southward flow pattern in both spring and neap tides at Line2, and also have characteristic of the spatial residual flow fluctuation: it northwards in the main line direction and southwards at the end of both side of the waterway. It was confirmed that the residual flow characteristics at Line2 were changed by the net pressure due to the sea level difference. The analysis of the net volume transport showed that it tends to southwards at $576m^3s^{-1}$, $67m^3s^{-1}$ in each spring tide and neap tide at Line2. On the other hand, in the control Line1, it has tendency to northwards at $359m^3s^{-1}$ and $248m^3s^{-1}$. Based on the difference between the two observation lines, it is estimated that net volume transport will be out flow about $935m^3s^{-1}$ at spring tide stage and about $315m^3s^{-1}$ at neap tide stage as the intertidal zone between Yeongjong Island and Ganghwa Island. In other words, the difference of pressure gradient and Stokes drift during spring and neap tide is main causes of variation for residual current and net volume transport.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ca'ceres, M. and Valle-Levinson, A. (2003). Observations of crosschannel structure of flow in an energetic tidal channel. J. Geophys Res., 108, 1-10.
  2. Hwang, S.C., Jeon, D.C., Kang, J.H. and Kim, C.S. (2004). Development of fixing apparatus available to mount-and-detach ADCP on a small vessel. Ocean and Polar Res., 26(3), 481-486 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2004.26.3.481
  3. Im, H.H. (1999). A Study on the Han-river Flows Using Numerical Model. MS Thesis, Inha University, Incheon, Korea (in Korean).
  4. Joyce, T.M. (1989). On in situ "Calibration" of shipboard ADCPs. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 6, 169-172. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1989)006<0169:OISOSA>2.0.CO;2
  5. Kim, C.S., Lim, H.S., Kim, J.A., Kim, S.J., Park, K.S. and Jung, K.T. (2010). Estimation of tidal residual flow and its variability in Kyunggi Bay of Korea. J. Kor. Soc. Coast. Ocean Eng., 22(6), 353-360 (in Korean).
  6. Kim, H.S. (1997). Numerical modeling of tidal dynamics and salinity distributions in Gyounggi Bay. MS Thesis, Inha University, Incheon, Korea (in Korean).
  7. Kim, M.H. and Woo, S.-B. (2013). Characteristics of mass transport depending on the feature of tidal creek at han river estuary, Gyeong-gi Bay, South Korea. J. Kor. Soc. Coast. Ocean Eng., 25(2), 41-51 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2013.25.2.41
  8. Kjerfve, B. (1975). Velocity averaging in estuaries characterized by a large tidal range to depth ratio. Est. and Coast. Mar. Cci., 3, 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0302-3524(75)90031-6
  9. Kreeke, J. van de. (1992). Residual flow in Naples Bay and its effect on constituent concentration, constituent flux and residence time. Dynamics and exchanges in estuaries and the coastal zone (D. Prandle, Ed.), 117-133.
  10. Lee, D.H., Yoon, B.I., Kim, J.W., Gu, B.H. and Woo, S.-B. (2012). The cross-sectional mass flux observation at Yeomha Channel, Gyeonggi Bay at spring tide during dry and flood season. J. Kor. Soc. Coast. Ocean Eng., 24(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2012.24.1.016
  11. Lwiza, K.M.M., Bowers, D.G. and Simpson, J.H. (1991). Residual and tidal flow at a tidal mixing front in the North Sea. Continental Shelf Res., 11(11), 1379-1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(91)90041-4
  12. Oh, J.K. and Bang, K.Y. (2003). Sedimentologic Linkage of depositional environments of Han River and Kyunggi Bay, The Sea. J. Korean Soc. Oceanogr., 8(3), 225-236 (in Korean).
  13. Park, K., Oh, J.H., Kim, H.S. and Im, H.H. (2002). Case study: Mass transport mechanism in Kyunggi Bay around Han River mouth. Korea J. Hydraulic Eng., 128(3), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:3(257)
  14. Preisendorfer, R.W. and Mobley, C.D. (1988). Principal Component Analysis in Meteorology and Oceanogr. Elsevier, 425p.
  15. Song, Y.S. and Woo, S.-B. (2011). Periodic characteristics of long period tidal current by variation of the tide deformation around the Yeomha Waterway. J. Kor. Soc. Coast. Ocean Eng., 23(5), 394-400 (in Korean).
  16. Sylaios, G. and Boxall, S.R. (1988). Residual currents and flux estimates in a partially mixed estuary. Est. Coastal Shelf Sci., 46, 671-682.
  17. Valle-Levinson, A. (1999). Spatial gradients in the flow over an estuarine channel. Estuaries, 22, 179-193. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352975
  18. Valle-Levinson, A., Wong, K.C. and Lwiza, K.M.M. (2000). Fortnightly variability in the transverse dynamics of a coastal plain estuary. J. Geophys Res., 105, 3413-3424. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900307
  19. Yanagi, T., Manabu, M., Nomuram, M. and Furukawa, K. (2003). Spring-neap tidal variation of residual flow in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Continental Shelf Res., 23, 1087-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(03)00102-X
  20. Yoon, B.I. and Woo, S.-B. (2012). Numerical study on spring-neap variability of net volume transport at Yeomha channel in the Han River estuary. J. Kor. Soc. Coast. Ocean Eng., 24(4), 257-268 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2012.24.4.257
  21. Yoon, B.I. and Woo, S.-B. (2011). Study on relationship between geographical convergence and bottom friction at the major waterways in Han River estuary using the tidal wave propagation characteristics. J. Kor. Soc. Coast. Ocean Eng., 23(5), 383-392 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2011.23.5.383
  22. Zimmerman, J.T.F. (1979). On the Euler-Lagrange transformation and the Stokes' drift in the presence of oscillatory and residual currents. Deep-sea Res., 26A, 505-520.