한국항해항만학회지 (Journal of Navigation and Port Research)

  • 제41권5호
  • /
  • Pages.287-296
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8470(eISSN)
한국항해항만학회 (Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on FSA Application to PRS for Safe Operation of Dynamic Positioning Vessel

  • Chae, Chong-Ju (Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Jun, Yun-Chul (Div. of Navigation Systems Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.07
  • 심사 : 2017.10.16
  • 발행 : 2017.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) is a structured and systematic methodology developed by the IMO, aimed at assessing the risk of vessels and recommending the method to control intolerable risks, thereby enhancing maritime safety, including protection of life, health, the marine environment and property, by using risk analysis and cost-benefit assessment. While the FSA has mostly been applied to merchant vessels, it has rarely been applied to a DP vessel, which is one of the special purpose vessels in the offshore industry. Furthermore, most of the FSA has been conducted so far by using the Fault Tree Analysis tool, even though there are many other risk analysis tools. This study carried out the FSA for safe operation of DP vessels by using the Bayesian network, under which conditional probability was examined. This study determined the frequency and severity of DP LOP incidents reported to the IMCA from 2001 to 2010, and obtained the Risk Index by applying the Bayesian network. Then, the Risk Control Options (RCOs) were identified through an expert brainstorming and DP vessel simulations. This study recommends duplication of PRS, regardless of the DP class and PRS type and DP system specific training. Finally, this study verified that the Bayesian network and DP simulator can also serve as an effective tool for FSA implementation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 이종갑, 나성, 김홍태, 박재홍(2011), "국적일반화물선 초기 안전성평가(High-level FSA) 연구(2)", 한국항해항만학회지 제35권 제1호, pp. 23-30. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2011.35.1.23
  2. 한국해양수산개발원(2012), Measures to Encourage OSV Market Entrance for National Wealth Creation(국부창출을 위한 OSV 시장진출 활성화 방안 연구), p. 39.
  3. BAYESFUSION, LLC, 2015. Data Analytics, Mathematical Modeling, Decision Support. http://www.bayesfusion.com/#!downloads/rxu9q.
  4. C. J. Chae, 2016. "An Application of FSA for Safe Operation of Dynamic Positioning Vessels", Navigation System Engineering, KMOU, Busan, pp. 51-55, pp. 57-58, pp. 60-62, p. 64, pp. 70-81
  5. C. J. Chae and Y. C. Jung, 2015. An Analysis on Incident cases of Dynamic Positioning Vessels, J. Navig. Port Res, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 150-153.
  6. CLARKSON, 2012. Overview of the Offshore Supply Vessel Industry, p. 10.
  7. IEC, 2009. Risk assessment techniques, risk management, international standard, IEC/FDIS 31010, pp. 21-27, p. 76, pp. 51-53. pp. 79-81.
  8. IMO, 2000. Formal Safety Assessment, Decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria, pp. 3-10, p. 20.
  9. IMO, 2005. Passenger ship Safety, Effective Voyage Planning for Passenger ship's, FSA-Large Passenger Ships-Navigational Safety, Norway. Nav 51/10, pp. 36-37.
  10. IMO, 2006. Formal Safety Assessment, Consideration of utilization of Bayesian network at step 3 of FSA, Evaluation of the effect of ECDIS, ENC and Track control by using the Bayesian Network, Japan. MSC 81/18/1, pp. 2-4.
  11. IMO, 2006. Formal Safety Assessment, Possible improvements on FSA guidelines, MSC 82/INF. 3, p. 5, pp. 14-15.
  12. IMO, 2007. Formal Safety Assessment, FSA - container vessels, Denmark. MSC 83/21/2, pp. 16-17.
  13. IMO, 2007. Formal Safety Assessment, FSA - Liquefied Natural Gas(LNG) carriers, Denmark. MSC 83/21/1, pp. 15-17.
  14. IMO, 2007, Consolidated text of the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment for use in the IMO rule-making process MSC 83/INF. 2, pp. 49-55, pp. 60-62.
  15. IMO, 2008. Formal Safety Assessment(FSA)-Crude Oil Tankers, MEPC 58/17/2, p. 116.
  16. IMO, 2008. Formal Safety Assessment, FSA - Crude Oil Tankers, Denmark. MEPC 58/INF. 2, p. 132, pp. 136-137.
  17. IMO, 2008. Formal Safety Assessment, FSA - Cruise ships, Denmark. MSC 85/17/1, pp. 18-19.
  18. IMO, 2013. MSC-MEPC. 2/Circ.12. Revised guidelines for formal safety assessment(FSA) for use in the IMO Rule-making process, p. 3, p. 11, p.15, pp. 25-27, p. 45, p 50, p. 53.
  19. IMCA, 1994. Risk analysis of collision of Dynamically positioned support vessel with offshore installation, pp. 16-20.
  20. Shi Phillips and Martinez, 2005. Case Study of DP Vessels Performing SIMOPS, DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE, p. 2.
  21. Sorensen, L. J. et al, 2014. Understanding Human Decision Making During Critical Incidents in Dynamic Positioning, Department of Maritime Technology and Innovation Marine Human Factors Group, Vestfold University College, pp. 1-7.