한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제21권3호
  • /
  • Pages.45-53
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 대형복합재난의 재난대응체계 개선방향

Strategy for Improvement of Disaster Response System of Hybrid Disaster in Korea

  • 투고 : 2017.01.18
  • 심사 : 2017.03.28
  • 발행 : 2017.05.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

대형복합재난은 자연재난과 사회재난이 연쇄적 또는 동시다발적으로 발생함에 따라 예측 가능한 범위 밖의 거대한 규모로 전개되는 재난을 의미한다. 대형복합재난은 재난의 동시성과 연쇄성으로 전혀 새로운 형태로 변화되어 기존의 재난관리방식과 다른 새로운 관리방식이 필요하게 된다. 이에 본 연구는 대형복합재난을 대상으로 선진외국의 복합재난대응체계를 검토하여 국내 복합재난 대응체계에 필요한 정책적 개선방향을 제시하였다.

Hybrid disaster refers to a type of unexpectedly large-scale disaster that results from continuous or simultaneous occurrence of natural and social disasters. Since hybrid disaster is a completely new type of disaster that has simultaneity and continuity, it requires a different management method compared to the conventional disaster management method. Accordingly, this study suggested policy directions for hybrid disaster response system of Korea after reviewing hybrid disaster response systems in developed foreign nations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beroux, P. Guilhou, X. & Lagadec, P. (2009), Implementing Rapid Reflection Forces, Crisis Response, 3(2), 36-37.
  2. Cabinet Office. (2012), Chapter 1 Introduction-Revision to Emergency Preparedness. Civil Contingencies Act Enhancement Programme.
  3. CO. (2012), Civil Contingencies Act Enhancement Programme, Chapter 1 Introduction-Revision to Emergency Preparedness, Cabinet Office.
  4. DHS. (2006), The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, D.C. 12-16, 51-64.
  5. DHS. (2013), National Response Framework, Department of Homeland Security.
  6. FEMA. (2008a), Mass Evacuation Incident Annex, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  7. FEMA. (2008b), Catastrophic Incident Annex, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  8. FEMA. (2008c), Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Support Annex, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  9. Jeong, J. (2015), Large-Scale hybrid Disaster Legal Basis Establishment Study.
  10. Kim, B., and Jeong, J. (2011), Disaster Management Plan against New Types of Disasters, National Institute for Disaster Prevention.
  11. Kim, C., Jeong, D., Lim, S., and Lee, Y. (2011), Disaster Policy Advancement Project Research in Line with Future Environment Changes, National Emergency Management Agency.
  12. Knabb, D., Rhome, R., and Brown, P. (2011), Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Katrina, National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration.
  13. Krausmann, E. (2010), Analysis of Natech Risk Reduction in EU Member States Using a Questionnaire Survey, EUR Report 24661 EN. European Union. 103-114.
  14. Lee, J., and Kim, G. (2005), Natural Disasters and Prevention System, Korea Information Society Development Institute.
  15. Lee, J., and Lee, W. (2014), Korea's hybrid Disaster Response and Crisis Management System Development Direction, Korea Review of Crisis and Emergency Management.
  16. Leo, M. (2012)., Analysis of Japan's Enacted/Amended Legislations Corresponding to Fukushima Earthquake/Nuclear Accident, Korea Legislation Research Institute.
  17. LRP. (2014), London Risk Register, Version 3.0.
  18. NGACPR. (1979), Comprehensive Emergency Management: A Governor's Guide, Washington: National Governors' Association.
  19. Oh, Y. (2013), Natech Disaster Management Plan Study, Korea Institute of Public Administration.
  20. Wu, H., and Kim, H. (2005), Occurrence and Damage Status of Hurricane Katrina on U.S. Gulf in August, Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineers.

피인용 문헌

  1. 주거용 건축물의 화재 예방에 관한 고찰 vol.23, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21289/ksic.2020.23.2.307
  2. 한·일 공항비상계획 비교 및 체크인카운터의 항공사 직원 비상대응 실태조사 vol.13, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.21729/ksds.2020.13.2.11