DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of time interval between capecitabine intake and radiotherapy on local recurrence-free survival in preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

  • Kim, Yeon Joo (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jong Hoon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yu, Chang Sik (Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae Won (Department of Medical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Se Jin (Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Eun Kyung (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jin Cheon (Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Wonsik (Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.03.02
  • Accepted : 2017.03.28
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The concentration of capecitabine peaks at 1-2 hours after administration. We therefore assumed that proper timing of capecitabine administration and radiotherapy would maximize radiosensitization and influence survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 223 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent preoperative chemoradiation, followed by surgery from January 2002 to May 2006. All patients underwent pelvic radiotherapy (50 Gy/25 fractions) and received capecitabine twice daily at 12-hour intervals ($1,650mg/m^2/day$). Patients were divided into two groups according to the time interval between capecitabine intake and radiotherapy. Patients who took capecitabine 1 hour before radiotherapy were classified as Group A (n = 109); all others were classified as Group B (n = 114). Results: The median follow-up period was 72 months (range, 7 to 149 months). Although Group A had a significantly higher rate of good responses (44% vs. 25%; p = 0.005), the 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates of 93% in Group A and 97% in Group B did not differ significantly (p = 0.519). The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were also comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Despite the better pathological response in Group A, the time interval between capecitabine and radiotherapy administration did not have a significant effect on survivals. Further evaluations are needed to clarify the interaction of these treatment modalities.

Keywords

References

  1. Gerard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4620-5. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7629
  2. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1114-23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa060829
  3. Braendengen M, Tveit KM, Berglund A, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing preoperative radiotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3687-94. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3858
  4. Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1926-33. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836
  5. Andre T, Boni C, Navarro M, et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3109-16. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6771
  6. Rodel C, Graeven U, Fietkau R, et al. Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:979-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00159-X
  7. Gerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, et al. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1638-44. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8376
  8. Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S, et al. Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2773-80. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911
  9. Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M, et al. Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1274-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00058-6
  10. Ishikawa T, Utoh M, Sawada N, et al. Tumor selective delivery of 5-fluorouracil by capecitabine, a new oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, in human cancer xenografts. Biochem Pharmacol 1998;55:1091-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(97)00682-5
  11. Saif MW. Targeting cancers in the gastrointestinal tract: role of capecitabine. Onco Targets Ther 2009;2:29-41.
  12. Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:579-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70116-X
  13. O'Connell MJ, Martenson JA, Wieand HS, et al. Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protractedinfusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. N Engl J Med 1994;331:502-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199408253310803
  14. Reigner B, Blesch K, Weidekamm E. Clinical pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001;40:85-104. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200140020-00002
  15. Cassidy J, Dirix L, Bissett D, et al. A Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with oral leucovorin in patients with intractable solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:2755-61.
  16. Mackean M, Planting A, Twelves C, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2977-85. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1998.16.9.2977
  17. Yu CS, Kim TW, Kim JH, et al. Optimal time interval between capecitabine intake and radiotherapy in preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:1020-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.013
  18. Kim JC, Kim HC, Yu CS, et al. Efficacy of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasonography compared with conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography in preoperative rectal cancer staging. Am J Surg 2006;192:89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.054
  19. Bedi M, Das P, Skibber JM, et al. Capecitabine and timing of radiotherapy during preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res 2007;1:44-8.

Cited by

  1. Nadir/pre-chemoradiotherapy ratio of white blood-cell count can predict tumor response and recurrence-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multi-institutional analysis vol.34, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3174-8