Knowledge Management Research (지식경영연구)

The Knowledge Management Society of Korea (한국지식경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Academic Identity through the Profiling and Co-Word Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Knowledge Management Research

국내외 지식경영연구의 주제어 프로파일링 및 동시출현분석을 통한 학문정체성에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2017.06.13
  • Published : 2017.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to compare the main subjects of domestic and foreign knowledge management research in terms of keywords and to clarify whether domestic knowledge management research reflects research trends in overseas knowledge management research. Specifically, we try to find out whether the central activities such as knowledge sharing, knowledge generation, and acquisition, which are knowledge management activities of knowledge management research, are being studied without bias. In order to analyze this, we analyzed the data of domestic and foreign knowledge management research for the last 5 years from 2012 to 2016. In Korea, the Knowledge Management Society of Korea collected 167 papers and 787 keywords, and collected 132 papers and 640 keywords from the Korea Society of Management Information Systems in order to distinguish the research areas. Overseas papers collected 315 papers and 1,746 keywords published by Emerald. Also, we collected 382 papers and 1,633 keywords in the Korean Management Review and collected 646 papers and 2,879 keywords in the Korean Business Education Review. Frequency analysis and network analysis of 1,642 papers and 7,685 keywords are summarized as follows. The Knowledge Management Society of Korea has focused on knowledge sharing, and in 2016, interest in knowledge transfer and knowledge search has shifted. The Journal of Knowledge Management, which is published by Emerald, has been a major concern for knowledge transfer and knowledge sharing. The research trends of the Korea Society of Management Information Systems to distinguish a clear identity of knowledge management research are focusing on smart area and mobile domain such as information security domain, cloud, smart phone, and smart work. In the Korea Society of Management Information Systems research, the main subject of knowledge sharing is also commonly found.

Keywords

References

  1. 강범일, 박지홍 2013. "프로파일링 분석과 동시출현 단어 분석을 이용한 한국어교육학의 정체성 분석", 정보관리학회지(30:4), pp. 195-213. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.195
  2. 강정인, 정승현 2010. "현대 한국정치학의 정체성담론: 역사적 고찰", 사회과학연구 (18:1), pp. 8-43.
  3. 변우희, 조광익, 김기태, 한상현 2008. "관광학 연구동향 및 교육과정 분석과 '관광학 총론'의 구성체계", 관광학연구 (32:4), pp. 35-53.
  4. 오정준 2014. "관광 연구의 정체성과 방법론에 대한 비판적 고찰", 한국사진지리학회지(24:1), pp. 107-118.
  5. 이경진, 박재홍 2016. "모바일 어플리케이션이 오프라인 시장에 미치는 영향: 콜택시와 카카오택시를 중심으로", Information Systems Review (18:4), pp. 141-154.
  6. 이동현, 이호, 김정민 2016, "그래프 이론 및 네트워크 모델을 이용한 지식경영연구 논문 트랜드 분석", 지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research) (17:1), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2016.17.1.001
  7. 이의방, 이재범, 양창규 2014. "크라우드펀딩의 투자의사결정기준에 관한 연구", Information Systems Review (16:2), pp. 25-41. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2014.16.2.025
  8. 이해영 2012. "한국과 중국 및 일본의 정책학 정체성 비교연구", 한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집, pp. 391-420.
  9. 임병하, 강동원 2014. "폐쇄형 SNS에서 프라이버시가 지속적인 사용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 밴드 사용자를 중심으로", Information Systems Review (16:3), pp. 191-214. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2014.16.3.191
  10. 임재완, 박병호 2016. "모바일 개인방송 시청요인분석: HMSAM 모델을 중심으로", Information Systems Review (18:4), pp .89-106. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2016.18.4.089
  11. 장령령, 홍현진 2014. "학술지 중요도와 키워드 순서를 고려한 단어동시출현 분석을 이용한 독서분야의 지적구조분석", 한국비블리아학회지 (25:1), pp. 295-318. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.295
  12. 전현규, 이건창 2015, "긍정감정과 부정감정이 개인의 지식기영 및 활용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구", 지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research) (16:1), pp. 21-54. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2015.16.1.002
  13. 천면중, 허명숙 2016. "구성원의 지식 심리적 주인의식과 지식공유 거부의도 간의 관계에 관한 실증연구: 구성원의 동기요인을 중심으로", 지식경영연구(Knowledge Management Research) (17:2), pp. 103-130. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2016.17.2.005
  14. Alice L. and Jean-Paul, L.F. 2010. "Knowledge Sharing in Organisational Contexts: a Motivation-Based Perspective", Journal of Knowledge Management (14:1), pp.51-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015561
  15. Anne-Mette L., and Ebba, H.H. 2011. "Knowledge-Sharing Enablers and Barriers in Pharmaceutical Research and Development", Journal of Knowledge Management (15:1), pp.53-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111108693
  16. Bart, V.D.H., and Jan A.de R. 2004. "Knowledge Sharing in Context: the Influence of Organizational Commitment, Communication Climate and CMC Use on Knowledge Sharing", Journal of Knowledge Management (8:6), pp.117-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675
  17. Floor S 2007. "Knowledge management among the older workforce", Journal of Knowledge Management (11:4), pp. 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710762738
  18. Gavrilova, Tatiana, and Tatiana Andreeva. 2012. "Knowledge elicitation techniques in a knowledge management context", Journal of Knowledge Management (16:4), pp.523-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211246112
  19. Hall M. 2006. "Knowledge management and the limits of knowledge codification", Journal of Knowledge Management (10:3), pp.117-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610670894
  20. Hau Y.S, Kim, B, Lee, H., and Kim Y.G, 2013. "The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees'tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions", International Journal of Information Management (33:2), pp. 356-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.009
  21. Li W. 2010. "Virtual knowledge sharing in a cross-cultural context", Journal of Knowledge Management (14:1), pp. 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015552
  22. Livio C 2010. "Knowledge-based Inter-Organizational Collaborations", Journal of Knowledge Management (14:3), pp. 348-358. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011050094
  23. Matayong, Sureena, and A hmad Kamil Mahmood. 2013. "The review of approaches to knowledge management system studies", Journal of Knowledge Management (17:3), pp.472-490. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2012-0316
  24. Meihami, B. and Hussein, M. 2014. "Knowledge Management a way to gain a competitive advantage in firms (evidence of manufacturing companies)", International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (14), pp.80-91.
  25. Perez L, Susana, Jose M.M.P., and Camilo J.V.O. 2004. "Managing knowledge: the link between culture and organizational learning", Journal of Knowledge Management (8:6), pp. 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567657
  26. Peter H.C. 2007. "Knowledge Sharing: Moving away from the Obsession with Best Practices", Journal of Knowledge Management (11:1), pp.36-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710728222
  27. Vilma V. and Jussi O. 2012. "Knowledge Sharing Motivational Factors of using an Intra-Orgranizational Social Media Platform", Journal of Knowledge Management (16:4), pp.592-603. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211246167
  28. Wang, Sheng, and Raymond A. Noe. 2010. "Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research", Human Resource Management Review (20:2), pp. 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
  29. Xin S., Tribe J. and Chamber D. 2013. "Conceptual Research in Tourism", Annals of Tourism Research (41), pp.66-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.12.003
  30. Zhang, L.L. and Hong, H.J. 2014. "Examining the Intellectual Structure of Reading Studies with Co-Word Analys is Based on the Importance of Journals and Sequence of Key words", Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (25:1), pp.295-318. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.295