DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multiple Regression Analysis for Piercing Punch Profile Optimization to Prevent Tearing During Tee Pipe Burring

다중 회귀 분석을 활용한 Tee-Pipe 버링 공정에서 찢어짐 방지를 위한 피어싱 펀치 형상 최적 설계

  • Received : 2017.01.25
  • Accepted : 2017.05.26
  • Published : 2017.10.01

Abstract

A tee is the most common pipefitting used to combine or divide fluid flow. Tees can connect pipes of different diameters or change the direction of a pipe run. To manufacture tee type of stainless steel pipe, combinations of punch piercing and burr forming have been widely used in the industry. However, such method is considerably time consuming with regard to performing empirical work necessary to attain process conditions to prevent upper end tearing of the tee product and meet target tee height. Numerous experiments have shown that the piercing profile is the main cause of defects mentioned above. Furthermore, the mold design is formed through trial and error according to pipe diameters and changes in requirements. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform piercing and burring process analysis via finite element analysis using DYNAFORM to resolve problems mentioned above. An optimization design method was used to determine the piercing punch profile. Three radii of the piercing punch (i.e., large, small, and joined radii) were selected as design variables to minimize thinning of a tee pipe. Based on results of correlation and multiple regression analyses, we developed a predictive approximation model to satisfy requirements for both thickness reduction and target height. The new piercing punch profile was then applied to actual tee forming using the developed prediction equation. Model results were found to be in good agreement with experimental results.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Gas Safety Corporation, 2015, Gas Statistics for 2015, http://www.kgs.or.kr/publish/Board.do?method=list&board_id=main_13.
  2. G. Liu, J. Peng, S. Yuan, B. Teng, K. Li, 2015, Analysis on Critical Conditions of Side Wall Wrinkling for Hydroforming of Thin-walled Tee-joint, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol. 97, pp. 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.06.004
  3. T. Teramae, K. Manabe, K. Ueno, K. Nakamura. H. Takeda, 2007, Effect of Material Properties on Deformation Behavior in Incremental Tube-burring Process using a Bar Tool, J. Mat. Process. Technol., Vol. 191, No. 1, pp. 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.039
  4. DYNAFORM-PC User's Manual, Version 1.0, 2011, Engineering Technology Associates Inc.
  5. A. Saungsai, Y. Otsuka, Y. Mutoh, 2014, Fretting Fatigue Behavior of SUS304 Stainless Steel Under Pressurized Hot Water, Tribol. Int., Vol. 79, pp. 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2014.05.023
  6. E. S. Kim, J. M. Lee, B. M. Kim, 2008, Selection of the Optimum Seaming Condition for Spin Drum Using Statistical Method, Kor. Precis. Eng. Soc., Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 99-107.
  7. R. H. Myers, 2009, Response Surface Methodology Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, Third Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, pp. 13-62.
  8. ATOS, GOM mbH, http://www.gom.com.