DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experience with Mechanical Circulatory Support for Medically Intractable Low Cardiac Output in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

  • Park, Jung Bin (Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwak, Jae Gun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lim, Hong-Gook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Han (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Ryul (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Yong Jin (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2016.06.20
  • Accepted : 2016.11.11
  • Published : 2017.07.31

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Mechanical circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist device has always been the optimal choice for treating the majority of medically intractable low cardiac output case. We retrospectively investigated our institution's outcomes and variables associated with a high risk of mortality. Subjects and Methods: From 1999 to 2014, 86 patients who were of pediatric age or had grown-up congenital heart disease underwent mechanical circulatory support for medically intractable low cardiac output in our pediatric intensive care unit. Of these, 9 grown-up congenital heart disease patients were over 18 years of age, and the median age of the subject group was 5.82 years (range: 1 day to 41.6 years). A review of all demographic, clinical, and surgical data and survival analysis were performed. Results: A total of 45 (52.3%) patients were successfully weaned from the mechanical assist device, and 25 (29.1%) survivors were able to be discharged. There was no significant difference in results between patients over 18 years and under 18 years of age. Risk factors for mortality were younger age (<30 days), functional single ventricle anatomy, support after cardiac operations, longer support duration, and deteriorated pre-ECMO status (severe metabolic acidosis and increased levels of lactate, creatinine, bilirubin, or liver enzyme). The survival rate has improved since 2010 (from 25% before 2010 to 35% after 2010), when we introduced an upgraded oxygenator, activated heart transplantation, and also began to apply ECMO before the end-stage of cardiac dysfunction, even though we could not reveal significant correlations between survival rate and changed strategies associated with ECMO. Conclusion: Mechanical circulatory support has played a critical role and has had a dramatic effect on survival in patients with medically intractable heart failure, particularly in recent years. Meticulous monitoring of acid-base status, laboratory findings, and early and liberal applications are recommended to improve outcomes without critical complication rates, particularly in neonates with single ventricle physiology.

Keywords

References

  1. Rossano JW, Jang GY. Pediatric heart failure: current state and future possibilities. Korean Circ J 2015;45:1-8. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2015.45.1.1
  2. Bakhtiary F, Keller H, Dogan S, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: clinical experiences in 45 adult patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:382-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.007
  3. Ko WJ, Lin CY, Chen RJ, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for adult postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:538-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03330-6
  4. Fuchs A, Netz H. Ventricular assist devices in pediatrics. Images Paediatr Cardiol 2001;3:24-54.
  5. Aharon AS, Drinkwater DC Jr, Churchwell KB, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children after repair of congenital cardiac lesions. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:2095-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03209-X
  6. Alsoufi B, Al-Radi OO, Gruenwald C, et al. Extra-corporeal life support following cardiac surgery in children: analysis of risk factors and survival in a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:1004-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.015
  7. del Nido PJ, Duncan BW, Mayer JE Jr, Wessel DL, LaPierre RA, Jonas RA. Left ventricular assist device improves survival in children with left ventricular dysfunction after repair of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:169-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(98)01309-5
  8. Kumar TK, Zurakowski D, Dalton H, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in postcardiotomy patients: factors influencing outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:330-6. e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.034
  9. del Nido PJ, Dalton HJ, Thompson AE, Siewers RD. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator rescue in children during cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. Circulation 1992;86(5 Suppl):II300-4.
  10. Duncan BW, Ibrahim AE, Hraska V, et al. Use of rapid-deployment extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the resuscitation of pediatric patients with heart disease after cardiac arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:305-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70131-X
  11. Greason KL, Hemp JR, Maxwell JM, Fetter JE, Moreno-Cabral RJ. Prevention of distal limb ischemia during cardiopulmonary support via femoral cannulation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:209-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(95)00380-0
  12. Morris MC, Ittenbach RF, Godinez RI, et al. Risk factors for mortality in 137 pediatric cardiac intensive care unit patients managed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1061-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000119425.04364.CF
  13. Doll N, Kiaii B, Borger M, et al. Five-year results of 219 consecutive patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postoperative cardiogenic shock. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:151-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01329-8
  14. Fuhrman BP, Hernan LJ, Rotta AT, Heard CM, Rosenkranz ER. Pathophysiology of cardiac extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs 1999;23:966-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06484.x
  15. Chow G, Koirala B, Armstrong D, et al. Predictors of mortality and neurological morbidity in children undergoing extracorporeal life support for cardiac disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:38-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.04.010
  16. Cengiz P, Seidel K, Rycus PT, Brogan TV, Roberts JS. Central nervous system complications during pediatric extracorporeal life support: incidence and risk factors. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2817-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000189940.70617.C3
  17. Kolovos NS, Bratton SL, Moler FW, et al. Outcome of pediatric patients treated with extracorporeal life support after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1435-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00898-1
  18. Polimenakos AC, Wojtyla P, Smith PJ, et al. Post-cardiotomy extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in neonates with complex single ventricle: analysis of outcomes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:1396-405.
  19. Lee J, Kim GB, Kwon HW, et al. Safety and efficacy of the off-label use of milrinone in pediatric patients with heart diseases. Korean Circ J 2014;44:320-7. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2014.44.5.320
  20. Montgomery VL, Strotman JM, Ross MP. Impact of multiple organ system dysfunction and nosocomial infections on survival of children treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after heart surgery. Crit Care Med 2000;28:526-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200002000-00040
  21. Osaki S, Edwards NM, Velez M, et al. Improved survival in patients with ventricular assist device therapy: the University of Wisconsin experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:281-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.023

Cited by

  1. Outcomes following venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children with refractory cardiogenic disease vol.178, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03352-5