Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is Carotid Artery Ultrasound Still Useful Method for Evaluation of Atherosclerosis?

  • Kim, Gee-Hee (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital) ;
  • Youn, Ho-Joong (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2016.06.13
  • Accepted : 2016.06.30
  • Published : 2017.01.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Carotid ultrasound is an imaging modality that allows non-invasive assessment of vascular anatomy and function. Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) has been shown to predict cardiovascular (CV) risk in multiple large studies. However, in 2013, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines designated that the carotid IMT as class III evidence level was not recommended for use in clinical practice as a routine measurement of risk assessment for a first atherosclerotic CV event. Following the announcement of this guideline, combined common carotid IMT and plaque, including plaque tissue characterization and plaque burden, using 3D ultrasound was reported to be better than either measurement alone in a variety of studies. Moreover, changes in the intima thickness were related to aging and early atherosclerosis, and remodeling of the media thickness was associated with hypertension. Separate measurement is useful for evaluating the effects of different atherosclerotic risk factors on the arterial wall; however, a more detailed and elaborate technique needs to be developed. If so, separate measurement will play an important role in the assessment of atherosclerosis and arterial wall change according to a variety of risk factors, such as metabolic syndrome. In addition, although carotid blood flow velocity is a useful tool for risk classification and prediction in clinical practice, further clinical research is needed. The value of carotid IMT by ultrasound examination for risk stratification remains controversial, and groups developing future guidelines should consider the roles of plaque presence and burden and hemodynamic parameters in additional risk stratification beyond carotid IMT in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Schmidt-Trucksass A, Grathwohl D, Schmid A, et al. Structural, functional, and hemodynamic changes of the common carotid artery with age in male subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:1091-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.19.4.1091
  2. Schoning M, Walter J, Scheel P. Estimation of cerebral blood flow through color duplex sonography of the carotid and vertebral arteries in healthy adults. Stroke 1994;25:17-22. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.25.1.17
  3. Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Oreste P, Paoletti R. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1986;74:1399-406. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.74.6.1399
  4. Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:93-111; quiz 89-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2007.11.011
  5. Howard G, Sharrett AR, Heiss G, et al. Carotid artery intimal-medial thickness distribution in general populations as evaluated by B-mode ultrasound. ARIC Investigators. Stroke 1993;24:1297-304. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.24.9.1297
  6. Polak JF, Pencina MJ, Pencina KM, O'Donnell CJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB Sr. Carotid-wall intima-media thickness and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2011;365:213-21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1012592
  7. van der Meer IM, Bots ML, Hofman A, del Sol AI, van der Kuip DA, Witteman JC. Predictive value of noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis for incident myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 2004;109:1089-94. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000120708.59903.1B
  8. Salonen JT, Salonen R. Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb 1991;11:1245-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.11.5.1245
  9. Naqvi TZ, Mendoza F, Rafii F, et al. High prevalence of ultrasound detected carotid atherosclerosis in subjects with low Framingham risk score: potential implications for screening for subclinical atherosclerosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:809-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.005
  10. Chuang SY, Bai CH, Cheng HM, et al. Common carotid artery enddiastolic velocity is independently associated with future cardiovascular events. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23:116-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487315571888
  11. Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2935-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005
  12. Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:1025-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.11.014
  13. Roman MJ, Naqvi TZ, Gardin JM, et al. Clinical application of noninvasive vascular ultrasound in cardiovascular risk stratification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:943-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2006.04.020
  14. del Sol AI, Moons KG, Hollander M, et al. Is carotid intima-media thickness useful in cardiovascular disease risk assessment? The Rotterdam Study. Stroke 2001;32:1532-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1532
  15. Kanters SD, Algra A, van Leeuwen MS, Banga JD. Reproducibility of in vivo carotid intima-media thickness measurements: a review. Stroke 1997;28:665-71. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.3.665
  16. Choi YS, Youn HJ, Youn JS, Park CS, Oh YS, Chung WS. Measurement of the intimal thickness of the carotid artery: comparison between 40 MHz ultrasound and histology in rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35:962-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.12.004
  17. Bae JH, Kim WS, Rihal CS, Lerman A. Individual measurement and significance of carotid intima, media, and intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasonographic image processing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006;26:2380-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000240420.36229.f9
  18. Gussenhoven EJ, Frietman PA, The SH, et al. Assessment of medial thinning in atherosclerosis by intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:1625-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90320-K
  19. Nakashima Y, Chen YX, Kinukawa N, Sueishi K. Distributions of diffuse intimal thickening in human arteries: preferential expression in atherosclerosis-prone arteries from an early age. Virchows Arch 2002;441:279-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-002-0605-1
  20. Won HK, Kim WS, Kim KY, Hyun DW, Kwon TG, Bae JH. Increased carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensive patients is caused by increased medial thickness. Korean J Med 2008;75:179-85.
  21. Kim JH, Youn HJ, Kim GH, Moon KW, Yoo KD, Kim CM. The clinical significance of separate measurements of carotid arterial wall to assess the risk factor for atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2016;24:48-54. https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.1.48
  22. Wikstrand J. Methodological considerations of ultrasound measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness and lumen diameter. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2007;27:341-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.2007.00757.x
  23. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke 1992;23:1752-60. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.23.12.1752
  24. Hlatky MA, Greenland P, Arnett DK, et al. Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009;119:2408-16. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192278
  25. Den Ruijter HM, Peters SA, Anderson TJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness measurements in cardiovascular risk prediction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2012;308:796-803. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.9630
  26. Inaba Y, Chen JA, Bergmann SR. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2012;220:128-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.06.044
  27. Peters SA, den Ruijter HM, Bots ML, Moons KG. Improvements in risk stratification for the occurrence of cardiovascular disease by imaging subclinical atherosclerosis: a systematic review. Heart 2012;98:177-84. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300747
  28. Nambi V, Chambless L, He M, et al. Common carotid artery intimamedia thickness is as good as carotid intima-media thickness of all carotid artery segments in improving prediction of coronary heart disease risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Eur Heart J 2012;33:183-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr192
  29. Kim G, Youn HJ, Choi YS, Jung HO, Chung WS, Kim CM. Is carotid artery evaluation necessary for primary prevention in asymptomatic high-risk patients without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease? Clin Interv Aging 2015;10:1111-9.
  30. Lee S, Cho GY, Kim HS, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness as a risk factor for outcomes in Asian patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Can J Cardiol 2014;30:1620-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.06.026
  31. Kim GH, Youn HJ, Choi YS, Jung HO, Chung WS, Kim CM. Carotid artery evaluation and coronary calcium score: which is better for the diagnosis and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease? Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:18591-600.
  32. Yu JS, Choi YS, Kim JY, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness is not related with clinical outcomes in young hypertensives. Clin Hypertens 2015;21:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-015-0021-x
  33. Azarpazhooh MR, Kazemi-Bajestani SM, Esmaeili H, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and nutritional intake are not associated with ultrasound-defined increased carotid intima media thickness in individuals without a history of cardiovascular events. Int J Prev Med 2014;5:1412-21.
  34. Thompson T, Shields KJ, Barinas-Mitchell E, Newman A, Sutton- Tyrrell K. Calcified carotid artery plaques predict cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly. J Hypertens 2015;33:810-7; discussion 817. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000488
  35. Prabhakaran S, Singh R, Zhou X, Ramas R, Sacco RL, Rundek T. Presence of calcified carotid plaque predicts vascular events: the Northern Manhattan Study. Atherosclerosis 2007;195:e197-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.03.044
  36. Nambi V, Chambless L, Folsom AR, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1600-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.075
  37. Peters SA, Dogan S, Meijer R, et al. The use of plaque score measurements to assess changes in atherosclerotic plaque burden induced by lipid-lowering therapy over time: the METEOR study. J Atheroscler Thromb 2011;18:784-95. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.8169
  38. Plichart M, Celermajer DS, Zureik M, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness in plaque-free site, carotid plaques and coronary heart disease risk prediction in older adults. The Three-City Study. Atherosclerosis 2011;219:917-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.09.024
  39. Kim JH, Youn HJ, Hong EJ, et al. Clinical significance of B-mode ultrasound of common carotid artery for prediction of severity of coronary artery disease: important parameters on hand measurement. Korean Circ J 2005;35:467-73. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2005.35.6.467
  40. Choi YS, Youn HJ, Chung WB, et al. Uptake of F-18 FDG and ultrasound analysis of carotid plaque. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:267-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9338-3
  41. Wahlgren CM, Zheng W, Shaalan W, Tang J, Bassiouny HS. Human carotid plaque calcification and vulnerability. Relationship between degree of plaque calcification, fibrous cap inflammatory gene expression and symptomatology. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27:193-200. https://doi.org/10.1159/000189204
  42. Wasserman BA, Sharrett AR, Lai S, et al. Risk factor associations with the presence of a lipid core in carotid plaque of asymptomatic individuals using high-resolution MRI: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Stroke 2008;39:329-35. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498634
  43. Lal BK, Hobson RW 2nd, Pappas PJ, et al. Pixel distribution analysis of B-mode ultrasound scan images predicts histologic features of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:1210-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.122888
  44. Sillesen H, Muntendam P, Adourian A, et al. Carotid plaque burden as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis: comparison with other tests for subclinical arterial disease in the High Risk Plaque BioImage study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:681-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.013
  45. Khalil A, Huffman MD, Prabhakaran D, et al. Predictors of carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque in young Indian adults: the New Delhi birth cohort. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:1322-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.03.180
  46. Vasan RS. Biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: molecular basis and practical considerations. Circulation 2006;113:2335-62. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.482570
  47. Cohen GI, Aboufakher R, Bess R, et al. Relationship between carotid disease on ultrasound and coronary disease on CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:1160-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.06.007
  48. Ikeda N, Kogame N, Iijima R, Nakamura M, Sugi K. Impact of carotid artery ultrasound and ankle-brachial index on prediction of severity of SYNTAX score. Circ J 2013;77:712-6. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1087
  49. Liang Y, Hou Y, Niu H, Lu M, Xue L, Sun Q. Correlation of highsensitivity C-reactive protein and carotid plaques with coronary artery disease in elderly patients. Exp Ther Med 2015;10:275-8. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2486
  50. Bai CH, Chen JR, Chiu HC, Pan WH. Lower blood flow velocity, higher resistance index, and larger diameter of extracranial carotid arteries are associated with ischemic stroke independently of carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors. J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35:322-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20351
  51. Chuang SY, Bai CH, Chen JR, et al. Common carotid end-diastolic velocity and intima-media thickness jointly predict ischemic stroke in Taiwan. Stroke 2011;42:1338-44. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605477
  52. Chung H, Jung YH, Kim KH, et al. Carotid artery end-diastolic velocity and future cerebro-cardiovascular events in asymptomatic high risk patients. Korean Circ J 2016;46:72-8. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.1.72

Cited by

  1. Lycopene and Vascular Health vol.9, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00521
  2. Association of Pre-Eclampsia with Carotid Artery Intima–Media Thickness and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease vol.7, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090275
  3. Combination of inductive effect of lipopolysaccharide and in situ mechanical conditioning for forming an autologous vascular graft in vivo vol.9, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47054-2
  4. Research progress in ultrasound use for the diagnosis and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases vol.74, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e715
  5. Role of pentraxin-3 in risk assessment of patients with metabolic syndrome vol.106, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.106.2019.18
  6. Role of pentraxin-3 in risk assessment of patients with metabolic syndrome vol.106, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.106.2019.18
  7. Serum Osteoprotegerin Level as a Risk Factor for Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: A Cross Sectional Study vol.14, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2246
  8. Serum Osteoprotegerin Level as a Risk Factor for Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: A Cross Sectional Study vol.14, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2246