DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal Factors of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Predicting Corticospinal Tract Injury in Patients with Brain Tumors

  • Min, Zhi-gang (Department of Radiology, Yixing Hospital Affiliated of Jiangsu University) ;
  • Niu, Chen (Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University) ;
  • Zhang, Qiu-li (Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University) ;
  • Zhang, Ming (Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University) ;
  • Qian, Yu-cheng (Department of Medical Imaging, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University)
  • Received : 2017.01.13
  • Accepted : 2017.04.04
  • Published : 2017.10.01

Abstract

Objective: To identify the optimal factors in diffusion tensor imaging for predicting corticospinal tract (CST) injury caused by brain tumors. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 33 patients with motor weakness and 64 patients with normal motor function. The movement of the CST, minimum distance between the CST and the tumor, and relative fractional anisotropy (rFA) of the CST on diffusion tensor imaging, were compared between patients with motor weakness and normal function. Logistic regression analysis was used to obtain the optimal factor predicting motor weakness. Results: In patients with motor weakness, the displacement ($8.44{\pm}6.64mm$) of the CST (p = 0.009), minimum distance ($3.98{\pm}7.49mm$) between the CST and tumor (p < 0.001), and rFA ($0.83{\pm}0.11$) of the CST (p < 0.001) were significantly different from those of the normal group ($4.64{\pm}6.65mm$, $14.87{\pm}12.04mm$, and $0.98{\pm}0.05$, respectively) (p = 0.009, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). The frequencies of patients with the CST passing through the tumor (6%, p = 0.002), CST close to the tumor (23%, p < 0.001), CST close to a malignant tumor (high grade glioma, metastasis, or lymphoma) (19%, p < 0.001), and CST passing through infiltrating edema (19%, p < 0.001) in the motor weakness group, were significantly different from those of the patients with normal motor function (0, 8, 1, and 10%, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that decreased rFA and CST close to a malignant tumor were effective variables related to motor weakness. Conclusion: Decreased fractional anisotropy, combined with closeness of a malignant tumor to the CST, is the optimal factor in predicting CST injury caused by a brain tumor.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China, Jiangsu University

References

  1. Dimou S, Battisti RA, Hermens DF, Lagopoulos J. A systematic review of functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging modalities used in presurgical planning of brain tumour resection. Neurosurg Rev 2013;36:205-214; discussion 214 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-012-0436-8
  2. Yu CS, Li KC, Xuan Y, Ji XM, Qin W. Diffusion tensor tractography in patients with cerebral tumors: a helpful technique for neurosurgical planning and postoperative assessment. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:197-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.04.010
  3. Itagiba VGA, Borges R, da Cruz Jr LCH, Furtado AD, Domingues RC, Gasparetto EL. Use of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of patterns of white matter involvement in patients with brain tumors: is it useful in the differential diagnosis? Radiol Bras 2010;43:362-368 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842010000600006
  4. Laundre BJ, Jellison BJ, Badie B, Alexander AL, Field AS. Diffusion tensor imaging of the corticospinal tract before and after mass resection as correlated with clinical motor findings: preliminary data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:791-796
  5. Kovanlikaya I, Firat Z, Kovanlikaya A, Ulug AM, Cihangiroglu MM, John M, et al. Assessment of the corticospinal tract alterations before and after resection of brainstem lesions using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and tractography at 3T. Eur J Radiol 2011;77:383-391 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.012
  6. Min ZG, Rana N, Niu C, Ji HM, Zhang M. Does diffusion tensor tractography of the corticospinal tract correctly reflect motor function? Med Princ Pract 2014;23:174-176 https://doi.org/10.1159/000353463
  7. Kwon YH, Son SM, Lee J, Bai DS, Jang SH. Combined study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor tractography for prediction of motor outcome in patients with corona radiata infarct. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:430-434 https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0793
  8. Kim CH, Chung CK, Kim JS, Jahng TA, Lee JH, Song IC. Use of diffusion tensor imaging to evaluate weakness. J Neurosurg 2007;106:111-118 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2007.106.1.111
  9. Morita N, Wang S, Kadakia P, Chawla S, Poptani H, Melhem ER. Diffusion tensor imaging of the corticospinal tract in patients with brain neoplasms. Magn Reson Med Sci 2011;10:239-243 https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.10.239
  10. Stadlbauer A, Nimsky C, Gruber S, Moser E, Hammen T, Engelhorn T, et al. Changes in fiber integrity, diffusivity, and metabolism of the pyramidal tract adjacent to gliomas: a quantitative diffusion tensor fiber tracking and MR spectroscopic imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:462-469
  11. Puig J, Pedraza S, Blasco G, Daunis-I-Estadella J, Prats A, Prados F, et al. Wallerian degeneration in the corticospinal tract evaluated by diffusion tensor imaging correlates with motor deficit 30 days after middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1324-1330 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2038
  12. De Belder FE, Oot AR, Van Hecke W, Venstermans C, Menovsky T, Van Marck V, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging provides an insight into the microstructure of meningiomas, high-grade gliomas, and peritumoral edema. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36:577-582 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318261e913
  13. Kim MS, Chung CK, Jung HW, Park CK, Kim CH, Kim JS. Preoperative weakness and demyelination of the corticospinal tract in meningioma patients: changes in diffusion parameters using diffusion tensor imaging. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2014;55:267-272 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.55.5.267
  14. Cuthbert SC, Goodheart GJ Jr. On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review. Chiropr Osteopat 2007;15:4 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-4
  15. Kim M, Kim HS. Emerging techniques in brain tumor imaging: what radiologists need to know. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:598-619 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.598
  16. Berman JI, Berger MS, Mukherjee P, Henry RG. Diffusiontensor imaging-guided tracking of fibers of the pyramidal tract combined with intraoperative cortical stimulation mapping in patients with gliomas. J Neurosurg 2004;101:66-72 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0066
  17. Hendler T, Pianka P, Sigal M, Kafri M, Ben-Bashat D, Constantini S, et al. Delineating gray and white matter involvement in brain lesions: three-dimensional alignment of functional magnetic resonance and diffusion-tensor imaging. J Neurosurg 2003;99:1018-1027 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.99.6.1018
  18. Mori S, Frederiksen K, van Zijl PC, Stieltjes B, Kraut MA, Solaiyappan M, et al. Brain white matter anatomy of tumor patients evaluated with diffusion tensor imaging. Ann Neurol 2002;51:377-380 https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10137
  19. Clark CA, Barrick TR, Murphy MM, Bell BA. White matter fiber tracking in patients with space-occupying lesions of the brain: a new technique for neurosurgical planning? Neuroimage 2003;20:1601-1608 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.022
  20. Yamada K, Kizu O, Mori S, Ito H, Nakamura H, Yuen S, et al. Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:295-301 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2271020313
  21. Bagadia A, Purandare H, Misra BK, Gupta S. Application of magnetic resonance tractography in the perioperative planning of patients with eloquent region intra-axial brain lesions. J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:633-639 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.08.026
  22. Mathias J, Koessler L, Brissart H, Foscolo S, Schmitt E, Bracard S, et al. Giant cystic widening of Virchow-Robin spaces: an anatomofunctional study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1523-1525 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0622
  23. Young RJ, Lee V, Peck KK, Sierra T, Zhang Z, Jacks LM, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the corticospinal tract in the presence of enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces. J Neuroimaging 2014;24:79-82 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00661.x
  24. Ng WH, Cheong DL, Khu KJ, Venkatesh G, Ng YK, Lim CC. Diffusion tensor tractography: corticospinal tract fiber reduction is associated with temporary hemiparesis in benign extracerebral lesions. Neurosurgery 2008;63:452-458; discussion 458-459
  25. Yamahara T, Numa Y, Oishi T, Kawaguchi T, Seno T, Asai A, et al. Morphological and flow cytometric analysis of cell infiltration in glioblastoma: a comparison of autopsy brain and neuroimaging. Brain Tumor Pathol 2010;27:81-87 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-010-0275-7
  26. Goebell E, Paustenbach S, Vaeterlein O, Ding XQ, Heese O, Fiehler J, et al. Low-grade and anaplastic gliomas: differences in architecture evaluated with diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology 2006;239:217-222 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2383050059
  27. Schluter M, Stieltjes B, Hahn HK, Rexilius J, Konrad-verse O, Peitgen HO. Detection of tumour infiltration in axonal fibre bundles using diffusion tensor imaging. Int J Med Robot 2005;1:80-86
  28. Reich DS, Smith SA, Jones CK, Zackowski KM, van Zijl PC, Calabresi PA, et al. Quantitative characterization of the corticospinal tract at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:2168-2178
  29. Yamada K, Kizu O, Kubota T, Ito H, Matsushima S, Oouchi H, et al. The pyramidal tract has a predictable course through the centrum semiovale: a diffusion-tensor based tractography study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:519-524 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21006
  30. Stadlbauer A, Nimsky C, Buslei R, Salomonowitz E, Hammen T, Buchfelder M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and optimized fiber tracking in glioma patients: histopathologic evaluation of tumor-invaded white matter structures. Neuroimage 2007;34:949-956 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.051
  31. Bae MS, Jahng GH, Ryu CW, Kim EJ, Choi WS, Yang DM. Effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion tensor MR imaging for the evaluation of brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2009;51:793-802 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0571-2
  32. Zolal A, Sames M, Burian M, Novakova M, Malucelli A, Hejcl A, et al. The effect of a gadolinium-based contrast agent on diffusion tensor imaging. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1877-1882 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.074

Cited by

  1. Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals vol.19, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1172
  2. A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology vol.20, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0928
  3. Assessment of Glioblastoma Response in the Era of Bevacizumab: Longstanding and Emergent Challenges in the Imaging Evaluation of Pseudoresponse vol.10, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00460
  4. Laplacian-Regularized Mean Apparent Propagator-MRI in Evaluating Corticospinal Tract Injury in Patients with Brain Glioma vol.22, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0949
  5. Automated facial–vestibulocochlear nerve complex identification based on data‐driven tractography clustering vol.34, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4607