Acknowledgement
Supported by : Ministry of Health & Welfare
References
- Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137(5 Part 1):347-360 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_Part_1-200209030-00012
- Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, Ernster VL, Rosenberg RD, Carney PA, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1001-1008 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308451
- Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, et al. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology 2009;253:641-651 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2533082308
- Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Brenner RJ, Feig SA, et al. Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology 2010;255:354-361 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091636
- Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:168-175 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
- Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, Sickles EA, Lehman CD, Geller BM, et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006;241:55-66 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2411051504
- Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276:33-38 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540010035027
- Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, Geller B, Dittus K, Braithwaite D, et al. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:807-816 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.307
- Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 2002;224:861-869 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2243011482
- Suh M, Choi KS, Park B, Lee YY, Jun JK, Lee DH, et al. Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results of the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2013. Cancer Res Treat 2016;48:1-10 https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.204
- Lee EH, Kim KW, Kim YJ, Shin DR, Park YM, Lim HS, et al. Performance of screening mammography: a report of the alliance for breast cancer screening in Korea. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:489-496 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.489
- Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165-175 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2251011667
- Laya MB, Larson EB, Taplin SH, White E. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:643-649 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/88.10.643
-
D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, Feig SA, Jackson VP, Kopans DB, et al. BI-RADS: mammography. In: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, eds.
$BIRADS^{(R)}$ breast imaging reporting and data system: breast imaging atlas, 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003 - Park SK, Kang D, Kim Y, Yoo KY. Epidemiologic characteristics of the breast cancer in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2009;52:937-945 https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2009.52.10.937
- Murphy IG, Dillon MF, Doherty AO, McDermott EW, Kelly G, O'Higgins N, et al. Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2007;96:457-463 https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20801
- Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screendetected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-1087 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081
- Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, Lee J, Toth H. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:W292-W295 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7594
- Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH, Duffy SW, Smart CR, Gad A, et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial. Cancer 1995;75:2507-2517 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950515)75:10<2507::AID-CNCR2820751017>3.0.CO;2-H
- Brekelmans CT, Collette HJ, Collette C, Fracheboud J, de Waard F. Breast cancer after a negative screen: follow-up of women participating in the DOM Screening Programme. Eur J Cancer 1992;28A:893-895
- Suzuki A, Kuriyama S, Kawai M, Amari M, Takeda M, Ishida T, et al. Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry. Cancer Sci 2008;99:2264-2267 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00926.x
- Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:227-236 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa062790
- Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004;230:29-41 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2301020870
- Roelofs AA, Karssemeijer N, Wedekind N, Beck C, van Woudenberg S, Snoeren PR, et al. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 2007;242:70-77 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2421050684
- Wang WL, Hsu SD, Wang JH, Huang LC, Hsu WL. Survey of breast cancer mammography screening behaviors in Eastern Taiwan based on a health belief model. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2014;30:422-427 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2014.04.007
- Moodi M, Rezaeian M, Mostafavi F, Sharifirad GR. Determinants of mammography screening behavior in Iranian women: a population-based study. J Res Med Sci 2012;17:750-759
- Juon HS, Kim M, Shankar S, Han W. Predictors of adherence to screening mammography among Korean American women. Prev Med 2004;39:474-481 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.006
- Kim SA, Chang JM, Cho N, Yi A, Moon WK. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:229-238 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.229
Cited by
- Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals vol.19, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1172
- Effect of Different Types of Mammography Equipment on Screening Outcomes: A Report by the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea vol.20, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0006
- Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets vol.20, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0193
- Five-Year Overall Survival of Interval Breast Cancers is Better than Non- Interval Cancers from Korean Breast Cancer Registry vol.20, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2019.20.6.1717
- Prevalence of Women with Dense Breasts in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Cross-sectional Study vol.51, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.297
- Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts vol.21, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0176
- Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in reducing breast cancer mortality vol.7, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00295-9