DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ruptured Corpus Luteal Cyst: Prediction of Clinical Outcomes with CT

  • Lee, Myoung Seok (Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Min Hoan (Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Woo, Hyunsik (Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sung, Chang Kyu (Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeon, Hye Won (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Taek Sang (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.10.19
  • Accepted : 2017.01.04
  • Published : 2017.08.01

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the determinant pretreatment CT findings that can predict surgical intervention for patients suffering from corpus luteal cyst rupture with hemoperitoneum. Materials and Methods: From January 2009 to December 2014, a total of 106 female patients (mean age, 26.1 years; range, 17-44 years) who visited the emergency room of our institute for acute abdominal pain and were subsequently diagnosed with ruptured corpus luteal cyst with hemoperitoneum were included in the retrospective study. The analysis of CT findings included cyst size, cyst shape, sentinel clot sign, ring of fire sign, hemoperitoneum depth, active bleeding in portal phase and attenuation of hemoperitoneum. The comparison of CT findings between the surgery and conservative management groups was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square test. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant CT findings in predicting surgical intervention for a ruptured cyst. Results: Comparative analysis revealed that the presence of active bleeding and the hemoperitoneum depth were significantly different between the surgery and conservative management groups and were confirmed as significant CT findings for predicting surgery, with adjusted odds ratio (ORs) of 3.773 and 1.318, respectively (p < 0.01). On the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for hemoperitoneum depth, the optimal cut-off value was 5.8 cm with 73.7% sensitivity and 58.6% specificity (Az = 0.711, p = 0.004). In cases with a hemoperitoneum depth > 5.8 cm and concurrent active bleeding, the OR for surgery increased to 5.786. Conclusion: The presence of active bleeding and the hemoperitoneum depth on a pretreatment CT scan can be predictive warning signs of surgery for a patient with a ruptured corpus luteal cyst with hemoperitoneum.

Keywords

References

  1. Teng SW, Tseng JY, Chang CK, Li CT, Chen YJ, Wang PH. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing hemodynamically stable patients with ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:474-477 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60147-8
  2. Raziel A, Ron-El R, Pansky M, Arieli S, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Current management of ruptured corpus luteum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;50:77-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(93)90168-C
  3. Bottomley C, Bourne T. Diagnosis and management of ovarian cyst accidents. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:711-724 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.02.001
  4. Ho WK, Wang YF, Wu HH, Tsai HD, Chen TH, Chen M. Ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum: case characteristics and demographic changes over time. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2009;48:108-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60267-9
  5. Kim JH, Lee SM, Lee JH, Jo YR, Moon MH, Shin J, et al. Successful conservative management of ruptured ovarian cysts with hemoperitoneum in healthy women. PLoS One 2014;9:e91171 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091171
  6. Choi HJ, Kim SH, Kim SH, Kim HC, Park CM, Lee HJ, et al. Ruptured corpus luteal cyst: CT findings. Korean J Radiol 2003;4:42-45 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2003.4.1.42
  7. Reynolds T, Hill MC, Glassman LM. Sonography of hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. J Clin Ultrasound 1986;14:449-453 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870140608
  8. Orwig D, Federle MP. Localized clotted blood as evidence of visceral trauma on CT: the sentinel clot sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:747-749 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.153.4.747
  9. Borders RJ, Breiman RS, Yeh BM, Qayyum A, Coakley FV. Computed tomography of corpus luteal cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:340-342 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200405000-00006
  10. Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Paulson EK. Ovarian cyst rupture causing hemoperitoneum: imaging features and the potential for misdiagnosis. Abdom Imaging 1999;24:304-308 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900502
  11. Mohamed M, Al-Ramahi G, McCann M. Postcoital hemoperitoneum caused by ruptured corpus luteal cyst: a hidden etiology. J Surg Case Rep 2015 Oct 1 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjv120
  12. Wilbur AC, Goldstein LD, Prywitch BA. Hemorrhagic ovarian cysts in patients on anticoagulation therapy: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:623-625 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199307000-00020
  13. Boscak AR, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Fleiter TR, Miller LA, Sliker CW, et al. Optimizing trauma multidetector CT protocol for blunt splenic injury: need for arterial and portal venous phase scans. Radiology 2013;268:79-88 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121370

Cited by

  1. Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals vol.19, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1172
  2. Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage vol.11, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-017-0374-8
  3. Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis—part I: corpus luteum and haemorrhagic ovarian cysts, genital causes of haemoperitoneum vol.10, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0808-5
  4. Hemorrhagic corpus luteum: Clinical management update vol.17, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2020.40359
  5. Identifying corpus luteum rupture as the culprit for haemoperitoneum vol.94, pp.1117, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200383
  6. Non-traumatic hemoperitoneum in the ED setting: causes, characteristics, prevalence and sex differences vol.46, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02699-w