DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Steady-State Free Precession in Differential Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Benign Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Comparison to Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar Imaging

  • Shin, Jae Ho (Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Medical College) ;
  • Jeong, Soh Yong (Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Medical College) ;
  • Lim, Jung Hyun (Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Medical College) ;
  • Park, Jeongmi (Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Medical College)
  • Received : 2017.04.26
  • Accepted : 2017.07.20
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted steady-state free precession (DW-SSFP) in comparison to diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging (DW-EPI) for differentiating the neoplastic and benign osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 40 patients with recent vertebral compression fractures but no history of vertebroplasty, spine operation, or chemotherapy. They had received 3-Tesla (T) spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including both DW-SSFP and DW-EPI sequences. The 40 patients included 20 with neoplastic vertebral fracture and 20 with benign osteoporotic vertebral fracture. In each fracture lesion, we obtained the signal intensity normalized by the signal intensity of normal bone marrow (SI norm) on DW-SSFP and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on DW-EPI. The correlation between the SI norm and the ADC in each lesion was analyzed using linear regression. The optimal cut-off values for the diagnosis of neoplastic fracture were determined in each sequence using Youden's J statistics and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Results: In the neoplastic fracture, the median SI norm on DW-SSFP was higher and the median ADC on DW-EPI was lower than the benign osteoporotic fracture (5.24 vs. 1.30, P = 0.032, and 0.86 vs. 1.48, P = 0.041, respectively). Inverse linear correlations were evident between SI norm and ADC in both neoplastic and benign osteoporotic fractures (r = -0.45 and -0.61, respectively). The optimal cut-off values for diagnosis of neoplastic fracture were SI norm of 3.0 in DW-SSFP with the sensitivity and specificity of 90.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.0-99.0) and 95.3% (95% CI: 90.0-100.0), respectively, and ADC of 1.3 in DW-EPI with the sensitivity and specificity of 90.5% (95% CI: 80.0-100.0) and 70.4% (95% CI: 60.0-80.0), respectively. Conclusion: In 3-T MRI, DW-SSFP has comparable sensitivity and specificity to DW-EPI in differentiating the neoplastic vertebral fracture from the benign osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Keywords

References

  1. Kaloostian PE, Yurter A, Zadnik PL, Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL. Current paradigms for metastatic spinal disease: an evidence-based review. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:248-262 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3324-8
  2. An HS, Andreshak TG, Nguyen C, Williams A, Daniels D. Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1776-1782 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199508150-00005
  3. Uetani M, Hashmi R, Hayashi K. Malignant and benign compression fractures: differentiation and diagnostic pitfalls on MRI. Clin Radiol 2004;59:124-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2003.07.005
  4. Bhugaloo A, Abdullah B, Siow Y, Ng Kh. Diffusion weighted MR imaging in acute vertebral compression fractures: differentiation between malignant and benign causes. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2006;2:e12
  5. Jung HS, Jee WH, McCauley TR, Ha KY, Choi KH. Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging. Radiographics 2003;23:179-187 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.231025043
  6. Ho CS, Choi WM, Chen CY, Chen WY, Chan WP. Metastasis in vertebra mimicking acute compression fractures in a patient with osteoporosis: MRI findings. Clin Imaging 2005;29:64-67
  7. Le Bihan DJ. Differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: a closer step toward the "holy grail" of tissue characterization? Radiology 1998;207:305-307 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577472
  8. Shih TT, Huang KM, Li YW. Solitary vertebral collapse: distinction between benign and malignant causes using MR patterns. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:635-642 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199905)9:5<635::AID-JMRI4>3.0.CO;2-E
  9. Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, Fisher LL. Diffusionweighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:948-953
  10. Baur A, Huber A, Ertl-Wagner B, et al. Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steadystate free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:366-372
  11. The Asian Audit: Epidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in Asia 2009. International Osteoporosis Foundation web site. http://www.iofbonehealth.org/. Published September 2009. Accessed March 18, 2017
  12. Park SH, Han PK, Choi SH. Physiological and functional magnetic resonance imaging using balanced steady-state free precession. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:550-559 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.550
  13. Geith T, Schmidt G, Biffar A, et al. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:1083-1092 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8010
  14. Biffar A, Baur-Melnyk A, Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Dietrich O. Quantitative analysis of the diffusion-weighted steadystate free precession signal in vertebral bone marrow lesions. Invest Radiol 2011;46:601-609 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821e637d
  15. Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Jankharia BG, Cheng HL, Shroff MM. Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2008;28:1147-1160 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.284075031
  16. Thawait SK, Marcus MA, Morrison WB, Klufas RA, Eng J, Carrino JA. Research synthesis: what is the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E736-744 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182458cac