DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Selection of Tasks for Assessment of Pharmacy Clinical Performance in Korean Pharmacist Licensure Examination: Results of an Expert Survey

약사국가고시 실기시험 영역 선별을 위한 전문가 조사

  • Han, Nayoung (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Yeun (College of Pharmacy, Hanyang University) ;
  • Gwak, Hye Sun (College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Byung Koo (College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Young Sook (College of Pharmacy, Keimyung University) ;
  • Lee, Sukhyang (College of Pharmacy, Ajou University) ;
  • Yong, Chul-Soon (College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kim, Joo Hee (College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Oh, Jung Mi (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 한나영 (서울대학교 약학대학 종합약학연구소) ;
  • 이주연 (한양대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 곽혜선 (이화여자대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 이병구 (이화여자대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 이영숙 (계명대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 이숙향 (아주대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 용철순 (영남대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 김주희 (이화여자대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 오정미 (서울대학교 약학대학 종합약학연구소)
  • Received : 2017.08.03
  • Accepted : 2017.09.22
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

Background: As the demands of pharmacist's role and quality performance have increased, the verification of pharmacist's ability has been required. In this study, we aimed to select appropriate items for assessment of pharmacist's knowledge, attitude and performance. Methods: Based on the pharmacist job analysis, we selected duties and tasks in consideration of applying pharmacy practical examination through brainstorming of internal researchers and group discussion with experts. Survey was conducted to evaluate the tasks according to the criteria detailed below: Realistic, Understandable, Measurable, Behavioral and Achievable (RUMBA). The subjects included professors at colleges of pharmacy and instructors of institutional or community pharmacy settings. Results: Nine duties including 41 tasks were drawn for the survey through primary internal researchers. Of the 90 respondents, 95.6% were professors or preceptors who was engaged in practical training, and 62.2% had more than five years of practical experience. As a result of survey and discussion with expert panel, selected seven duties were selected as followings: 'Patient (customer) reception', 'Drug preparation and distribution', 'Patient care', 'Administration', 'Patient counseling', 'Non-prescription medication counseling', and 'Provision of drug information'. The final 20 tasks from seven duties were chosen to assess skills that a pharmacist should be able to perform. Conclusion: This is the first study to select the items that can be included in pharmacist practical examination in the future, based on the RUMBA criteria. As a next step, it is necessary to study how to implement these items.

Keywords

References

  1. Principles of Practice for Pharmaceutical Care. American Pharmacists Association. Available from www.pharmacist.com/principles-practice-pharmaceutical-care. Accessed July 17, 2017.
  2. Jouan A, Coulibaly I, Adam F, et al. Analytical study of a Rift Valley fever epidemic. Res Virol 1989;140:175-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-2516(89)80096-2
  3. Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990;47:533-43.
  4. Kim MS. Adoption of Clinical Skills Examination: the Challenge of National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board. Korean J Med Educ 2009;21(3):215-6. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2009.21.3.215
  5. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Introducion of practical examinations to the national examination of dentists since 2021. 2017.
  6. Oh GS. A study of globalization for Korean nurse license examination. Institution of Health Policy in Yonsei University 2006.
  7. Sturpe DA. Objective structured clinical examinations in doctor of pharmacy programs in the United States. Am J Pharm Educ 2010;74(8) Article 148.
  8. Austin Z, O'Byrne C, Pugsley J, Munoz LQ. Development and validation processes for an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for entry-to-practice certification in pharmacy: The Canadian experience. Am J Pharm Educ 2003;67(3) Article 76.
  9. Kang M. Comparison of Pharmacy Practice Experience in Pharmacy School between Korea and Canada. Korean J Clin Pharm 2015;25:68-73.
  10. Tokunaga J, Takamura N, Ogata K, et al. An advanced objective structured clinical examination using patient simulators to evaluate pharmacy students' skills in physical assessment. Am J Pharm Educ 2014;78(10) Article 184.
  11. Sosabowski MH, Gard PR. Pharmacy education in the United Kingdom. Am J Pharm Educ 2008;72(6) Article 130.
  12. Kubota Y, Yano Y, Seki S, et al. Assessment of pharmacy students' communication competence using the Roter Interaction Analysis System during objective structured clinical examinations. Am J Pharm Educ 2011;75(3) Article 43.
  13. Pharmacist Evaluating Examinatin. The Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada. Available from www.pebc.ca. Accessed June 29, 2017.
  14. Austin Z, Gregory P, Tabak D. Simulated patients vs. standardized patients in objective structured clinical examinations. Am J Pharm Educ 2006;70(5) Article 119.
  15. Kim JH, Lee JY, Lee YS, et al. Attitudes to proposed assessment of pharmacy skills in Korean pharmacist licensure examination. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2017;14:6. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.6
  16. Chung KH, Lee BK, Lee EK, et al. The second job analysis of Korean pharmacists. Seoul: National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board, 2014.
  17. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990;65:S63-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045
  18. Jorgenson D, Dalton D, Farrell B, Tsuyuki RT, Dolovich L. Guidelines for pharmacists integrating into primary care teams. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2013;146:342-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1715163513504528
  19. Ketelaars CA. Using the RUMBA requirements in developing criteria. Nurs Qual Connect 1994;4:7.
  20. Alkhawajah AM, Eferakeya AE. The role of pharmacists in patients' education on medication. Public Health 1992;106:231-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80541-4
  21. Donihi AC, Weber RJ, Sirio CA, Mark SM, Meyer SM. An advanced pharmacy practice experience in inpatient medication education. Am J Pharm Educ 2009;73(1) Article 11.
  22. Yoon JH, Suh HS, Je NK. The students' evaluation of practice sites and preceptors in pharmacy experiential education. Korean J Clin Pharm 2017;27:69-76. https://doi.org/10.24304/kjcp.2017.27.2.69
  23. Hwang K, Lee YM, Baik SH. Clinical performance assessment as a model of Korean medical licensure examination. Korean J Med Educ 2001;13:277-87.
  24. Sefton AJ. New approaches to medical education: an international perspective. Med Princ Pract 2004;13:239-48. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079521
  25. Medina MS, Plaza CM, Stowe CD, et al. Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ 2013;77(8) Article 162.

Cited by

  1. 약학대학 실기시험 문항개발에 대한 제언 vol.30, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.24304/kjcp.2020.30.2.127