참고문헌
- Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66: 506-577. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002
- Lee H, Hamid S, Zain S. 2014. Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to nanocellulose: structure and chemical process. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014: 631013.
- Himmel ME, Ding S-Y, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, et al. 2007. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315: 804-807. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137016
- Gallezot P. 2012. Conversion of biomass to selected chemical products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41: 1538-1558. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CS15147A
- Kato DM, Elia N, Flythe M, Lynn BC. 2014. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass using Fenton chemistry. Bioresour. Technol. 162: 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.151
- Iqbal HMN, Kyazze G, Keshavarz T. 2013. Advances in the valorization of lignocellulosic materials by biotechnology: an overview. BioResources 8: 3157-3176.
- Mhuantong W, Charoensawan V, Kanokratana P, Tangphatsornruang S, Champreda V. 2015. Comparative analysis of sugarcane bagasse metagenome reveals unique and conserved biomass-degrading enzymes among lignocellulolytic microbial communities. Biotechnol. Biofuels 8: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0200-8
- Kanokratana P, Uengwetwanit T, Rattanachomsri U, Bunterngsook B, Nimchua T, Tangphatsornruang S, et al. 2011. Insights into the phylogeny and metabolic potential of a primary tropical peat swamp forest microbial community by metagenomic analysis. Microb. Ecol. 61: 518-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9766-7
- Woo HL, Hazen TC, Simmons BA, DeAngelis KM. 2014. Enzyme activities of aerobic lignocellulolytic bacteria isolated from wet tropical forest soils. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 37: 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2013.10.001
- Aylward FO, Burnum KE, Scott JJ, Suen G, Tringe SG, Adams SM, et al. 2012. Metagenomic and metaproteomic insights into bacterial communities in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens. ISME J. 6: 1688-1701. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.10
- Scully ED, Geib SM, Hoover K, Tien M, Tringe SG, Barry KW, et al. 2013. Metagenomic profiling reveals lignocellulose degrading system in a microbial community associated with a wood-feeding beetle. PLoS One 8: e73827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073827
- Metzker ML. 2010. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genetics 11: 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2626
- Roberts RJ, Carneiro MO, Schatz MC. 2013. The advantages of SMRT sequencing. Genome Biol. 14: 405. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-405
- Qin W. 2016. Recent developments in using advanced sequencing technologies for the genomic studies of lignin and cellulose degrading microorganisms. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 12: 156. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.13537
- Kim DS, Lee JH, Yang SH. 2010. Plant Community Dynamics, pp. 107-135.
- Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. 2012. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6: 1621-1624. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.8
- Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7: 335-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
- Eren AM, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. 2013. A filtering method to generate high quality short reads using Illumina paired-end technology. PLoS One 8: e66643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066643
- Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460-2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
- Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, et al. 2009. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: D141-D145. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn879
- Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R. 2010. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26: 266-267. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636
- Sakai H, Naito K, Ogiso-Tanaka E, Takahashi Y, Iseki K, Muto C, et al. 2015. The power of single molecule real-time sequencing technology in the de novo assembly of a eukaryotic genome. Sci. Rep. 5: 16780. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16780
- Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30: 2068-2069. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153
- Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-119
- Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
- Li P-E, Lo C-C, Anderson JJ, Davenport KW, Bishop-Lilly KA, Xu Y, et al. 2017. Enabling the democratization of the genomics revolution with a fully integrated Web-based bioinformatics platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 45: 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1027
- Li H, Durbin R. 2010. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26: 589-595. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698
- O'Leary N A, W right MW, Brister JR, C iufo S , Haddad D , McVeigh R, et al. 2016. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44: D733-D745. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1189
- Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. 2009. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: D233-D238. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn663
- Lombard V, Ramulu HG, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. 2014. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: D490-D495. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1178
- Park BH, Karpinets TV, Syed MH, Leuze MR, Uberbacher EC. 2010. CAZymes Analysis Toolkit (CAT): Web service for searching and analyzing carbohydrate-active enzymes in a newly sequenced organism using CAZy database. Glycobiology 20: 1574-1584. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwq106
- Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, et al. 2016. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 44: D279-D285. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1344
- Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9: 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
- Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, et al. 2016. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 44: D286-D293. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1248
- Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. 2016. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 428: 726-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006
- Konietzny SG, Pope PB, Weimann A, McHardy AC. 2014. Inference of phenotype-defining functional modules of protein families for microbial plant biomass degraders. Biotechnol. Biofuels 7: 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-014-0124-8
- Zhu D, Zhang P, Xie C, Zhang W, Sun J, Qian WJ, Yang B. 2017. Biodegradation of alkaline lignin by Bacillus ligniniphilus L1. Biotechnol. Biofuels 10: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0735-y
- Zhang J, Presley GN, Hammel KE, Ryu JS, Menke JR, Figueroa M, et al. 2016. Localizing gene regulation reveals a staggered wood decay mechanism for the brown rot fungus Postia placenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: 10968-10973. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608454113
- Horn SJ, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Eijsink VG. 2012. Novel enzymes for the degradation of cellulose. Biotechnol. Biofuels 5: 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-45
- Kameshwar AKS, Qin WS. 2016. Recent developments in using advanced sequencing technologies for the genomic studies of lignin and cellulose degrading microorganisms. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 12: 156-171. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.13537
- Han S-I. 2016. Phylogenetic characteristics of bacterial populations and isolation of aromatic compounds utilizing bacteria from humus layer of oak forest. Korean J. Microbiol. 52: 175-182. https://doi.org/10.7845/kjm.2016.6028
- Jimenez DJ, de Lima Brossi MJ, Schuckel J, Kracun SK, Willats WG, van Elsas JD. 2016. Characterization of three plant biomass-degrading microbial consortia by metagenomicsand metasecretomics-based approaches. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100: 10463-10477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7713-3
- Folman LB, Klein Gunnewiek PJ, Boddy L, de Boer W. 2008. Impact of white-rot fungi on numbers and community composition of bacteria colonizing beech wood from forest soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 63: 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00425.x
- Lacerda J unior G V, N oronha M F, d e Sousa ST, Cabral L , Domingos DF, Saber ML, et al. 2017. Potential of semiarid soil from Caatinga biome as a novel source for mining lignocellulose-degrading enzymes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93: fiw248. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw248
- Kim Y, Liesack W. 2015. Differential assemblage of functional units in paddy soil microbiomes. PLoS One 10: e0122221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122221
- Cragg SM, Beckham GT, Bruce NC, Bugg TD, Distel DL, Dupree P, et al. 2015. Lignocellulose degradation mechanisms across the Tree of Life. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 29: 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.018
- Wang C, Dong D, Wang H, Muller K, Qin Y, Wang H, et al. 2016. Metagenomic analysis of microbial consortia enriched from compost: new insights into the role of Actinobacteria in lignocellulose decomposition. Biotechnol. Biofuels 9: 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0440-2
- Warnecke F, Luginbühl P, Ivanova N, Ghassemian M, Richardson TH, Stege JT, et al. 2007. Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature 450: 560-565. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06269
- Lopez-Mondejar R, Zuhlke D, Becher D, Riedel K, Baldrian P. 2016. Cellulose and hemicellulose decomposition by forest soil bacteria proceeds by the action of structurally variable enzymatic systems. Sci. Rep. 6: 25279. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25279
피인용 문헌
- Functional Metagenomic Technologies for the Discovery of Novel Enzymes for Biomass Degradation and Biofuel Production vol.12, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-10005-w
- Antarctic tundra soil metagenome as useful natural resources of cold-active lignocelluolytic enzymes vol.57, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-019-9217-1
- Metagenomic Insight into Lignocellulose Degradation of the Thermophilic Microbial Consortium TMC7 vol.31, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2106.06015
- Bacteria associated with wood tissues of Esca‐diseased grapevines: functional diversity and synergy with Fomitiporia mediterranea to degrade wood components vol.23, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15676
- Improved method for the extraction of high-quality DNA from lignocellulosic compost samples for metagenomic studies vol.105, pp.23, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11647-7