DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Budbreak, Floral Bud and Fruit Characteristics of Kiwifruit as Affected by Various Windbreaks

파풍망 종류에 따른 키위의 발아, 개화 및 과실 특성

  • Kwack, Yong-Bum (Namhae Branch, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Hong Lim (Namhae Branch, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Mockhee (Namhae Branch, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Rhee, Han-Cheol (Namhae Branch, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kwak, Youn-Sig (Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Yong Bok (Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 곽용범 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 남해출장소) ;
  • 김홍림 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 남해출장소) ;
  • 이목희 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 남해출장소) ;
  • 이한철 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 남해출장소) ;
  • 곽연식 (경상대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 이용복 (경상대학교 농업생명과학연구원)
  • Received : 2017.09.23
  • Accepted : 2017.09.15
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Kiwifruit growers build their vineyards using many windbreaks to protect their kiwifruit vines from defoliation injury by strong winds such as typhoon. In this study, we have compared fruit quality, budbreak rate and floral bud as affected by windbreaks. And also we surveyed several microclimate indices of kiwifruit orchard depending on the covering materials of arch-type windbreaks. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five different windbreak materials including polyethylene film (PE), blue- and white-colored nets were tested in pipe-framed archtype kiwifruit vineyards as the covering materials. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), annual mean temperature (AMT) and chill unit (CU) as well as fruit quality were compared among the covering materials. In all treatments, annual PAR was more than $400{\mu}mol\;m^{-2}s^{-1}$, in which kiwifruit leaf could reach its maximum photosynthesis, since the leaves were emerged. Annual mean temperature was greater in 0.1 mm-PE covering as much as $1-2^{\circ}C$ than other windbreaks. In CU calculated by three different models, all windbreaks showed more than 1400 CU that is fully fulfilled CU for kiwifruit rest completion. There were no difference in budbreak rate among the covering materials. Fruit weight was heavier in 0.1 mm-PE and white-net (4 mm) than other windbreaks. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the windbreak materials, the PAR quantity was enough for kiwifruit photosynthesis. And CU for kiwifruit rest completion was fully achieved in all treatments. However, with respect to fruit weight, quantity of PAR, and AMT, etc., It is highly recommended for kiwifruit growers to choose 0.1 mm-PE and white-net (4 mm) as for their windbreaks materials.

태풍에 의한 조기낙엽과 같은 바람피해 예방을 위해 키위재배에서 이용되고 있는 파풍망의 종류에 따른 과수원 내 미세기상의 차이 및 과실품질과 이듬해 발아, 개화에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 국내 키위재배에서 바람피해 예방을 위해 사용되고 있는 5종류의 파풍 소재를 4.3 m 높이의 철재 하우스 골조의 지붕에 피복하였다. 파풍망 종류에 따른 과원 내 광합성유효광선(PAR) 투과량, 연평균기온 등의 미세기상과 저온요구도 충족여부 및 과실특성을 조사, 비교하였다. 모든 처리에서 4~10월 생육기에 연평균 $400{\mu}mol\;m^{-2}s^{-1}$이상의 PAR투과율을 나타내 키위의 최대순동화율에 필요한 광량이 부족하지 않았다. 연평균 기온은 PE필름에서 파풍망에 비해 $1{\sim}2^{\circ}C$높았다. 3가지 모델에 의해 산출된 저온요구도(CU)는 파풍망 종류에 관계없이 1400 CU 이상으로 키위의 발아, 개화에 필요한 저온요구도를 충족하였다. 결과모지 눈의 발아율은 차이가 없었으며, 과중은 PE필름과 백색망 4 mm 피복처리에서 다른 파풍망보다 증가했다. 결론적으로 PAR 투과, 연평균 기온, 과중 등을 종합적으로 고려하면 PE필름과 백색 4 mm 파풍망이 키위 생산에 가장 효과적인 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Briassoulis, D., Mistriotis, A., & Eleftherakis, D. (2007). Mechanical behaviour and properties of agricultural nets-Part I: Testing methods for agricultural nets. Polymer Testing, 26(6), 822-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.05.007
  2. Brundell, D. J. (1976). The effect of chilling on the termination of rest and flower bud development of the chinese gooseberry. Scientia Horticulturae, 4(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(76)80010-6
  3. Buwalda, J. G., Meekings, J. S., & Smith G. S. (1991). Seasonal changes in photosynthetic capacity of leaves of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) vines. Physiologia Plantarum, 83(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb01286.x
  4. Caldwell, J. (1989). Kiwifruit performance in South Carolina and effect of winter chilling. Clemson University, Clemson South Carolina, 10, 127-129.
  5. Choi, S. T., Kang, S. M., Park, D. S., Song, W, D., & Seo, G. K. (2002). Thinning effect on fruit characteristics and reserve accumulation of persimmon trees defoliated in early autumn. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 43(6), 660-665.
  6. Gravina, A., Cataldo, J., Gambetta, G., Pardo, E., & Fornero, C. (2011). Relation of peel damage in citrus fruit to wind climate in orchard and its control. Scientia Horticulturae, 129(1), 45-51.
  7. Jarvis, P. P. G. (1985). Coupling of transpiration to the atmosphere in horticultural crops: the omega factor. In I International Symposium on Water Relations in Fruit Crops, 171, 187-206.
  8. Judd, M. J., & McAneney, K. J. (1984). Water use by tamarillos (Cyphomandra betacea) within a sheltered orchard environment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 32(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(84)90026-1
  9. Kwack, Y. B., Kim, H. L., Choi, Y. H., Lee, J. H., Kim, J. G., & Lee, Y. B. (2012). Fruit quality and fruit locule air hole of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv. Hayward) affected by early defoliation, Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 31(3), 229-234. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2012.31.3.229
  10. Kwack, Y. B., Kim, H. L., Chae, W. B., Lee, J. H., Lee, E. H., Kim, J. G., & Lee, Y. B. (2013). Regrowth of buds and flower bud formation in kiwifruit as affected by early defoliation, Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 32(3), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2013.32.3.201
  11. Kwack, Y. B., Kim, H. L., Chae, W. B., Kim, S. H., Lee, Y. B., & Kim, J. G. (2014). Carbohydrate reserves of non-fruiting young kiwifruit vines as affected by early artificial defoliation, Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 55(6), 462-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-014-0042-5
  12. Kwack, Y. B., Kang, S. M., Kim, H. L., Kim, M. J., Kim, S. C., & Lee, Y. B. (2015). Regrowth of axillary buds the current season and early growth and development the following year in fruiting young kiwifruit as affected by early defoliation, Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 34(4), 288-293. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2015.34.4.44
  13. Lionakis, S., & Schwabe, W. W. (1984). Bud dormancy in the kiwifruit, Actinidia chinensis Planch. Annals of Botany, 54(4), 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086818
  14. Norton, R. L. (1988).Windbreaks: benefits to orchard and vineyard crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 22-23, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90019-9
  15. Oukabli, A., Bartolini, S., & VITI, R. (2003). Anatomical and morphological study of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) flower buds growing under inadequate winter chilling. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 78(4), 580-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2003.11511667
  16. Piller, G. J., & Meekings, J. S. (1997). The acquisition and utilization of carbon in early spring by kiwifruit shoots. Annals of Botany, 79(5), 573-581. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0382
  17. Sunley, R. J., Atkinson, C. J., & Jones, H. G. (2006). Chill unit models and recent changes in the occurrence of winter chill and spring frost in the united kingdom. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 81(6), 949-958. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2006.11512181
  18. Tanhora, K. (1988). Encyclopedia of kiwifruit, pp. 150-152, Yaki Inc., Japan.
  19. Weinberger, J. H. (1950). Chilling requirement of peach varieties. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 56, 122-128.
  20. Weinberger, J. H. (1954). Effects of high temperatures during the breaking of the rest of 'Sullivan Elberta' peach buds. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 63, 157-162.
  21. Williams, R. R. (1970). Factors affecting pollination in fruit trees. Physiology of Tree Crops. Luckwill, L. C., Cutting, C. V. (eds.). pp. 193-207, Academic Press, London.