DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Navigator Lookout Activity Classification Using Wearable Accelerometers

  • Youn, Ik-Hyun (Department of Computer Science, College of IS&T, University of Nebraska at Omaha) ;
  • Youn, Jong-Hoon (Department of Computer Science, College of IS&T, University of Nebraska at Omaha)
  • Received : 2017.08.30
  • Accepted : 2017.09.13
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

Maintaining a proper lookout activity routine is integral to preventing ship collision accidents caused by human errors. Various subjective measures such as interviewing, self-report diaries, and questionnaires have been widely used to monitor the lookout activity patterns of navigators. An objective measurement of a lookout activity pattern classification system is required to improve lookout performance evaluation in a real navigation setting. The purpose of this study was to develop an objective navigator lookout activity classification system using wearable accelerometers. In the training session, 90.4% accuracy was achieved in classifying five fundamental lookout activities. The developed model was then applied to predict real-lookout activity in the second session during an actual ship voyage. 86.9% agreement was attained between the directly observed activity and predicted activity. Based on these promising results, the proposed unobstructed wearable system is expected to objectively evaluate navigator lookout patterns to provide a better understanding of lookout performance.

Keywords

References

  1. J. J. Leonard and A. Bahr, "Autonomous underwater vehicle navigation," Springer Handbook of Ocean Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 341-358, 2016.
  2. L. Paull, S. Saeedi, M. Seto and H. Li, "AUV navigation and localization: a review," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 131-149, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2013.2278891
  3. J. M. Ross, Human Factors for Naval Marine Vehicle Design and Operation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2017.
  4. M. A. I. Branch, C. House, and C. Place, "Bridge watchkeeping safety study," Department for Transportation, Marine Accident Investigation Branch, Southampton, 2004.
  5. R. Phillips, "Sleep, watchkeeping and accidents: a content analysis of incident at sea reports," Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 229-240, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00007-9
  6. C. Chauvin, S. Lardjane, G. Morel, J. Clostermann, and B. Langard, "Human and organizational factors in maritime accidents: analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 59, pp. 26-37, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.006
  7. K. Murai, Y. Hayashi, L.C. Stone, and S. Inokuchi, "Basic evaluation of performance of bridge resource teams involved in on-board smart education: lookout pattern," Review of the Faculty of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, vol. 3, pp. 77-83, 2006.
  8. M. Harma, M. Partinen, R. Repo, M. Sorsa, and P. Siivonen, "Effects of 6/6 and 4/8 watch systems on sleepiness among bridge officers," Chronobiology International, vol. 25, no. 2-3, pp. 413-423, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520802106769
  9. Shimmer sensor specification [Internet], Available: http://www.shimmersensing.com.
  10. A. Williamson, D. A. Lombardi, S. Folkard, J. Stutts, T. K. Courtney, and J. L. Connor, "The link between fatigue and safety," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 498-515, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.011
  11. S. Zhang, A. V. Rowlands, P. Murray, and T. L. Hurst, "Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer," Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 44, no. 1, pp 742-748, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31823bf95c