DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between the sexual and the vegetative organs in a Polygonatum humile (Liliaceae) population in a temperate forest gap

  • Received : 2017.02.22
  • Accepted : 2017.08.02
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between the sexual reproduction and the resource allocation in a natural Polygonatum humile population grown in a temperate mixed forest gap. For this aim, the plant size, the node which flower was formed, the fruiting rate, and the dry weight of each organ were monitored from June 2014 to August 2015. Results: Firstly, in 3-13-leaf plants, plants with leaves ${\leq}8$ did not have flowers and in plants with over 9 leaves the flowering rate increased with the number of leaves. Among plants with the same number of leaves, the total leaf area and dry weight of flowering plants were larger than those of non-flowering plants. The minimum leaf area and dry weight of flowering plants were $100cm^2$ and 200 mg, respectively. Secondary, the flowers were formed at the 3rd~8th nodes, and the flowering rate was highest at the 5th node. Thirdly, cumulative values of leaf properties from the last leaf (the top leaf on a stem) to the same leaf rank were greater in a plant with a reproductive organ than in a plant without a reproductive organ. Fourthly, fruit set was 6.1% and faithful fruit was 2.6% of total flowers. Biomasses of new rhizomes produced per milligram dry weight of leaf were $0.397{\pm}190mg$ in plants that set fruit and $0.520{\pm}0.263mg$ in plants that did not, and the difference between the 2 plant groups was significant at the 0.1% level. Conclusions: P. humile showed that the 1st flower formed on the 3rd node from the shoot's base. And P. humile showed the minimum plant size needed in fruiting, and fruiting restricted the growth of new rhizomes. However, the fruiting rate was very low. Thus, it was thought that the low fruiting rate caused more energy to invest in the rhizomes, leading to a longer rhizome. A longer rhizome was thought to be more advantageous than a short one to avoid the shading.

Keywords

References

  1. Augusto, L., Dupouey, J.-L., & Ranger, J. (2003). Effects of tree species on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests. Annals of Forest Science, 60, 823-832. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003077
  2. Bierzydek, P. (1982). Life histories and demography of shade-tolerant temperate forest herbs: a review. The New Phytologist, 90, 757-776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03285.x
  3. Choung, Y.-S. (1991). Growth characteristics and demography of Polygonatum involucratum and Polygonatum humile ramet population. J Ecol Environ, 14, 305-316.
  4. Cook, R. E. (1983). Clonal plant population. American Scientist, 71, 244-253.
  5. De Kroon, H., & Schieving, F. (1991). Resource allocation patterns as a function of clonal morphology: a general model applies to a foraging clonal plant. Journal of Ecology, 79, 519-530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260730
  6. Ehrlen, J., & van Groenendael, J. (2001). Storage and the delayed costs of reproduction in the understorey perennial Lathyrus vernus. Journal of Ecology, 89, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00546.x
  7. Emborg, J. (1998). Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural temperature deciduous forest in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management, 106, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00299-5
  8. Hartnett, D. C. (1990). Size-dependent allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction in four clonal composites. Oecologia, 84, 254-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318281
  9. Hasegawa, T., & Kudo, G. (2005). Comparisons of growth schedule, reproductive property and allocation pattern among three rhizomatous Polygonatum species with reference to their habitat types. Plant Species Biology, 20, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2005.00120.x
  10. Hirose, T., & Kachi, N. (1982). Critical plant size for flowering in biennials with special reference to their distribution in a sand dune system. Oecologia, 55, 281-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376912
  11. Houle, G. (2002). The advantage of early flowering in the spring ephemeral annual plant Floerkea proserpinacoides. The New Phytologist, 154(3), 689-694. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00418.x
  12. Jang, C.-C. (2002). A taxonomic review of Korean Polygonatum (Ruscaceae). Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy, 32, 417-447. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2002.32.4.417
  13. Jang, K. H., Park, J. M., Kang, J. H, & Lee, S. T. (1998). Growth and flowering characteristics of Polygonatum spp. Journal of Medicinal Crop Science, 6, 142-148.
  14. Jerling, L. (1988). Clone dynamics, population dynamics and vegetation pattern of Glaux maritima on a Baltic sea shore meadow. Vegetatio, 74, 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044742
  15. Lee, T. B. (2003). Coloured flora of Korea (p. 676). Seoul: Hyangmoon Publishing Co..
  16. Lee, W. T. (1996). Coloured standard illustrations of Korean plants (p. 399). Seoul: Academybook Co..
  17. Legner, N., Fleck, S., & Leuschner, C. (2013). Low light acclimation in five temperate broad-leaved tree species of different successional status: the significance of a shade canopy. Annals of Forest Science, 70, 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0298-4
  18. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., de Jong, T. M., & Meelis, E. (1990). How to test for proportionality in the reproductive effort of plants. Amer Natl, 135, 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1086/285045
  19. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., Meelis, E., de Jong, T. J., & Weiner, J. (1992). On the analysis of size-dependent reproductive output in plant. Functional Ecology, 6, 308-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389522
  20. Reekie, E. G., & Bazzaz, F. A. (1987). Reproductive effort in plants. 2. Does carbon reflect allocation of other resources? Am Natl, 129, 897-906. https://doi.org/10.1086/284682
  21. Samson, D. A., & Werk, K. S. (1986). Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. The American Naturalist, 127, 667-680. https://doi.org/10.1086/284512
  22. Schemske, D. W., Willson, M. F., Melampty, M. N., Miller, L. J., Verner, L., Schemske, K. M., & Best, L. B. (1978). Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecol, 59, 351-366. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936379
  23. Schmid, B., & Weiner, J. (1993). Plastic relationships between reproductive and vegetative mass in Solidago altissima. Evolution, 47, 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01199.x
  24. Seo, Y.-S., Park, W.-H., & Cha, Y.-Y. (2011). Effects of Polygonatum odoratum on lowering lipid and antioxidation. J Oriental Rehab Med, 21, 49-62.
  25. Silvertown, J. W. (1982). Introduction to population ecology (p. 209). New York: Longman Group Ltd.
  26. Stephenson, A. G. (1981). Flowers and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 12, 253-279. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001345
  27. Stears, S. C. (1989). Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Functional Ecology, 3, 259-268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389364
  28. Verburg, R. W., Kwant, R., & Werger, M. J. A. (1996). The effect of plant size on vegetative reproduction in a pseudo-annual. Vegetatio, 125, 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044650
  29. Worley, A. C., & Harder, L. D. (1996). Size-dependent resource allocation and costs of reproduction in Pinguicula vulgaris (Lentibulariaceae). Journal of Ecology, 84, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261355

Cited by

  1. Characteristics of reproductive effect and phenology of Polygonatum stenophyllum grown in riverside in Paju-si vol.22, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17663/jwr.2020.22.2.73