DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor differ according to the type of EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer?

  • Choi, Yong Won (Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Hyuk (Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.07.13
  • Accepted : 2017.03.02
  • Published : 2017.05.01

Abstract

An exon 19 deletion and a L858R mutation in exon 21 of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the two most common mutations that predict favorable efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many retrospective and prospective studies, as well as meta-analyses including patients with NSCLC with various lines of EGFR TKI treatment, have demonstrated longer progression-free survival and sometimes more favorable overall survival in patients with an exon 19 deletion than those with the L858R or other mutations. In contrast, some clinical studies, including phase III trials, have demonstrated no difference in the efficacy of EGFR TKIs according to the EGFR mutation type. Therefore, the existence of clinically significant differences in sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs among different EGFR mutation subtypes remains controversial. In this review, we summarize the evidence suggesting different outcomes according to the type of EGFR mutation in patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with EGFR-TKIs, along with their clinical significance. We also discuss possible mechanisms that can explain the different sensitivities to EGFR TKIs between cases with an exon 19 deletion and those with the L858R mutation.

Keywords

References

  1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Lee DH, Lee JS. Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2014. Cancer Res Treat 2014;46:124-130. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.124
  2. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9-29. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21208
  3. Jett JR, Schild SE, Kesler KA, Kalemkerian GP. Treatment of small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143(5 Suppl):e400S-e419S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2363
  4. Spira A, Ettinger DS. Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:379-392. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra035536
  5. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-smallcell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;346:92-98. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011954
  6. Choi YW, Ahn MS, Jeong GS, et al. Is fourth-line chemotherapy routine practice in advanced non-small cell lung cancer? Lung Cancer 2015;87:155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.11.016
  7. Reck M, Popat S, Reinmuth N, et al. Metastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014;25 Suppl 3:iii27-iii39. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu199
  8. Jang TW, Oak CH, Chang HK, Suo SJ, Jung MH. EGFR and KRAS mutations in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. Korean J Intern Med 2009;24:48-54. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2009.24.1.48
  9. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2129-2139. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040938
  10. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497-1500. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099314
  11. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2380-2388. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0909530
  12. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, et al. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70364-X
  13. Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:141-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71173-8
  14. Lee SH, Kim WS, Choi YD, et al. Analysis of mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor gene in Korean patients with non-small cell lung cancer: summary of a nationwide survey. J Pathol Transl Med 2015;49:481-488. https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2015.09.14
  15. Carey KD, Garton AJ, Romero MS, et al. Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib. Cancer Res 2006;66:8163-8171. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0453
  16. Jackman DM, Yeap BY, Sequist LV, et al. Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3908-3914. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0462
  17. Riely GJ, Pao W, Pham D, et al. Clinical course of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12(3 Pt 1):839-844. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1846
  18. Sun JM, Won YW, Kim ST, et al. The different efficacy of gefitinib or erlotinib according to epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations in Korean non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2011;137:687-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-010-0928-2
  19. Won YW, Han JY, Lee GK, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations. J Clin Pathol 2011;64:947-952. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200169
  20. Lee VH, Tin VP, Choy TS, et al. Association of exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutation patterns with treatment outcome after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor in metastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:1148-1155. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31829f684a
  21. Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C, et al. Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;361:958-967. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0904554
  22. Kim DW, Lee SH, Lee JS, et al. A multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as first-line treatment for Korean patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. Lung Cancer 2011;71:65-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.04.005
  23. Igawa S, Kasajima M, Ishihara M, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer according to the type of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Oncology 2014;87:215-223. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362603
  24. Asahina H, Yamazaki K, Kinoshita I, et al. A phase II trial of gefitinib as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Br J Cancer 2006;95:998-1004. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603393
  25. Sequist LV, Martins RG, Spigel D, et al. First-line gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2442-2449. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8494
  26. Sugio K, Uramoto H, Onitsuka T, et al. Prospective phase II study of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. Lung Cancer 2009;64:314-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.09.010
  27. Inoue A, Suzuki T, Fukuhara T, et al. Prospective phase II study of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3340-3346. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4692
  28. Wang H, Huang J, Yu X, et al. Different efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and prognosis in patients with subtypes of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2014;140:1901-1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-014-1709-0
  29. Zhang Y, Sheng J, Kang S, et al. Patients with exon 19 deletion were associated with longer progression-free survival compared to those with L858R mutation after firstline EGFR-TKIs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e107161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107161
  30. Lee CK, Wu YL, Ding PN, et al. Impact of specific epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and clinical characteristics on outcomes after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:1958-1965. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1736
  31. Sheng M, Wang F, Zhao Y, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations after tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2016;72:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1966-0
  32. Choi YW, Jeon SY, Jeong GS, et al. EGFR exon 19 deletion is associated with favorable overall survival after first-line gefitinib therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Am J Clin Oncol 2016 Mar 10 [Epub]. http://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000282.
  33. Mulloy R, Ferrand A, Kim Y, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib. Cancer Res 2007;67:2325-2330. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4293
  34. Zhu JQ, Zhong WZ, Zhang GC, et al. Better survival with EGFR exon 19 than exon 21 mutations in gefitinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients is due to differential inhibition of downstream signals. Cancer Lett 2008;265:307-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.064
  35. Okabe T, Okamoto I, Tamura K, et al. Differential constitutive activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cells bearing EGFR gene mutation and amplification. Cancer Res 2007;67:2046-2053. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3339
  36. Okabayashi Y, Kido Y, Okutani T, Sugimoto Y, Sakaguchi K, Kasuga M. Tyrosines 1148 and 1173 of activated human epidermal growth factor receptors are binding sites of Shc in intact cells. J Biol Chem 1994;269:18674-18678.
  37. Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Gale CM, et al. PF00299804, an irreversible pan-ERBB inhibitor, is effective in lung cancer models with EGFR and ERBB2 mutations that are resistant to gefitinib. Cancer Res 2007;67:11924-11932. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1885
  38. Furuyama K, Harada T, Iwama E, et al. Sensitivity and kinase activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 and others to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Sci 2013;104:584-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12125
  39. Chen LY, Molina-Vila MA, Ruan SY, et al. Coexistence of EGFR T790M mutation and common activating mutations in pretreatment non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2016;94:46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.01.019

Cited by

  1. The expression of circulating miR-504 in plasma is associated with EGFR mutation status in non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients vol.76, pp.18, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03089-2