DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association of biofilm production with colonization among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii

  • Ryu, Seong Yeol (Department of Infectious Diseases, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center) ;
  • Baek, Won-Ki (Department of Microbiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Ah (Department of Infectious Diseases, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.20
  • 심사 : 2016.04.05
  • 발행 : 2017.03.01

초록

Background/Aims: The pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii is increasingly causing healthcare-associated infections worldwide, particularly in intensive care units. Biofilm formation, a factor contributing to the virulence of A. baumannii, is associated with long-term persistence in hospital environments. The present study investigates the clinical impact of biofilm production on colonization and acquisition after patient admission. Methods: Forty-nine A. baumannii isolates were obtained between August and November 2013 from Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea. All isolates were obtained from sputum samples of new patients infected or colonized by A. baumannii. The microtiter plate assay was used to determine biofilm formation. Results: Twenty-four A. baumannii isolates (48%) demonstrated enhanced biofilm formation capacity than that of the standard A. baumannii strain (ATCC 19606). All isolates were resistant to carbapenem, 38 isolates (77%) were collected from patients in an intensive care unit, and 47 isolates (95%) were from patients who had been exposed to antibiotics in the previous month. The median duration of colonization was longer for biofilm-producing isolates than that of the biofilm non-biofilm producing isolates (18 days vs. 12 days, p < 0.05). Simultaneous colonization with other bacteria was more common for biofilm-producing isolates than that for the non-biofilm producing isolates. The most prevalent co-colonizing bacteria was Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusions: Biofilm-producing isolates seem to colonize the respiratory tract for longer durations than the non-biofilm producing isolates. During colonization, biofilm producers promote co-colonization by other bacteria, particularly S. aureus. Additional research is required to determine possible links between biofilm formation and nosocomial infection.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 2008;21:538-582. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00058-07
  2. Chung DR, Song JH, Kim SH, et al. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant nonfermenters in hospital-acquired pneumonia in Asia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:1409-1417. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201102-0349OC
  3. Talbot GH, Bradley J, Edwards JE Jr, et al. Bad bugs need drugs: an update on the development pipeline from the Antimicrobial Availability Task Force of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:657-668. https://doi.org/10.1086/499819
  4. Lee HW, Koh YM, Kim J, et al. Capacity of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii to form biofilm and adhere to epithelial cell surfaces. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008;14:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01842.x
  5. Espinal P, Marti S, Vila J. Effect of biofilm formation on the survival of Acinetobacter baumannii on dry surfaces. J Hosp Infect 2012;80:56-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2011.08.013
  6. Da Silva G, Dijkshoorn L, van der Reijden T, van Strijen B, Duarte A. Identification of widespread, closely related Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Portugal as a subgroup of European clone II. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007;13:190-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01628.x
  7. Kaliterna V, Goic-Barisic I. The ability of biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii belonging to two different European clones causing outbreaks in the Split University Hospital, Croatia. J Chemother 2013;25:60-62. https://doi.org/10.1179/1973947812Y.0000000052
  8. Arvaniti K, Lathyris D, Ruimy R, et al. The importance of colonization pressure in multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii acquisition in a Greek intensive care unit. Crit Care 2012;16:R102. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11383
  9. Sheng WH, Liao CH, Lauderdale TL, et al. A multicenter study of risk factors and outcome of hospitalized patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14:e764-e769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.2254
  10. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002
  11. Pettit RK, Weber CA, Kean MJ, et al. Microplate Alamar blue assay for Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:2612-2617. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.7.2612-2617.2005
  12. Tomaras AP, Dorsey CW, Edelmann RE, Actis LA. Attachment to and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces by Acinetobacter baumannii: involvement of a novel chaperone-usher pili assembly system. Microbiology 2003;149(Pt 12):3473-3484. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26541-0
  13. Kim HA, Ryu SY, Seo I, Suh SI, Suh MH, Baek WK. Biofilm formation and colistin susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from Korean nosocomial samples. Microb Drug Resist 2015;21:452-457. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2014.0236
  14. Lim CJ, Cheng AC, Kennon J, et al. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and risk factors for carriage in long-term care facilities: a nested case-control study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:1972-1980. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku077
  15. Pneumatikos IA, Dragoumanis CK, Bouros DE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia or endotracheal tube-associated pneumonia? An approach to the pathogenesis and preventive strategies emphasizing the importance of endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology 2009;110:673-680. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819868e0
  16. Gil-Perotin S, Ramirez P, Marti V, et al. Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm in ventilator-associated pneumonia response: a state of concept. Crit Care 2012;16:R93. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11357
  17. Zago CE, Silva S, Sanita PV, et al. Dynamics of biofilm formation and the interaction between Candida albicans and methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). PLoS One 2015;10:e0123206. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123206
  18. Gaddy JA, Tomaras AP, Actis LA. The Acinetobacter baumannii 19606 OmpA protein plays a role in biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces and in the interaction of this pathogen with eukaryotic cells. Infect Immun 2009;77:3150-3160. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00096-09

피인용 문헌

  1. In vitro effect of subminimal inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on the biofilm formation ability of Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates vol.30, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/1120009x.2017.1378835
  2. Biofilm Formation and Detection of Fluoroquinolone- and Carbapenem-Resistant Genes in Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii vol.2019, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3454907
  3. A Study on Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus Strains Recovered from the Same Infection Site of a Diabetic Patient vol.76, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01696-7
  4. Role of PstS in the Pathogenesis of Acinetobacter baumannii Under Microaerobiosis and Normoxia vol.222, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa201
  5. Analysis of the Phospholipid Profile of the Collection Strain PAO1 and Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Relation to Their Attachment Capacity vol.22, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084003
  6. Gram-Negative Bacteria Holding Together in a Biofilm: The Acinetobacter baumannii Way vol.9, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071353
  7. Relationship between the Biofilm-Forming Capacity and Antimicrobial Resistance in Clinical Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates: Results from a Laboratory-Based In Vitro Study vol.9, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112384