DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structure-Activity Relationships of Peptide Antibiotics with Improved Bacterial Cell Selectivity of Pseudin

  • Lee, Yeongjoon (Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Jeon, Dasom (Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Kyoung (Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Yangmee (Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2017.06.21
  • Accepted : 2017.07.12
  • Published : 2017.09.20

Abstract

Pseudin is a naturally occurring 24 amino-acid-residue antimicrobial peptide derived from the skin of paradoxical frog Pseud's paradoxa. It shows potency against the bacteria and antibiotic-resistant bacteria strain, but has high cytotoxicity against mammalian cell. In our previous study, substitution of $Pro^{11}$ for Gly (Ps-P) increased bacterial cell selectivity but decreased the antibacterial activity of pseudin. In this study, we designed pseudin analogue, Ps-4K-P with increased cationicity up to +7 in Ps-P by substituting Glu14, Gln10, Gln24, and Leu18 with Lys. Ps-4K-P showed improved potent antibacterial activity with high bacterial cell selectivity. We determined the tertiary structure of Ps-4K-P in the presence of DPC micelles by NMR spectroscopy and it has a hinge structure at $Pro^{11}$ followed by three turn helices from $Pro^{11}$ to $Val^{23}$ at the C-terminus. Amphipathicity with increased cationicity as well as helix-hinge-helix structural motif provided by introduction of a Pro at position $Gly^{11}$ are the crucial factors which confer antibacterial activity with bacterial cell selectivity to Ps-4K-P.

Keywords

References

  1. R. E. W. Hancock, and D. J. Philpott, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 243 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2745
  2. R. M. Epand, and H. J. Vogel, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1462, 11 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00198-4
  3. R. E. Hancock, and A. Rozek, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 206, 143 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11000.x
  4. M. Zasloff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 84, 5449 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.15.5449
  5. J. M. Conlon, Rev. Med. Microbiol. 15, 17 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1097/01.revmedmi.0000131428.20976.c6
  6. H. Abdel-Wahab, G. J. Power, M. T. Ng, P. R. Flatt, and J. M. Conlon., Biol. Chem. 389, 143 (2008)
  7. D. Jeon, M.C. Jeong, B. Jacob, J. K. Bang, E. H. Kim, C. Cheong, I. Jung, Y. Park, and Y. Kim, Sci. Rep. 7, 1455 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01474-0
  8. E. Lee, J.K. Kim, D. Jeon, K.W. Jeong, A. Shin, and Y. Kim, Sci. Rep. 5, 12048 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12048
  9. Bax, and D. G. Davis, J. Magn. Reson. 65, 355 (1985)
  10. Bax, and D. G. Davis, J. Magn. Reson. 63, 207 (1985)
  11. T. D. Goddard, and D. G. Kneller, SPARKY3, University of California, SanFransico
  12. P. Guntert, Protein NMR Techniques, RIKEN Genomic Sciences Center, Yokohama, Japan
  13. D. Jeon, M, Jeong, J. Kim, K. Jeong, Y. Ko, and Y. Kim, J. Kor. Magn. Reson. 19, 54 (2015)
  14. G. Kim, H. Lee, H. Oh, and H. Won, J. Kor. Magn. Reson. 20, 954 (2016)