DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Leachate Replacement Effect on Solid State Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure and Sawdust Bedding Mixtures

  • Jo, Hyeonsoo (Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Seunghun (Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Eunjong (Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Ahn, Heekwon (Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2017.08.03
  • Accepted : 2017.08.31
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of leachate replacement frequency on solid state anaerobic digestion (SSAD) of dairy manure using 22 L volume lab-scale digesters at mesophilic temperature ($37^{\circ}C$) in batch mode. Three different leachate replacement strategies (no replacement, once every three days, and once every nine days) were applied and three digesters per each treatment were operated for 45 days. Results showed that leachate replacement test unit every nine days resulted in 1.6 times more methane production ($53.8N{\cdot}mL\;g^{-1}{\cdot}VS$) from SSAD compared to test unit every three days ($34.0N{\cdot}mL\;g^{-1}{\cdot}VS$). No leachate replacement strategy applied group showed slightly higher methane production ($56.3N{\cdot}mL\;g^{-1}{\cdot}VS$) than every nine days replaced one. When added the methane production potential of replaced leachate itself to the methane produced from digester, leachate replacement every nine days resulted in quite similar methane production ($56.5N{\cdot}mL\;g^{-1}{\cdot}VS$) to no leachate replacement group. Even though methane production potential of replaced leachate itself added to the methane produced from digester, every three days replacement showed only $34N{\cdot}mL$ methane production per gram of volatile solids. These results suggest that farmers do not need to replace leachate during SSAD of dairy manure and sawdust mixture in order to maximize methane production. If there are any concerns with accumulation of inhibiting substances in the digester, the 9-day cycle leachate replacement is appropriate.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, H.K., M.C. Smith, S.L. Kondrad, and J.W. White. 2010. Evaluation of biogas production potential by dry anaerobic digestion of switchgrass-animal manure mixtures. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 160:965-975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8624-x
  2. Anderson, G.K., T. Donnelly, and K.J. Mckeown.1982. Identification and control of inhibition in the anaerobic treatment of industrial wastewater. Process Biochem. 17: 28-32.
  3. Bae, J.H., M.S. You, D.S. Rue, J.G. Lee, and C.G. Kim. 2010. Waste recycling. Donghwa Technol. 31-141.
  4. Callaghan, F.J., D.A.J. Wase, K. Thayanithy, and C.F. Forster. 2002. Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenergy 22:71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00057-5
  5. Chen, Y., J.J. Cheng, and K.S. Creamer. 2008. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 99(10):4044-4064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057
  6. Cioabla, A.E., I. Ionel, G.A. Dumitrel, and F. Popescu. 2012. Comparative study on factors affecting anaerobic digestion of agricultural vegetal residues. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-1
  7. Dogan, E. and G.N. Demirer. 2012. Biogas generation by two-phase anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 4:063131. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4769203
  8. Drosg, B. 2013. Process monitoring in biogas plants. IEA Bioenergy. Dry anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and digestate management strategies. A.I.T.
  9. European Biogas Association. 2014. Biogas production statistics for Europe in 2013. Http://biofuelstp.eu/biogas.html.
  10. Gerardi, M.H. 2003. The microbiology of anaerobic digesters, Wastewater microbiology series. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, N.J.
  11. Jeanger, P.J. 2005. Optimizing dry anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Asian Institute of Technology school of Environment, R.D.I.
  12. Kafle, G.K. and Chen, L. 2016. Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. Waste Manage. 48:492-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.021
  13. Li, Y., S.Y. Park, and J. Zhu. 2011. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15:821-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042
  14. Ministry of Agriculture Food Rural Affairs. 2014. Annual livestock manure production report. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong, Korea.
  15. Mudhoo, A. and S. Kumar. 2013. Effects of heavy metals as stress factors on anaerobic digestion processes and biogas production from biomass. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10(6):1383-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0167-y
  16. Owen, W.F., D.C. Stuckey, J.B. Healy, L.Y. Young, and P.L. McCarty. 1979. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 13:485-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5
  17. Pullammanappallil, P.C., D.P. Chynoweth, G. Lyberatos, and S.A. Svoronos. 2001. Stable performance of anaerobic digestion in the presence of a high concentration of propionic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 78:165-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00187-5
  18. Sandra E., M. Miltner, K. Puchas. 2013. Monitoring review and guide for the optimization of anaerobic digestion and biomethane plants full report. Intelligent Energy EUROPE. R.41
  19. Schafer, W., M. Lehto, and F. Teye. 2006. Dry anaerobic digestion of organic residues on-farm-a feasibility study. Agrifood research reports 77. MTT Agrifood Research Finland.
  20. Shahriari, H., M. Warith, M. Hamoda, and K.J. Kennedy. 2012. Effect of leachate recirculation on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste. Waste Manage. 32:400-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.022
  21. Singh, B., K. Bauddh, and F. Bux. 2015. Algae and environmental sustainability, developments in applied phycology. Springer India.
  22. Sponza, D.T. and O.N. Agdag. 2004. Impact of leachate recirculation and recirculation volume on stabilization of municipal solid wastes in simulated anaerobic bioreactors. Process Biochem. 39:2157-2165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2003.11.012
  23. Standards Australia International. 2003. Composts, soil conditioners and mulches. Standards Australia International, Sydney, N.S.W.
  24. Strik, D.P.B.T.B., A.M. Domnanovich, and P. Holubar. 2006. A pH-based control of ammonia in biogas during anaerobic digestion of artificial pig manure and maize silage. Process Biochem. 41:1235-1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.008
  25. Sung, S. and T. Liu. 2003. Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Chemosphere 53:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00434-X
  26. Tritt, W.P. and H. Kang. 1991. Ultimate biodegradability and decay rates of cow paunch manure under anaerobic condition. Bioresour. Technol. 36:161-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(91)90174-I
  27. Wang, Y., Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and L. Meng. 2009. Effects of volatile fatty acid concentrations on methane yield and methanogenic bacteria. Biomass Bioenergy 33:848-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.01.007
  28. Wellinger, A., J.D. Murphy, and D. Baxter. 2013. The biogas handbook: science, production and applications, woodhead publishing series in energy. Elsevier Science.
  29. Youngsukkasem, S., S.K. Rakshit, and M.J. Taherzadeh. 2011. Biogas production by encapsulated methane-producing bacteria. Bioresources 7:056-0065.