DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공기구동 이젝터를 이용한 ABB (Air Bubble Barrier)의 기포거동 특성 연구 (II): 기포거동 특성의 비교 분석

A Study on Bubble Behavior Generated by an Air-driven Ejector for ABB (Air Bubble Barrier) (II): Comparison of Bubble Behavior with and without Ejector

  • Seo, Hyunduk (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Aliyu, Aliyu Musa (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyogeum (Infra & Offshore Research Team, GS Engineering & Construction) ;
  • Kim, Kyung Chun (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.12
  • 심사 : 2017.08.29
  • 발행 : 2017.08.31

초록

To verify floatability of ABB (Air bubble barrier), we compared bubble swarm behavior with and without the air-driven ejector. Experiment was conducted using the fabricated air-driven ejector with 5 mm nozzle on the bottom of 1 m3 water tank. Reynolds number of air in the nozzle was ranged 1766-13248. We analyzed data with statistical method using image processing, particle mage velocimetry (PIV) and proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis. As a result of POD analysis, there was no significant eigenmode in bubbly flow generated from the ejector. It means that more complex turbulent flows were formed by the ejector, thereby (1) making bubbles finer, (2) promoting three-dimensional energy transfer between bubble and water, and (3) making evenly distributed velocity profile of water. It is concluded that the air-driven ejector could enhance the performance of ABB.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Theofanous, T.G. and Sullivan, J., 1982, "Turbulence in two-phase dispersed flows," Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol,116(1), pp.343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112082000494
  2. Kantarci, N., Borak, F. and Ulgen, K.O., 2005. Bubble column reactors. Process Biochemistry, Vol.40(7), pp.2263-2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.10.004
  3. Garcia-Ochoa, F. and Gomez, E., 2009, "Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: An overview," Biotechnology Advances, Vol.27, pp.153-176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.10.006
  4. Ji, M.K., Kim, P.H., Park, K.T., Utomo, T., Chung, H.S. and Jeong, H.M., 2008, "Performance Characteristics of Air Driven Ejector According to the Position Changes and the Shape of Driving Nozzle," Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, Vol.32(4), pp.550-556. https://doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2008.32.4.550
  5. Cramers, P.H.M.R. and Beenackers, A.A.C.M., 2001, "Influence of the ejector configuration, scale and the gas density on the mass transfer characteristics of gas-liquid ejectors," Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol.82, pp.131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(00)00363-6
  6. Yin, J., Li, J., Li, H., Liu, W. and Wang, D., 2015, "Experimental study on the bubble generation characteristics for an venturi type bubble generator," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol.91, pp.218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.05.076
  7. Gordiychuk, A. Svanera, M., Benini, S. and Poesio, P., 2016, "Size distribution and Sauter mean diameter of micro bubbles for a Venturi type bubble generator," Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol.70, pp.51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.08.014
  8. Zheng, S., Yao, Y., Guo, F., Bi, R. and Li, J., 2010, "Local bubble size distribution, gas-liquid interfacial areas and gas holdups in an up-flow ejector," Chemical Engineering Science, Vol.65(18), pp.5264-5271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.06.027
  9. Sirovich, L., 1986, "Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Part I Coherent structures," Quarterly of applied mathematics, Vol.41, pp,561-571.
  10. Mula, S. M. and Tinney, C. E., 2014, "Classical and snapshot forms of the POD technique applied to a helical vortex filament," 44th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 16-20 June.