DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

4차 산업혁명에 따른 미래사회와 교육환경의 변화, 그리고 초·중등 과학교육의 과제

The Changes of Future Society and Educational Environment according to the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Tasks of School Science Education

  • 투고 : 2017.08.09
  • 심사 : 2017.08.26
  • 발행 : 2017.08.31

초록

Nowadays, the public as well as science educators pays much attention to the fourth industrial revolution and wonders what will happen to the societies in the future. Thus, this study aimed at predicting the education environment which will be brought from the fourth industrial revolution, and suggesting the solutions or tasks to be investigated in science education. Through the literature review, this study categorized the major changes of future society into a wild fluctuation of job market, the shift from possession-based economy to sharing economy, post-urbanized and distributed system, and the crisis of dehumanization. According to the four major changes, this study predicted the future environment that will occur to the educational system. First, the students should the competences necessary for the future and the school curriculum will be changed in terms of width and depth. Second, sharing economy may bring about the open platform similar to MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) or TED. Third, the manifestation of artificial intelligence in education will enable the individual and paced learning, and thanks to the change, the concept of distributed cognition will be more focused in education research. Fourth, the collaborative learning and character education should be more stressed to resist the dehumanization. This study suggests relevant tasks and issues that should be tackled for the successful change in primary and secondary schools.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (ACARA). (2013). The Australian curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au
  2. Bauer, M. W., Allum, N. & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287
  3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Thousand Oaks.
  4. Bernstein, J.(2008). Crunch - why do I feel so squeezed? San Franciso, CA: Barrett-Koehler Publishers.
  5. Beweja, B., Donovan, P., Haefele, M., Siddiqi, L. & Smiles, S. (2016). Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and investment implications of the fourth industrial revolution. Zurich, Switzerland: Union Bank of Switzerland.
  6. Boston Consulting Group. (2015). Takeoff in robotics will power the next productivity surge in manufacturing. Retrieved Feb. 15, 2017 from http://www.bcg.com/enza/d/press/10feb2015-robotics-power-productivity-surge-manufacturing-838
  7. Cha, D. & Kim, S. (2016). Job killer: the fourth industrial revolution: the future of employment after the grand change due to the robot and artificial intelligence [잡킬러: 4차 산업혁명, 로봇과 인공지능이 바꾸는 일자리의 미래]. Seoul: Hans Media.
  8. Chae, H.-I. & Noh, S.-G. (2015). The research trends in core competency education in Finland: with special emphasis on the analysis of elementary science education. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 19(3), 645-667. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2015.19.3.645
  9. Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
  10. Chun, B.-H., Park, K. & Chun, M. (2008). An analysis of the attitude toward science, achievements motivation, and the peer relationship, and parents' attitudes to science gifted education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18(3), 443-464.
  11. Chun, S., Go, H., Lee, Y., Kwak, Y., Choi, S., Kang, H. & Park, M. (2017). Development for "science for all Koreans. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  12. Class Central. (2017). MOOC course report: August 2017. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/mooccourse-report-august-2017/
  13. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  14. Doh, Y., Kim, I., Kim, J., Park, C. & Kang, B. (2013). The concept and application of the artificial intelligence [인공지능: 개념 및 응용]. Paju: Cytech Media.
  15. Facer, K. (2009). Educational, social and technological futures: A report from the Beyond Current Horizons Programme.
  16. Finnish National Board of Education. (FNBE). (1999). Framework for evaluating educational outcomes in Finland. Helsinki: FNBE.
  17. Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
  18. Glenn, J. C., Gordon, T. J. and Florescu, F.(2014). The state of the future. Washington, D.C.: The Millennium Project.
  19. Han, D. (2016). University education and contents in the fourth industrial revolution. Humanities Contents, 42, 9-24. https://doi.org/10.18658/humancon.2016.09.42.9
  20. Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  21. Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1
  22. Im, J.-W., Kim, S.-H., Cho, Y.-J. & Park, K.-S. (2008). The development of the virtual reality system for augmenting scientific inquiry learning environments. The KIPS Transactions : Part B, 15(2), 95-102.
  23. Institute for Management Development (IMD). (2016). IMD world talent report 2016. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD.
  24. Jeong, Y.-S. (2006). An inquiry on the directions and tasks for future-oriented teacher preparation. The Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 331-348.
  25. Jho, H. (2017). The changes of higher education and the tasks of general education according to the fourth industrial revolution. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(2), 53-89.
  26. Jho, H., Hong, O. & Song, J. (2016). An analysis of STEM/STEAM teacher education in Korea with a case study of two schools from a community of practice perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1843-1862.
  27. Joo, Y.-G., Chung, Y.-L. & Pyo, J.-Y. (2011). The effectiveness of creative problem solving (CPS) learning on student science interest, science process skills, and science achievement. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(3), 657-667. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.3.657
  28. Jung, J.-G. (2017). The virtual reality and education in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of East Asian Social Thoughts, 20(1), 191-217.
  29. Kim, D., Han, K. & Chang, D. (2016). A milestone study for core competences of science and future human resources in 2045. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  30. Kim, H. (2006). Elementary science education through e-learning [e-learning을 활용한 초등 과학교육]. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 58-67.
  31. Kim, H., Kang, N., Kim, M., Maeng, S., Park, J., Baek, Y., Son, J., Shim, K., Oh, P., Lee, K., Lee, B., Jeong, E. & Han, I. (2017). A basic investigation for the development of science education standards for the future generation. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  32. Kim, J., Park, B., Noh, Y. & Im, S. (2016). 2016 Davos report: the fourth industrial revolution starting with the artificial intelligence [2016 다보스 리포트: 인공지능발 4차 산업혁명]. Seoul: Maegyeong Publication.
  33. Kim, K. & Hong, Y.-S. (2015). Relationships among the science learning motivation and academic stress and stress coping styles of the elementary students with low science achievement. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(4), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2015.34.4.447
  34. Kim, K.-S., Lee, S.-Y., Jun, W.-C., Kim, H.-S., Kwak, H.-S., Kim, J.-H. & Seo, J.-H. (2011). Measuring ICT Literacy of primary and junior high school students in South Korea. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 22(3), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.22.3.201112.195
  35. Konrath, S. H., O'Brien, E. H. & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time - a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395
  36. Korea Employment Information Service. (KEIS). (2017). The prediction of jobs in Korea, 2017. [2017 한국직업 전망]. Seoul: KEIS.
  37. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. (KOFAC). (2015). A comprehensive plan of science education for 2016-2020. Seoul: KOFAC.
  38. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near - when humans transcend biology. New York: Viking.
  39. Kwak, Y. (2015). An exploration of teacher professionalism required for changes in future schooling and curriculum reconstruction. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 19(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2015.19.1.93
  40. Latour, B. (2005). Resembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  41. MacBeath, J. (2012). Learning in and out of school. New York: Routledge.
  42. Ministry of Education. (2015). The 2015 revised Korean national science curriculum. No. 2015-74. Sejong: Ministry of Education in Korea.
  43. Monbiot, G. (2017, February 15). In an age of robots, schools are teaching children to be redundant. The guardian. Retrieved https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/15/robots-schools-teaching-children-redundant-testing-learn-future
  44. Na, J. & Jang, B. (2017). The perspectives of pre-service elementary teachers on science education of future. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.1.085
  45. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.
  46. Noh, H.-J. & Paik, S.-H. (2014). STEAM-experienced teachers' perception of STEAM in secondary education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(10), 375-402.
  47. Park, S., Chung, W. & Park, Y. (2016). Analysis on the utilization of history of science and STEAM and elementary school teachers' perceptions about design-based STEAM instruction applying the history of science in science class. Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 166-188. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2016.40.2.166
  48. Park, S.-K. (2006). The effects of the group reward and cooperative skill training on the science achievement and learning motivation of elementary students. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 27(2), 121-129.
  49. Park, Y-S. & Cho, M. (2017). Posthuman education for future society: using Delphi technique. Art Education Researh Review, 31(2), 179-216.
  50. Ryoo, J. S. (2016). Which should be the aim of future education between knowledge and character? The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.15754/jkpe.2016.38.3.003
  51. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
  52. Shin, D., Kim, J., Kim, R., Lee, J., Lee, H. & Lee, J. (2012). Development of interdisciplinary teacher education programs. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(1), 371-398. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2012.16.1.371
  53. Shin, H.-S. & Jung, Y.-J. (2017). The 4th industrial revolution and future of educational administration. Journal of Research in Education, 30(2), 103-147.
  54. Shin Y.-J. & Han, S.-K. (2011). A study of the elementary school teachers' perception in STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, mathematics) education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523.
  55. Song, J. (1999). Between the beginning of the 19th century and the middle of the 20th century: The process of the quickening and development of science-technologysociety education in the United Kingdom (I). Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 19(3), 409-427.
  56. STEPI Center for Strategic Foresight. (2016). Will the future get better? [미래는 더 나아질 것인가]. Seoul: RHKorea.
  57. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (UNESCO). (2005). Definition and selection of competencies - Executive summary. Retrieved Feb 27, 2017 from http://deseco.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.parsys.43469.downloadList.2296.DownloadFile.tmp/2005.dskcexecutivesummary.en.pdf
  58. UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. Retrieved Feb 3, 2017 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002331/233137E.pdf
  59. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  60. Westlake, S. (2014). Our work here is done - visions of a robot economy. London, U.K.: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA).
  61. World Economic Forum. (2016a). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. Retrieved May 10, 2017 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdf
  62. World Economic Forum. (2016b). The fourth industrial revolution: what it means, how to respond. Retrieved Mar 3, 2017 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond
  63. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

피인용 문헌

  1. Teachers’ Practical Concerns and Choices in Implementing and Designing of Mobile-Based Problem Solving: Focusing on the Case of Elementary Science and Mathematics Gifted Students vol.56, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.56.4.201712.519
  2. Social Consensus in the Era of the 4th Industrial Revolution and Tasks of Citizenship Education vol.49, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.35557/trce.49.4.201712.003
  3. The Effect of Reasons of College Major Selection and Stresses of College Life on Career Confidence according to Experience of Gifted vol.66, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2018.66.1.229